UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
☑ | Filed by the Registrant | ☐ | Filed by a |
CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX: | ||
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, | |
☑ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material |
SL Green Realty Corp.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Thanother than the Registrant)
PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK | |||
☑ | No fee | ||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary | ||
☐ | |||
20162022
ProxyPROXY STATEMENT
Statement
April 22, 2016APRIL 21, 2022
2016 PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTSLETTER TO STOCKHOLDERS
During2015,Dear Fellow Stockholders,
As New York City emerges stronger than ever, we are incredibly proud to be on the front lines of the city’s resilience. SL Green has been an integral force pushing the City’s advancement in numerous ways, from precipitating the long-awaited revival of East Midtown with the introduction of One Vanderbilt’s sustainable office space and extensive transit improvements, to continuing to address food insecurity through Food1st, in partnership with Chef Daniel Boulud and local New York City restaurants. Despite the lingering impacts of the pandemic, the entire SL Green team has been 100% in the office since June 2020, maintaining their focus on building long-term value, which benefits our CEOstockholders, our tenants, our employees, and otherour community.
Stockholder feedback is central to the Board’s decision process and has been fundamental in evolving the company’s governance. Following director engagement with many of SL Green’s top stockholders in the fall and winter of 2021, in March 2022 we welcomed Carol N. Brown as an Independent Director to SL Green’s Board of Directors, adding diversity of background, experience and skills. Ms. Brown brings with her decades of talent and experience in the areas of land use planning, real estate transactions and law. Additionally, the Compensation Committee responded to stockholder feedback by reaffirming our commitment to the pre-pandemic, performance-based executive officers led uscompensation structure, which stockholders have supported given its strong alignment with their interests.
Our focus on sustainability and green initiatives has been leading-edge since we formed the team dedicated to these efforts 15 years ago. Now, One Vanderbilt represents the next generation of development and has been recognized as the most sustainable commercial building in New York City, with Urban Land Institute New York’s “Award for Excellence in Development.” It is also on track to be the first large-scale development project in New York City to achieve strong operationalWELL Platinum certification for its focus on the wellbeing of the thousands of people who work in the building. We are also excited for SL Green’s next chapter of sustainable development at One Madison, which will incorporate and financial results, includingexpand on all the following:lessons learned from our prior developments.
We continue to meet stakeholder demand for enhanced transparency of our ESG program. This year, we disclosed our approach to climate risk management by publishing our first stand-alone TCFD report, addressing climate resilience. Our status as an industry leader in ESG is validated by our performance on GRESB, where we achieved a 5-Star Rating, marking us as one of the most sustainable real estate companies globally, and have received the ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year Sustained Excellence award, achieved by less than one percent of the 16,000 U.S. EPA partners.
The SL Green board has worked tirelessly alongside the entire SL Green executive team to emerge from the tumult of the last two years with a stronger, more resilient portfolio and we remain committed to employing business strategies in a responsible way that deliver the most value to our stockholders.
Sincerely,
John H. Alschuler | Betsy S. Atkins | Carol N. Brown | ||
Lead Independent Director | Independent Director | Independent Director | ||
| ||||
Edwin T. Burton, III | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
Stephen L. Green | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
Independent Director | Independent Director | Director |
| ||||
Marc Holliday | John S. Levy | |||
Independent Director | Chairman of the | Independent Director | ||
Andrew W. Mathias | ||||
President and Director |
2016 Proxy Statement 1
20161
BOARD RESPONSIVENESS IN 2021
Over the last few years, our Compensation Committee has embarked on a robust stockholder outreach program. That feedback has served as a key input to compensation design and structural upgrades implemented since 2018. The success of the engagement program is evidenced by the significant changes adopted as a direct result of the feedback received, and the significant increase in stockholder support in 2019 and 2020.
The Committee was disappointed by the 2021 advisory vote on executive compensation (“Say on Pay”) but remains committed to understanding stockholder sentiment. In response, the Committee reached out to investors several months earlier than in prior years to ensure that any actionable feedback received could be better incorporated into Compensation Committee discussions and decisions for 2022 and beyond.
In the fall and winter of 2021, we contacted stockholders collectively representing 65% of outstanding shares, and had substantive conversations with stockholders representing 50% of outstanding shares. Directors participated in several stockholder discussions, as well as in conversations with both proxy advisors. The majority of calls were led by the Chairs of the Compensation or Nominating and Corporate Governance committees.
Offered Engagement with approximately 65% of Outstanding Shares | Direct one-on-one discussions with approximately 50% of Outstanding Shares | Directors participated in calls with stockholders representing approximately 36% of Outstanding Shares |
The table below summarizes the feedback received during the post-2021 annual meeting outreach and actions taken in response:
Feedback Theme | Specific Topics | Stockholder Feedback (“What We Heard”) | Action (“What We Did”) |
Executive Compensation | Overall Compensation Philosophy | Stockholders support our pre-pandemic compensation structure that focused on performance-based pay elements | The Compensation Committee has reaffirmed its commitment to our pre-pandemic compensation structure |
2021 Vote Discussion | Stockholders who voted against Say on Pay in 2021 consistently indicated they did so primarily because they disagreed with the isolated decision to grant additional time-based equity | 2021 compensation is approximately 90% at-risk for all of our named executive officers, and performance-based incentives are in line with pre-pandemic percentages | |
Approach to Future Pandemic-Related Business Disruption | Stockholders who voted against Say on Pay in 2021 wanted to understand the Compensation Committee’s approach to incentive compensation, in light of the unpredictability of the COVID-19 virus | The Committee and Board agree that in a similarly highly disruptive event to the business, feedback from stockholder engagement and discussions with proxy advisors will inform the approach taken with respect to the treatment of incentive compensation | |
Design of compensation program | Stockholders confirmed strong support for actions taken since 2018 to simplify the pay elements and strengthen the alignment of pay and performance | Executives’ employment agreements renewed at the end of 2021 were substantially identical to the agreements redesigned in 2018, further confirming the Compensation Committee’s commitment to our pre-pandemic compensation structure | |
Corporate Governance | Board racial/ ethnic diversity | Stockholders requested the addition of qualified directors who would enhance the racial/ethnic diversity on the Board | Appointed Carol N. Brown, a law professor with expertise in real estate law, to the SLG Board effective March 4, 2022 |
Board succession planning | Stockholders requested disclosure of Board succession planning | Terminating retainer for Chairman Emeritus effective December 31, 2023, with interim reductions commencing January 1, 2022; Planned retirement of Director John Levy at 2023 annual meeting of stockholders | |
Director-by-director skills matrix | Stockholders encouraged the inclusion of a director-by-director skills matrix instead of aggregate board skills matrix | Enhanced disclosure of board skills by including a director-by-director skills matrix in the 2022 proxy statement | |
ESG | ESG Disclosure | Stockholders commended our “spot on” disclosure as being “industry-leading” | Published 2021 ESG report in accordance with GRI, CDP, GRESB, SASB, TCFD frameworks, and UN SDG guidelines and first standalone TCFD Report |
2 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS
ROADMAP OF VOTING MATTERS
● The Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated 10 directors for re-election to serve until the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify. | The Board recommends a vote | ► | |||
| |||||
Lauren B. Dillard | Marc Holliday | ||||
Betsy S. Atkins | Stephen L. Green | John S. Levy | |||
Carol N. Brown | Craig M. Hatkoff | Andrew W. Mathias | |||
Edwin T. Burton, III | |||||
| ● Our nominees represent a Board that has a diversity of knowledge, skills and experience, as well as diversity of age, gender and outlook. | ||||
● Each nominee has key skills that we believe are valuable to the effective oversight of the Company and the execution of our strategy. | |||||
| Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation ● At the heart of our executive compensation philosophy is a commitment to variable, incentive-based pay that strives to align stockholder value with the economic interests of our management team. ● We believe that our executive compensation programs provide appropriate performance-based | The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal. | |||
| |||||
Ratification of Independent Registered ● The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. ● The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued appointment of Ernst & Young LLP is in | The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal. | ||||
Approval of our Fifth Amended and Restated2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan ● On April 21, 2022, the Board voted to amend and restate our Fourth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Fourth Amended 2005 Plan”) to increase the number of shares available for issuance. ● The number of additional shares requested under our Fifth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Fifth Amended 2005 Plan”) is reasonable: 5,180,000 fungible units is equal to 2,000,000 full value awards. ● We believe that having an equity plan in place with a sufficient number of shares is critical to our ability to attract, retain and motivate employees in a highly competitive marketplace and ensure that our executive compensation is structured in a manner to align our executives’ interests with our stockholders. | The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS |
BUSINESS OVERVIEW AND HIGHLIGHTS
Our Mission
SL Green Realty Corp. is a self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, engaged in the acquisition, development, repositioning, ownership, management and operation of commercial and residential real estate properties, principally office properties, located in the New York metropolitan area, principally in Manhattan, a borough of New York City.
Who We Are(1)
$1.4 Billion
Combined Revenues
#1
Owner of Office
Property in Manhattan
34.9 Million
Total Square Feet(2)
$15.3 Billion
Enterprise Value
Stock Repurchase Activity
Demonstrates Continued
Confidence in SLG’s Long-
Term Value
Aggregate of $3.4B share
repurchases representing:
40.1 million
shares(3)
38.33%
of Outstanding Shares(4)
We differentiate ourselves from our peers and competitors in key ways:
Active, Responsible and Engaged Business Strategy
● | SLG does not subscribe to | hold” strategy and is a very active transaction-oriented company | |
● |
| We are focused, principally, on the Manhattan market where we have significant experience and valuable insights | |
We consider sustainability as a value driver and are committed to maintaining our ESG industry leadership by further reducing our environmental impact | |||
● |
| competitors over a much longer, multi-year period | |
● | Accordingly, we frequently capitalize on opportunities in the market, maximizing returns |
Value Creation Through All Economic Cycles
● | Our long-term investment strategy and intimate knowledge of Manhattan allows us the ability to source transactions with superior risk adjusted returns by capturing off-market opportunities |
● | The strength of our strategy is evidenced by our ability to not only continue to pay our ordinary dividend throughout the pandemic, but to increase dividends |
● | SLG increased its annualized dividend by 2.8% in 2021 and 2.5% in 2022 to $3.73 per share, marking the eleventh consecutive annual increase |
● | Additionally, following the brief suspension of our stock repurchase program early in the pandemic, we restarted the program in May 2020 and have completed approximately $882.0 million of repurchases and operating partnership unit redemptions since that time, bringing total repurchases and redemptions to approximately $3.4 billion. Our buyback program reflects the Board’s and management’s confidence in the Company’s prospects for the future |
(1) | Data as of 12/31/2021. |
(2) | Includes debt and preferred equity investments and suburban properties. |
(3) | Inclusive of OP unit redemptions as of 3/31/2022. |
(4) | Based on shares repurchased and OP units redeemed under the current $3.5B share repurchase program as of 3/31/2022 as a percentage of shares and OP units outstanding as of 6/30/16, just prior to approval and announcement of the plan. Not adjusted for capital change. |
4 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
STOCKHOLDER-FRIENDLY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT
SL Green has a history of strong corporate governance and stockholder-friendly practices.
| |||
| |||
43% | |||
of our independent Board members are diverse, including gender and racial/ethnic diversity | |||
| |||
| |||
2 SL Green Realty Corp.
2016 PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS
| |||
of our Board currently serve or have served on the Boards of other publicly traded companies | ||||||
Leadership | ||||||
Our Board members have strong leadership backgrounds, holding CEO, CFO or other executive positions | ||||||
90% | ||||||
of our Board currently serve or have served as CEO or in senior leadership positions |
Annual Director Elections
Our directors are elected for one-year terms.
Majority Vote Standard with Director Resignation Policy
In an uncontested election (as is the case for this annual meeting), our bylaws provide that a majority of all the votes cast with respect to a nominee’s election is required for such nominee to be elected to serve on the Board.
Further, we have adopted a director resignation policy for directors who fail to receive majority support.
Stockholder Amendments to Bylaws | |||||
We provide stockholders the right to amend our bylaws by a majority vote without any ownership or holding period limitations. | |||||
Proxy Access | |||||
A stockholder |
|
|
2022 PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS | 5 |
Compensation Program Highlights
Simplified Pay Elements with Continued Emphasis on At-Risk Compensation
Updated in recent years and aligned with stockholder feedback, our compensation structure now includes just four pay elements:
Pay Element | Key Characteristics | |
Annual Base Salary | Represents the only fixed component | |
Annual Cash Bonus | Determined 100% formulaically for both our CEO and President based on weightings that directly correspond to our strategy | |
Performance-Based Equity Awards | Awards are 50% based on performance against annual operating goals, subject to a modifier based on absolute TSR over a three-year performance period Awards are 50% based on relative TSR over a three-year performance period | |
Time-Based Equity Awards | Multi-year time-based equity awards that vest based on continued service, and are subject to a no-sell restriction for three years after grant date |
Reaffirmed Commitment to Performance-Based Executive Compensation Philosophy
In direct response to stockholder feedback received during our 2021 fall and winter outreach to stockholders, the Compensation Committee has reaffirmed its commitment to our pre-pandemic executive compensation structure. At the heart of our executive compensation philosophy is a commitment to variable, incentive-based pay that aligns stockholder value with the economic interests of our management team. For 2021, approximately 72% of our CEO’s compensation and approximately 64% of the annual compensation paid to our other named executive officers was in the form of multi-year time-based and performance-based equity grants.
Majority of 2021 Pay at Risk
6 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
ESG HIGHLIGHTS
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
● ESG program oversight by the
● ESG platform is integrated throughout SL Green’s business, which has led to effective risk-management practices that influence corporate strategy and decision-making | Our disclosures are in line with the GRI, CDP, GRESB, SASB, and TCFD reporting frameworks and UN SDG guidelines ● SASB Disclosures since 2020, consistent with data reported to GRESB ● TCFD signatory in 2021 along with issuance of first formal TCFD report ● Annual ESG Report in accordance with GRI standards framework and CRE supplement ● Third-party assurance of environmental performance data |
Key ESG Achievements
ESG Risk Rating Top 15% of Most Favorable 2019–2021 | Green Star 2019–2021 “A” Rating on Public Disclosure 2017–2021 | FTSE4Good Index Constituent 2020–2021 | ||
91st Percentile among Global Peers Assessed | Top 25% of all Residential & Commercial REITs | R-Factor™ Score Outperformer 2020–2021 | ||
One Vanderbilt - 2021 ULI New York Award for Excellence in Development | One Vanderbilt — Only building worldwide to achieve LEED v3 Platinum and v4 Gold simultaneously | One Vanderbilt – Smart Building of the Year | ||
Partner of the Year | Gold Level 2020 | Changemaker Award 2018–2021 |
2016 Proxy Statement 3
2016 PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS
SL GREEN REALTY CORP. New York, New York 10017-3852 |
Stockholders are being asked to approve the adoption of our Fourth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, which the Board approved and unanimously recommends that stockholders approve. We believe that having an equity plan in place with a sufficient number of shares is critical to our ability to attract, retain and motivate employees in a highly competitive marketplace and ensure that our executive compensation is structured in a manner that aligns our executives’ interest with our success. The following highlights reasons why we believe stockholders should vote in favor of our Fourth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
|
4 SL Green Realty Corp.
SL GREEN REALTY CORP.420 Lexington AvenueNew York, New York10170-1881
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Date & Time | Location | Record Date | ||||||
June 1, 2022 10:00 AM, Eastern Time | The auditorium at One Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York | March 31, 2022 |
Dear Stockholder:
You are invited to attend the2016the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders of SL Green Realty Corp., a Maryland corporation, which will be held on Thursday, June2, 2016 at10:June 1, 2022 at 10:00 a.m., local time,Eastern Time in the auditorium at The Grand Hyatt New York,109 East42nd Street,One Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York,10017. TheYork. We strongly encourage you to vote your shares by proxy prior to the annual meeting.
Items of Business- the annual meeting will be held for the following purposes:
To elect the | |||||||
PAGE 9 ► | To hold an advisory vote on executive | ||||||
PAGE 41 ► | To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, | ||||||
PAGE 78 ► | To approve PAGE 80 ► | ||||||
Vote FOR | Vote FOR | Vote FOR | Vote FOR | ||||
In addition, stockholders may be asked to consider and vote upon any other matters that may properly be brought before the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Any action may be taken on the foregoing matters at the annual meeting on the date specified above, or on any date or dates to which the annual meeting may be adjourned, or to which the annual meeting may be postponed.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 31, 20162022 as the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
New York, New YorkApril22, 2016
Andrew S. Levine Secretary | ||
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Stockholder Meeting to be Held on June This proxy statement and our |
Voting
Your vote is very important to us. Please vote as soon as possible by one of the methods shown below:
By Internet Visit | By Telephone Call 1-800-454-8683 | ||
By Tablet or Smartphone Scan this QR code to vote with your mobile device |
Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please carefully read the proxy statement and other proxy materials and complete a proxy for your shares as soon as possible. You may authorize your proxy via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the website indicated in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that you received in the mail. You also may request a paper or an e-mail copy of our proxy materials and a paper proxy card at any time. If you attend the annual meeting, you may vote in personduring the annual meeting if you wish, even if you previously have submittedsigned and returned your proxy. However, pleaseproxy card. Please note that if your shares are held of record by a bank, broker or other nominee, andplease follow the instructions you wish to vote in person at the annual meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued inreceive from your name from such bank, broker or other nominee.nominee to have your shares voted.
2016 Proxy Statement 5
8
References in this proxy statement to “we,” “us,” “our,” “ours,” and the “Company” refer to SL Green Realty Corp., unless the context otherwise requires. This proxy statement and a form of proxy have been made available to our stockholders on the Internet and the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials has been mailed to stockholders on or about April22, 2016.
6 SL Green Realty Corp.
9
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
We are committed to operating our business under strong and accountable corporate governance practices. You are encouraged to visit the “Investors—Corporate Governance” section of our corporate website at http://www.slgreen.com to view or obtain copies of our committee charters, Code of Ethics, Governance Principles and director independence standards. The information found on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this proxy statement or any other report or document we file with, or furnish to, the SEC. You also may obtain, free of charge, a copy of the respective charters of our committees, Code of Ethics, Governance Principles and director independence standards by directing your request in writing to SL Green Realty Corp., 420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10170-1881, Attention: Investor Relations. Additional information relating to the corporate governance of the Company also is included in other sections of this proxy statement.
At the annual meeting, three directors will be elected to serve until the 2019annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualify. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated Edwin Thomas Burton, III, Craig M. Hatkoff, and Andrew W. Mathias10 directors for election to serve as its Class I directors. Messrs. Burton, Hatkoff,until the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify.
● John H. Alschuler | ● Lauren B. Dillard | ● John S. Levy |
● Betsy S. Atkins | ● Stephen L. Green | ● Andrew W. Mathias |
● Carol N. Brown | ● Craig M. Hatkoff | |
● Edwin T. Burton, III | ● Marc Holliday |
Each of the nominees is currently are serving as Class I directors. Each of Messrs. Burton, Hatkoff,a director, and Mathias has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve as a director if elected. However, if any of Messrs. Burton, Hatkoff, or Mathiasthe nominees is unable to accept election, proxies voted in favor of such nominee will be voted for the election of such other person as the Board nominates.nominates or the Board may reduce the size of the Board.
Majority Voting Standard
A majority of all the votes cast with respect to a nominee’s election is required for such nominee to be elected to serve on the Board. This means that the number of votes cast “for” a nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” such nominee, with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as a vote cast either “for” or “against” a nominee. For more information on the operation of our majority voting standard in director elections, see the section entitled “Our Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance—Majority Voting Standard and Director Resignation Policy.”
The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR”the election of Messrs. Alschuler, Burton, Green, Hatkoff, Holliday, Levy and |
10 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Information Regarding the Nominees and the Continuing DirectorsINFORMATION REGARDING THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES
The following table, matrix and biographical descriptions set forth certain information with respect to the nominees for election as Class I directors at the 20162022 annual meeting, and the continuing Class II and Class III directors whose terms expire at the annual meetings of stockholders in 2017 and 2018, respectively, based upon information furnished by each director.
Name | Age | Director Since | ||
Class I Nominees (terms will expire in2019) | ||||
Edwin Thomas Burton, III* | 73 | 1997 | ||
Craig M. Hatkoff* | 62 | 2011 | ||
Andrew W. Mathias | 42 | 2014 | ||
Class II Continuing Directors (terms will expire in2017) | ||||
Marc Holliday | 49 | 2001 | ||
John S. Levy* | 80 | 1997 | ||
Betsy Atkins* | 62 | 2015 | ||
Class III Continuing Directors (terms will expire in2018) | ||||
John H. Alschuler* | 68 | 1997 | ||
Stephen L. Green | 78 | 1997 |
Other Current Public Board | Committee Memberships | |||||||||||||
Name | Directorships | Age | Independent | Director Since | AC | CC | NCGC | EC | ||||||
John H. Alschuler | ● Xenia Hotels and Resorts ● The Macerich Company | 74 | 1997 | M | M | |||||||||
Betsy S. Atkins | ● Wynn Resorts Ltd. | 68 | 2015 | M | M | |||||||||
Carol N. Brown | 52 | 2022 | M | |||||||||||
Edwin T. Burton, III | 79 | 1997 | C | M | ||||||||||
Lauren B. Dillard | 46 | 2016 | M | C | ||||||||||
Stephen L. Green | 84 | 1997 | M | |||||||||||
Craig M. Hatkoff | ● Jaguar Global Growth Corporation I | 68 | 2011 | M | C | |||||||||
Marc Holliday | 55 | 2001 | C | |||||||||||
John S. Levy | 86 | 1997 | M | M | ||||||||||
Andrew W. Mathias | 48 | 2014 |
* Independent Director
2016 Proxy Statement 7
C= Chair | AC= Audit Committee | NCGC= Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
M= Member | CC= Compensation Committee | EC= Executive Committee |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Class I Nominees—Terms Will Expire in 2019
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
The matrix below represents some of the key skills that our Board has identified as particularly valuable to the effective oversight of the Company and the execution of our strategy. This matrix highlights the depth and breadth of skills of our directors.
Alschuler | | Brown | Burton, III | Dillard | Green | Hatkoff | Holliday | Levy | Mathias | |||
Executive Leadership | ||||||||||||
Finance/Capital Markets | ||||||||||||
Risk Management | ||||||||||||
Public Company Board Service/Corporate Governance | ||||||||||||
REIT/Real Estate Industry | ||||||||||||
Experience Over Several Business Cycles | ||||||||||||
Talent Management | ||||||||||||
Academia | ||||||||||||
Accounting | ||||||||||||
Government/Regulatory Experience | ||||||||||||
Technology/Cybersecurity | ||||||||||||
Diversity |
Our Board currently includes three female directors, including one racially/ethnically diverse director.
12 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Director Nominees
JOHN H. Lead Independent Director Since: 1997 Age: 74 SL Green Board Service ● Nominating ● Executive | ||
Mr. Alschuler’s achievements in academia and business, as well as his extensive knowledge of commercial real estate, New York City’s economy, commercial and other markets in New York City and national and international markets for real estate, and his expertise in inter-governmental relations, allow him to assess the real estate market and the Company’s business from a knowledgeable and informed perspective, from which he provides valuable insights into the Company’s business.
Professional Experience
● | Executive Chair of Therme North America, an entity which designs, builds and operates large scale well-being facilities, since 2022 |
● | Chair of HR&A Advisors Inc., an economic development, real-estate and public policy consulting organization, from 2008 to 2021 |
● | Adjunct Associate Professor, Graduate School of Architecture, Planning & Preservation at Columbia University, teaching real estate development |
● | Board of Directors of the Center for an Urban Future, Friends of the High Line Inc., and the Sag Harbor Cinema Arts Center, each a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization |
● | B.A. degree from Wesleyan University and Ed.D. degree from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst |
Other Public Board Directorships
● | Xenia Hotels and Resorts, Inc. since 2015 |
● | The Macerich Company since 2015 |
Skills, Experiences and Attributes
Executive Leadership | |
Risk Management | |
REIT/Real Estate Industry | |
Talent Management | |
Government/Regulatory Experience |
Finance/Capital Markets | |
Public Company Board Service/Corporate Governance | |
Experience Over Several Business Cycles | |
Academia |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 13 |
BETSY S. Independent Director Director Since: 2015 Age: 68 SL Green Board Service ● Audit Committee ● Nominating | ||
Ms. Atkins has deep expertise in many areas, including executive leadership and operational experience in various technology, durable goods, energy efficiency infrastructure and retail industries, as well as significant public board experience, which gives her broad experience and thought leadership in corporate governance matters generally, including executive compensation and evolving best practices in sustainability and enterprise risk management.
Professional Experience
● | Chief Executive Officer of Baja Corp, an independent venture capital firm focused on technology, renewable energy and life sciences industries, since 1994 |
● | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Clear Standards, Inc., a provider of energy management solutions, from February 2009 to August 2009, when Clear Standards was acquired by SAP AG, a business software company |
● | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of NCI, Inc., a functional food/nutraceutical company, from 1991 to 1993 |
● | Co-founded Ascend Communications, Inc. in 1989, member of its Board of Directors and Executive Vice President of sales, marketing, professional services and international operations prior to its acquisition by Lucent Technologies |
● | Formerly an advisor to SAP SE, an advisor to British Telecom and a presidential-appointee to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation advisory committee |
● | Former member of the Board of Directors of Covetrus, Inc., February 2019 to September 2019; Schneider Electric, SA, April 2011 to April 2019; Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, April 2017 to October 2018; HD Supply, Inc., September 2013 to April 2018; Polycom, Inc., 1999 to April 2016; Darden Restaurants, Inc., October 2014 to September 2015 |
● | B.A. from the University of Massachusetts |
Other Public Board Directorships
● | Wynn Resorts Ltd. since April 2018 |
Skills, Experiences and Attributes
Executive Leadership | |
Risk Management | |
Experience Over Several Business Cycles | |
Technology/Cybersecurity |
Finance/Capital Markets | |
Public Company Board Service/Corporate Governance | |
Accounting | |
Diversity |
14 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CAROL N.
Independent Director Director Since: 2022 Age: 52 SL Green Board Service ● Nominating | ||
Ms. Brown’s extensive experience in academia, including teaching and writing in the areas of property, land use planning, real estate transactions, and housing law, bring a unique and valuable perspective to the Board.
Professional Experience
● | Professor at the University of Richmond School of Law since 2012, teaching Property Law Survey, Housing Law, Land Use Planning, and Real Estate Transactions |
● | Former Professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law from 2008 to 2012 and Associate Professor from 2007 to 2008 |
● | Former Associate Professor of Law at the University of Alabama School of Law, and Assistant Professor from 2001 to 2004 |
● | Former Associate at Sirote & Permutt, P.C. in Birmingham, Alabama focusing on general business, real estate, and consumer finance |
● | Former Associate at McGuire, Woods, Battle & Bootle, L.L.P. in Richmond, Virginia focusing on labor and employment discrimination |
● | Former Judicial Law Clerk for the Honorable Sharon L. Blackburn, United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama |
● | B.A. from Duke University and J.D./L.L.M. from Duke University School of Law |
Skills, Experiences and Attributes
Risk Management | |
Academia | |
Technology/Cybersecurity |
REIT/Real Estate Industry | |
Government/Regulatory Experience | |
Diversity |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 15 |
EDWIN T. Independent Director Director Since: 1997 Age: 79 SL Green Board Service ● Audit Committee, ● Compensation | ||
In addition to his experience in academia as a seasoned professor of economics, Mr. Burton’s extensive skills and experience in corporate governance, financial, compensation and legal matters allow him to provide valuable financial expertise and insights into the Company’s business.
Professional Experience
● | Professor of Economics at the University of Virginia |
● | Consultant to numerous companies on investment strategy and investment banking |
● | Member of the Board of Trustees of the Virginia Retirement System for state and local employees of the Commonwealth of Virginia from 1994 to 2001 and then again from 2004 to 2014, and served as its Chairman from 1997 until March |
● | Senior Vice President, Managing Director and director of Interstate Johnson Lane, Incorporated, an investment banking firm, where he was in charge of the Corporate Finance and Public Finance |
● | President of Rothschild Financial Services, Incorporated (a subsidiary of Rothschild, Inc. of North America), an investment banking company headquartered in New York City that is involved in proprietary trading, securities lending and other investment |
● | Consultant to the American Stock Exchange from 1985 |
● | Senior vice president with Smith Barney (or its corporate predecessor) from 1976 |
● | Member of the Board of Directors of Chase Investors, a privately-held registered investment |
● | Former member of the Board of Directors of Capstar Hotel Company, a publicly-traded hotel company, Virginia National Bank, a publicly-traded commercial bank, and SNL Securities, a private securities data |
● | B.A. degree in Economics from Rice University and |
Skills, Experiences and Attributes
Executive Leadership | ||
Risk Management | ||
Experience Over Several Business Cycles | ||
Accounting |
Finance/Capital Markets | |
Public Company Board Service/Corporate Governance | |
Academia |
16 | |
Independent Director Director Since: 2016 Age: 46 SL Green Board Service: ● Audit Committee ● Compensation | ||
Ms. Dillard’s sophisticated understanding of tax, real estate, investment programs, finance, compensation and corporate governance, all viewed through the lens of over fifteen years of global private equity experience and together with her considerable operational expertise, provides the Board and the Company with deep and practical insight on a broad range of matters.
Professional Experience
● | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Managing Director of Vista Equity Partners, a leading global investment firm focused exclusively on enterprise software, data and technology-enabled businesses, since April 2022 |
● | Executive Vice President of Investment Intelligence of Nasdaq, Inc., a global technology firm serving the capital markets and other industries, from June 2019 to April 2022 |
● | Managing Director for the Carlyle Group, a global alternative asset manager, from 2011 to May 2019, head of Carlyle’s Investment Solutions Group since December 2015 and member of Carlyle’s Management Committee; joined Carlyle in 2002 |
● | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Carlyle’s Investment Solutions Group from 2013 to December 2015; former head of Global Tax Department and head of Global Equity Programs; and member of Carlyle’s Transaction Team where she played a significant role in transactions, including Carlyle’s initial public offering |
● | Served in the Real Estate and Financial Services Group of the Tax Practice of Arthur Andersen, LLP prior to 2002 |
● | Current Executive Sponsor for the Women’s Initiative at Nasdaq, member of the Private Equity Women Investor Network (PEWIN) and other women in finance industry initiatives |
● | B.S. in business administration from the University of Richmond |
Skills, Experiences and Attributes
Executive Leadership | |
Risk Management | |
REIT/Real Estate Industry | |
Talent Management | |
Technology/Cybersecurity |
Finance/Capital Markets | |
Public Company Board Service/Corporate Governance | |
Experience Over Several Business Cycles | |
Accounting | |
Diversity |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 17 |
STEPHEN L. Director Director Since: 1997 Age: 84 SL Green Board Service ● Executive | ||
In addition to his industry-wide reputation, Mr. Green’s extensive skills and experience in real estate, including founding our predecessor, provide him with invaluable knowledge of and expertise in our business and industry. This experience, particularly his experience having led our predecessor and the Company, contributes depth and context to the Board’s discussions of the Company’s business.
Professional Experience
● | Chairman Emeritus at the Company since January 2019 |
● | Chairman of the Board of the Company from 1997 through January 2019 |
● | Former executive officer working in conjunction with our Chief Executive Officer and overseeing the Company’s long-term strategic direction; formerly served as our Chief Executive Officer |
● | Founded our predecessor, S.L. Green Properties, Inc., in 1980; prior to our initial public offering in 1997, Mr. Green was involved in the acquisition of over 50 Manhattan office buildings containing in excess of 10.0 million square feet |
● | Chairman of the Board of Gramercy Capital Corp. from August 2004 to June 2009 |
● | At-large member of the Executive Committee of the Board of Governors of the Real Estate Board of New York |
● | Member of the Board of Directors of Streetsquash, Inc., a Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization |
● | Previously member of the Board of Directors of Stemedica Cell Technologies, Inc., August 2007 to April 2009; Chairman of the Real Estate Board of New York’s Tax Committee |
● | B.A. degree from Hartwick College and J.D. degree from Boston College Law School |
Skills, Experiences and Attributes
Executive Leadership | |
Risk Management | |
Experience Over Several Business Cycles | |
Government/Regulatory Experience |
Finance/Capital Markets | |
REIT/Real Estate Industry | |
Talent Management |
18 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
CRAIG M. Independent Director Director Since: 2011 Age: 68 SL Green Board Service ● Audit Committee ● Nominating | ||
Mr. Hatkoff has in-depth expertise and knowledge of real estate, capital markets, finance, private investing, entrepreneurship and executive management through his work with Chemical Bank, Victor Capital Group and Capital Trust. As a result of the foregoing, Mr. Hatkoff provides a unique insight into the financial markets generally, valuation analysis, strategic planning, and unique financing structures and alternatives. He also possesses entrepreneurial, brand marketing, social media, technology and innovation, and senior leadership experience through his private investments and service on the Boards of numerous educational and charitable organizations. Mr. Hatkoff also has extensive Board and Board committee experience at other public companies, including his prior service at Taubman Centers, Inc. and his long-standing service to Capital Trust, Inc., which enables him to provide significant insight as to governance and compliance-related matters particular to real estate companies.
Professional Experience
● | Vice Chairman of Capital Trust, Inc., a real estate investment management company that was listed on the New York Stock Exchange, |
● | Trustee of the New York City School Construction Authority, the agency responsible for the construction of all public schools in New York |
● | Founder and a managing partner of Victor Capital Group, L.P. |
● | Former co-head of the real estate investment banking unit at Chemical Bank, where he was a pioneer in commercial mortgage |
● | Co-founder of the Tribeca Film |
● | Adjunct Professor at Columbia Business School
|
8 SL Green Realty Corp.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
| ||
● | Former member of the Board of Directors of Taubman Centers, Inc., |
Other Public Board Directorships
● | Jaguar Global Growth Corporation I since February 2022 |
Skills, Experiences and Attributes
Executive Leadership | |
Risk Management | |
REIT/Real Estate Industry | |
Talent Management | |
Accounting |
Finance/Capital Markets | |
Public Company Board Service/Corporate Governance | |
Experience Over Several Business Cycles | |
Academia | |
Technology/Cybersecurity |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 19 |
MARC
Chief Executive Director Since: 2001 Age: 55 SL Green ● Executive | ||
Mr. Holliday’s extensive experience and skills in real estate and finance, as well as his role as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, provide him with valuable knowledge of and expertise in our business and industry. Furthermore, Mr. Holliday’s presence on the Board facilitates communication between the Board and the Company’s senior management.
Professional Experience
● | Chief Executive Officer of | |
● | ||
● | President and Chief Executive Officer of Gramercy | |
● | Managing Director and Head of Direct Originations for New York-based Capital Trust Inc., a mezzanine finance company, where he was in charge of originating direct principal investments for the firm, consisting of mezzanine debt, preferred equity and first | |
● | Served in various management positions, including Senior Vice President at Capital Trust, Inc.’s predecessor, Victor Capital Group, L.P. | |
● | Member of the Board of Directors of NYRA and | |
● | B.S. degree in Business and Finance from Lehigh University in 1988 and |
2016Proxy Statement Skills, Experiences and Attributes9
Executive Leadership | |
Risk Management | |
Experience Over Several Business Cycles | |
Government/Regulatory Experience |
Finance/Capital Markets | |
REIT/Real Estate Industry | |
Talent Management |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
JOHN S.
Independent Director Director Since: 1997 Age: 86 SL Green Board Service ● Nominating ● Compensation | ||
Mr. Levy’s extensive skills, experience and sophistication in corporate governance, financial, compensation, legal and commercial matters, including his corporate finance expertise developed at Lehman Brothers, allow him to provide valuable insights into the Company’s business and finances.
Professional Experience
● | Retired from Lehman Brothers Inc. in |
● | Associated with A.G. Becker Incorporated (or its predecessors) from 1960 |
● | B.A. degree from Dartmouth College. |
Skills, Experiences and Attributes
Executive Leadership | ||
| ||
Risk Management | ||
Experience Over Several Business Cycles |
Finance/Capital Markets | |
Public Company Board Service/Corporate Governance | |
Talent Management |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | |
| ||
Mr. Mathias’ extensive experience in real estate, including commercial real estate investment, and in-depth knowledge of the New York City real estate market, as well as his role as President of the Company, provide him with valuable knowledge of our business and industry. Furthermore, Mr. Mathias’ presence on the Board facilitates communication between the Board and the Company’s senior management.
Professional Experience
● | President of the |
● | Joined the Company in March 1999 as Vice President and was promoted to Director of Investments in 2002 |
● | Chief Investment Officer of the Company from January 2004 until January 2011 |
● | Chief Investment Officer of Gramercy Capital Corp. from August 2004 |
● | Worked at Capital Trust, Inc. and its predecessor, Victor Capital Group, L.P. |
● | Worked on the |
● | Member of the Board of Directors for the Regional Plan Association, which works to improve the prosperity, infrastructure, sustainability and quality of |
● | B.S. degree in Economics from the Wharton School at the University of |
10Skills, Experiences and AttributesSL Green Realty Corp.
Executive Leadership | |
Risk Management | |
Experience Over Several Business Cycles | |
Government/Regulatory Experience |
Finance/Capital Markets | |
REIT/Real Estate Industry | |
Talent Management |
22 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Director Succession PlanningBoard Refreshment and Diversity
Led by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board remains focusedengages in ongoing director succession planning, including a focus on refreshing the membership and leadership of the Board and its membership. Our goal isCommittees and enhancing the level of diversity. In January 2019, the leadership of the Board was transitioned from Stephen L. Green, our founder and Chairman of the Board for over 20 years, to ensure that, takenMarc Holliday, who also serves as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Green continues to serve as a whole,director and as our Chairman Emeritus.
In March 2022, we added Carol N. Brown to our Board as an independent director. With her addition, three of our directors are women, including one racially/ethnically diverse director. We continue seeking to further enhance the diversity of perspectives on the Board, has the desired mix of expertise, experience, reputation and diversity necessary for us to continue to deliver superior performance in a highly competitive marketplace, as well as the knowledge, ability and independence to continue to deliver the high standard of governance expected by our investors. Over the last several years, we have added new independentpotentially through additional directors to the Board, most recently including the addition of Craig M. Hatkoff in 2011 and Betsy Atkins in 2015. In furtherancethat contribute ethnic/racial diversity. As part of our goals, we also intend to identify and have a new independent director join the Board in 2017.succession planning, contingent upon his election at our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, Mr. Levy will retire from our Board at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.
Diversity | Experience | Leadership | ||||||
Our Board has a diversity of knowledge, skills and experience, as well as diversity of age, gender and outlook | Our Board members have broad experience serving on public boards in industries relevant to the Company | Our Board members have strong corporate leadership backgrounds such as being CEO, CFO or holding other Executive positions | ||||||
43% | 60% | 90% | ||||||
of our independent Board members are diverse, including gender and racial/ethnic diversity | of our Board currently serve or have served on the Boards of other publicly traded companies | of our Board currently serve or have served as CEO or in senior leadership positions | ||||||
Identification of Director Candidates
HOW WE IDENTIFY AND CONSIDER DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
Identify Potential Candidates | Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee solicits and considers suggestions from our directors and management regarding possible nominees. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also may procure the services of outside sources or third parties to assist in the identification of director candidates. Candidates may also be identified by stockholders. | ||
In-Depth Committee Review | The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee: ● Considers experience, qualifications, and diversity, including ethnic/racial diversity ● Meets with candidates and conducts interviews — In considering a potential nominee, each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has the opportunity to interview potential nominees in person or by telephone and to submit questions to such potential candidate. ● Review independence and potential conflicts | ||
Recommend Candidates to Full Board | The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee presents potential candidates to full Board for open discussion. | ||
Review by Full Board | The full Board is responsible for approving potential candidates. |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 23 |
NCGC Director Recruitment Process
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in identifying and reviewing director candidates to determine whether they qualify for membership on the Board and recommends director nominees to the Board to be considered for election at our annual meeting of stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee adopted a written policy on the criteria and process of identifying and reviewing director candidates.
Each director candidate must have (1) education and experience that provides knowledge of business, financial, governmental or legal matters that are relevant to the Company’s business or to its status as a publicly owned company, (2) an unblemished reputation for integrity, (3) a reputation for exercising good business judgment and (4) sufficient available time to be able to fulfill his or her responsibilities as a member of the Board and of any committees to which he or she may be appointed.have:
In making recommendations to the Board, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers such factors as it deems appropriate. These factors may include judgment, skill, diversity (including diversity of knowledge, skills, professional experience, education, expertise and representation in industries relevant to the Company), ability to bring new perspectives and add to Board discussion and consideration, experience with businesses and other organizations comparable to the Company (including experience managing public companies, marketing experience or experience determining compensation of officers of public companies), the interplay of the candidate’s experience with the experience of other Board members, the candidate’s industry knowledge and experience, the ability of a nominee to devote sufficient time to the affairs of the Company, any actual or potential conflicts of interest and whether the candidate meets the NYSE independence criteria, the extent to which the candidate generally would be a desirable addition to the Board and any committees of the Board, qualifications to serve on appropriate Board committees (including financial acumen), technological literacy, strategic insight, familiarity with desired markets or regions, ability to make independent and analytical judgments, ability to introduce the Company to business or other opportunities, reputation in the corporate governance community, personal rapport with senior officers of the Company, risk management skills and effective communication skills. Such matters are considered in light of the skills, qualifications and diversity of the other members of the Board.
1. | education and experience that provides knowledge of business, financial, governmental or legal matters that are relevant to the Company’s business or to its status as a publicly owned company; |
2. | an unblemished reputation for integrity; |
3. | a reputation for exercising good business judgment; and |
4. | sufficient available time to be able to fulfill his or her responsibilities as a member of the Board and of any committees to which he or she may be appointed. |
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ensures that the potential nominee is not an employee or agent of and does not serve on the board of directors or similar managing body of any of our competitors and determines whether the potential nominee has an interest in any transactions to which we are a party.
Prior to a vote as to whether a potential nominee is recommendedIn making recommendations to the Board, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers such factors as it deems appropriate, in light of Directors, each memberthe skills, qualifications and background of the Board’s current composition and the opportunities and challenges the Board anticipates in the future. Such factors include diversity of perspectives, including with respect to gender, race and ethnicity. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider the following:
● | the candidate’s industry knowledge and experience; |
● | any actual or potential conflicts of interest and whether the candidate meets the NYSE independence criteria; |
● | the extent to which the candidate generally would be a desirable addition to the Board and any committees of the Board; |
● | qualifications to serve on appropriate Board committees (including financial acumen); |
● | technological literacy; |
● | strategic insight; |
● | ability to introduce the Company to business or other opportunities; |
● | reputation in the corporate governance community; |
● | risk management skills; and |
● | the candidate’s knowledge in the area of cybersecurity. |
Most recently, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is provided reasonable accessengaged Spencer Stuart to suchhelp us identify potential nominee. Such access includes a reasonable opportunitynominees to interview suchour Board and requested that Spencer Stuart present diverse candidates in their slate of recommendations, including gender and ethnic/racial diversity. We appointed Carol N. Brown to our Board in March 2022.
Role of Third Party Advisors in Director Recruitment Process
FTI Consulting, Inc., or FTI Consulting, and Spencer Stuart have assisted us in the initial search, screening, interviewing and vetting of potential nominee in person or by telephone and to submit questions to such potential candidate. In addition, each potential nominee provides thenew directors. FTI Consulting worked closely with our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in connection with a written detailed biographythe additions of Craig Hatkoff in 2011, Betsy S. Atkins in 2015 and identify on which committees of the Board, if any, the potential nominee would be willing to serve.
OurLauren B. Dillard in 2016, and Spencer Stuart worked closely with our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may solicit and consider suggestionsin connection with the addition of our directors or management regarding possible nominees. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also may procure the servicesCarol N. Brown in 2022 (who was initially recommended for consideration by Mr. Burton).
Stockholder Recommendations of outside sources or third parties to assist in the identification of director candidates.Director Candidates
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider director candidates recommended by our stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will apply the same standards in considering candidates submitted by stockholders as it does in evaluating candidates submitted by members of the Board.all other candidates. Any recommendations by stockholders are to follow the procedures outlined under “Other Information—Other Matters—Stockholder Proposals and Nominations” in this proxy statement and should provide the reasons supporting a candidate’s recommendation, the candidate’s qualifications and the candidate’s written consent to being considered as a director nominee.
2016 Proxy Statement 11
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
24 |
BOARD STRUCTURE AND INDEPENDENCE
Board Leadership Structure
The Board currently consists of eight membersten members. The current leadership structure of the Board consists of Marc Holliday, who serves as the Chairman of the Board and is divided into three classes. Directors in each class serve for a term of three years and until their successors are duly elected and qualify. The term of directors of one class expires at each annual meeting of stockholders.
Board Leadership Structure;our Chief Executive Officer, John Alschuler, who serves as our Lead Independent Director,
As noted above, and the independent directors who serve as Chairs for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board. With over 17 years of experience leading the Company, Mr. Holliday is uniquely qualified to serve as the Chairman of the Board, currently is comprised of five independent and three employee directors.the Board believes that Mr. Green has servedHolliday’s combined role as Chairman of the Board since1997 and serves as an executive officer. Chief Executive Officer, together with the participation of other members of management and independent directors in its leadership structure, helps promote unified leadership and direction for the Company and the Board while also ensuring appropriate independent oversight of management by the Board.
Lead Independent Director
The Board has appointed Mr. Alschuler, onebelieves that having a Lead Independent Director improves the overall functioning of the Board and strengthens the ability of the independent directors as Lead Independent Director. We believe that the number of independent, experienced directors that make up the Board, along with theto effectively exercise independent oversight of ourmanagement during periods when the Chairman of the Board is not an independent director. The Lead Independent Director benefitsis appointed by the Companyindependent directors on the Board, and its stockholders.
We recognizehas a number of responsibilities that different board leadership structures may be appropriate for companies in different situations,help facilitate communication among our independent directors and that no one structure is suitable for all companies. Our current Board leadership structure is optimal for us because it demonstrates tobetween our employeesindependent directors and other stakeholders that the Company is under strong leadership, coordinated closely between a separateour Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, and ensure appropriate independent oversight of management by the Board. In our judgment, the Company, like many companies, has been well-served by this leadership structure.
JOHN H. Lead Independent Director since 2010 | |||
Role of the Lead Independent Director In addition to presiding at executive sessions of independent directors, the Lead Independent Director has the responsibility to: | ||
1. | consult with the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer as to an appropriate schedule and agenda for each Board meeting, seeking to ensure that the independent directors can perform their duties effectively and responsibly; | |
2. | ensure that the independent directors have adequate resources, especially by way of full, timely and relevant information to support their decision making; | |
3. | advise the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the information submitted by the Company’s management that is necessary or appropriate for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties; | |
4. | recommend to the Board and the Board Committees the retention of advisers and consultants who report directly to the Board; | |
5. | ensure that independent directors have adequate opportunities to meet and discuss issues in sessions of the independent directors without management present and, as appropriate, call meetings of the Independent Directors; | |
6. | serve as Chairman of the sessions of the independent directors; | |
7. | serve as principal liaison between the independent directors and the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company and between the independent directors and senior management; | |
8. | communicate to management, as appropriate, the results of private discussions among independent directors; | |
9. | chair the meetings of the Board when the Chairman is not present; | |
10. | with respect to questions and comments directed to the Lead Independent Director or to the independent directors as a group, determine the appropriate means of response, with such consultation with the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman and other directors as the Lead Independent Director may deem appropriate; and | |
11. | perform such other duties as the Board from time to time may delegate. |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 25 |
Board and theCommittee Self-Evaluations
The Board Committees the retention of advisersbelieves that good governance can only be achieved through rigorous self-evaluation. Each year, our Nominating and consultants who report directly to theCorporate Governance Committee establishes formal self-assessment procedures that are consistent with our Governance Principles, NYSE listing requirements and best practices identified during prior self-evaluations. The Board (5) ensure that independent directors have adequate opportunities to meet and discuss issues in sessions of the independent directors without management present and, as appropriate, call meetings of the Independent Directors, (6) serve as Chairman of the sessions of the independent directors, (7) serve as principal liaison between the independent directors and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and between the independent directors and senior management, (8) communicate to management, as appropriate, the results of private discussions among independent directors, (9) chair the meetings of the Board when the Chairman is not present, (10) with respect to questions and comments directed to the Lead Independent Director or to the independent directors as a group, determine the appropriate means of response, with such consultation with the Chief Executive Officer and other directors as the Lead Independent Director may deem appropriate and (11) perform such other duties as the Board from time to time may delegate. Mr. Alschuler serves as the Lead Independent Director.
Throughout the year, the Board discusses corporate governance practicesalso engages with stockholders and third party advisers throughout the year to discuss corporate governance practices, and to ensure that the Board and its committees follow practices that are optimal for the Company and its stockholders while also delivering superior total return. As part of this process, the
Board conducts an annual evaluation in order to determine whether it and its committees function effectively, with independent directors meeting separately with outside counsel. The discussion with stockholders, as well as the evaluations, are the basis for the Board’s annual review of possible changes to the Company’s corporate governance practices. Our Governance Principles provide the flexibility for the Board to modify our leadership structure as the Board deems appropriate.Evaluation Process
Initiate Process NCGC establishes Board and committee self-evaluation process, including incorporation of process improvements from previous review cycles | Conduct Evaluation Directors meet to formally discuss the functioning of the Board and any committees on which they serve to identify areas for improvement. Independent directors meet separately with outside counsel. | Implement Conclusions The Board and each committee implement proposed governance improvements with assistance of management and third party advisors, as needed | ||
Director Independence
Our Governance Principles provide that a majority of our directors serving on the Board must be independent as required by the listing standards of the NYSE and the applicable rules promulgated by the SEC.NYSE. In addition, the Board adopted director independence standards that assist the Board in making its determinations with respect to the independence of directors. The Board determined affirmatively, based upon its review ofhas reviewed all relevant facts and circumstances and after consideringconsidered all applicable relationships of which the Board had knowledge, between or among the directors and the Company or our management (some of such relationships are described in the section of this proxy statement entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions”),. Based upon this review, the Board has determined that each of the following directors and director nominees has no direct or indirect material relationship with us and is independent under the listing standards of the NYSE the applicable rules promulgated by the SEC and our director independence standards: Ms.Mses. Betsy S. Atkins, Carol N. Brown and Lauren B. Dillard and Messrs. John H. Alschuler, Edwin T. Burton, III, John H. Alschuler,Craig M. Hatkoff and John S. Levy and Craig M. Hatkoff.Levy. The Board has determined that Messrs. Stephen L. Green, Marc Holliday and Andrew W. Mathias, our three other directors, are not independent because they are also executive officers of the Company.independent.
12 SL Green Realty Corp.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors
Our Governance Principles require the non-management directors serving on the Board to meet in an executive session at least annually without the presence of any directors or other persons who are part of our management. In accordance with such requirement, the independent directors who currently comprise all of the non-management directors, meet in executive sessions from time to time on such a basis. The executive sessions are regularly chaired by our Lead Independent Director.
26 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Communications with the Board
We have a process by which stockholders and/or other parties may communicate with the Board, individual directors (including the independent directors) or independent directors as a group. Any such communications may be sent to the Board or any named individual director (including the independent directors), by U.S. mail or overnight delivery and should be directed to Andrew S. Levine, Secretary, at SL Green Realty Corp., 420 LexingtonOne Vanderbilt Avenue, 28th Floor, New York, New York 10170-1881.10017-3852. Mr. Levine forwards all such communications to the intended recipient or recipients. Any such communications may be made anonymously.
Director Attendance
The Board held fourfive meetings during fiscal year 20152021, and all directors attended 75% or more of the board of directorsBoard meetings and meetings of the committees on which they served during the periods they served.served during fiscal year 2021, with the exception of Ms. Atkins who attended 67% of meetings held during 2021. Ms. Atkins’s absences were due primarily to an illness in December 2021, which caused her to be unable to attend both a meeting of the Board and a meeting of the Audit Committee held on the same day, as well as emergency family circumstances arising during the course of 2021 that rendered her unable to attend additional meetings of the Audit Committee. Ms. Atkins has a long history of diligent service on not only our Board but also the boards of numerous other public companies. Notwithstanding her absences, Ms. Atkins was an engaged and valuable member of our Board during 2021, and we believe Ms. Atkins’s reduced attendance during 2021 to be an anomaly resulting from illness and other unforeseeable impediments that Ms. Atkins does not expect will recur in the future. In addition to participating in formal meetings, our Board members regularly communicate with each other, members of management and advisors and take action by written consent.
We encourage each member of the Board to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. FourTwo of our directors attended the annual meeting of stockholders held on June 4, 2015.8, 2021.
The Board has four standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and an Executive Committee. The current charters for each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are available on our corporate website at www.slgreen.com under the “Investors—Corporate Governance” section. Further, we will provide a copy of these charters without charge to each stockholder upon written request. Requests for copies should be addressed to Andrew S. Levine, Secretary, at SL Green Realty Corp., 420 LexingtonOne Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10170-1881.10017-3852. From time to time, the Board also may create additional committees for such purposes as the Board may determine.
Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee consists of Betsy Atkins, Edwin Thomas Burton, III (Chairman), Craig M. Hatkoff and John S. Levy, each of whom is “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE and the SEC and each of whom meets the financial literacy standard required by the rules of the NYSE. Our Audit Committee’s primary purpose is to select and appoint our independent registered public accounting firm and to assist the Board in its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements; the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; the qualifications and independence of the registered public accounting firm employed by the Company for the audit of the Company’s financial statements; the performance of the people responsible for the Company’s internal audit function; and the performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Our Audit Committee also prepares the report that the rules of the SEC require be included in this proxy statement and provides an open avenue of communication among the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, its internal auditors, its management and the Board. Our management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements and for the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Management is responsible for maintaining appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles and policies and internal controls and procedures that provide for compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for planning and carrying out a proper audit of our annual financial statements prior to the filing of our Annual Report
2016 Proxy Statement 13
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
| 27 |
AUDIT
Members Edwin T. Burton, III Meetings in 2021: 12 | |||
Principal Responsibilities: Our Audit Committee’s primary purposes are to: | ||
● | Select and appoint our independent registered public accounting firm | |
● | Assist the Board in its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements; the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; the qualifications and independence of the registered public accounting firm employed by the Company for the audit of the Company’s financial statements; the performance of the people responsible for the Company’s internal audit function; and the performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm | |
● | Prepare the report that is required to be included in this proxy statement by the rules of the SEC | |
● | Provide an open avenue of communication among the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, its internal auditors, its management and the Board | |
Each member of the Audit Committee is independent within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE and the SEC and each of them meets the financial literacy standard required by the rules of the NYSE. Additional information regarding the functions performed by our Audit Committee is set forth in the “Audit Committee Report” included in this annual proxy statement. Audit Committee Financial Expert The Board determined that Edwin T. Burton, III qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined in Item 407(d) of SEC Regulation S-K. | ||
Our management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements and for the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Management is responsible for maintaining appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles and policies and internal controls and procedures that provide for compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for planning and carrying out a proper audit of our annual financial statements prior to the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, reviewing our quarterly financial statements prior to the filing of each Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and annually auditing the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and other procedures. |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
28 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
COMPENSATION Members Lauren B. Dillard (Chair) Meetings in 2021: 2 In addition to participating in formal meetings, our Compensation Committee members regularly communicate with each other, members of management and advisors and take action by written consent. | |||
Principal Responsibilities: Our Compensation Committee’s primary purposes are to: | ||
● | Determine how the Company’s Chief Executive Officer should be compensated | |
● | Administer the Company’s employee benefit plans and executive compensation programs | |
● | Determine compensation of our executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer | |
● | Produce the report on executive compensation that is required to be included in this proxy statement | |
● | Solicit recommendations, with respect to the compensation of our executive officers, from our Chief Executive Officer regarding total compensation for all executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer and review his recommendations in terms of total compensation and the allocation of such compensation among base salary, annual bonus amounts and other long-term incentive compensation as well as the allocation of such items between cash and equity compensation | |
Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE. | ||
Our Compensation Committee retained Gressle & McGinley LLC as its independent outside compensation consulting firm and engaged Gressle & McGinley LLC to provide our Compensation Committee with relevant data concerning the marketplace, our peer group and its own independent analysis and recommendations concerning executive compensation. Gressle & McGinley LLC regularly participates in Compensation Committee meetings. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 29 |
NOMINATING Members Craig M. Hatkoff (Chair) Meetings in 2021: 1 In addition to participating in formal meetings, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members regularly communicate with each other, members of management and advisors and take action by written consent. | |||
Principal Responsibilities Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s primary purposes are to: | ||
● | Identify individuals qualified to fill vacancies or newly-created positions on the Board | |
● | Recommend to the Board the persons it should nominate for election as directors at annual meetings of the Company’s stockholders | |
● | Recommend directors to serve on all committees of the Board | |
● | Develop and recommend to the Board governance principles applicable to the Company | |
Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE. |
EXECUTIVE Members Marc Holliday (Chair) Meetings in 2021: 0 Our Executive Committee did not take any actions by written consent during fiscal year 2021, as all matters within its authority were approved by the Board. | |||
Principal Responsibilities | ||
Subject to the supervision and oversight of the Board, our Executive Committee is responsible for, among other things: | ||
● | the approval of our acquisition, disposition and financing of investments | |
● | the authorization of the execution of certain contracts and agreements, including those relating to our borrowing of money | |
● | the exercise, in general, of all other powers of the Board, except for such powers that require action by all directors or the independent directors under our articles of incorporation or bylaws or under applicable law |
30 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Corporate Governance Highlights
Board Independence and Composition ● Majority independent Board and 100% independent Nominating and Corporate Governance, Audit and Compensation Committees ● Lead Independent Director role with robust responsibilities | Board and Board Committee Practices ● Board and committee self-evaluations ● Risk oversight by full Board and Audit Committee ● ESG oversight ● Robust stockholder engagement | Stockholder Rights ● Annual election of all directors ● Proxy access bylaw provision ● Majority voting standard for director elections |
Board Oversight of Strategy
One of the most important functions of the Board relates to its role in formulating and overseeing the execution of our business strategy. In order to do this the Board:
● | actively participates with management in the formulation and refinement of our business strategy to help ensure that our strategic goals are thoughtfully constructed and well-articulated; |
● | periodically meets with our management and external advisors in full day or multi-day sessions focused on long-term strategic planning; |
● | no less than quarterly, receives updates from management regarding internal progress toward strategic goals and changes in market conditions and external strategic opportunities and challenges in order to assist our management in refining its business strategy and reacting to particular opportunities or challenges that arise; |
● | monitors and evaluates performance through these regular updates and by actively engaging in dialogues with our senior management team; |
● | discusses aspects of our business strategy at every meeting, and includes key elements of our strategy in the work performed by the committees of the Board; and |
● | oversees financial and operational performance, non-financial measures, including sustainability, social and governance goals. |
The Board believes that, through these ongoing efforts, it is able to focus on our performance over the short, intermediate and long term to secure the continuing health and success of the business for our stockholders.
OVERSIGHT OF STRATEGIC RESPONSE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC |
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Board has devoted significant time to overseeing our strategic response to the pandemic, including working with management to assess the impact of the pandemic on all aspects of our business, and guiding the Company as we enhanced and deployed our pandemic response plan. |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 31 |
Risk Oversight
Board The Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk management process. Both directly and through its committees, the Board focuses on the Company’s general risk management strategy and the most significant risks facing the Company, and ensures that appropriate risk mitigation strategies are implemented by management. The Board is routinely apprised of particular risk management matters in connection with its general oversight and approval of corporate matters. In particular, the Board focuses on overseeing risks relating to the financial health of the Company, including the structure and amount of our debt, broad market conditions, leasing activity and expirations, status of development projects, environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, succession planning and other material risks facing the Company. | ||||
Audit Committee ● Oversees the Company’s risk management process ● Reviews with management (a) Company policies with respect to risk assessment and management of risks that may be material to the Company, (b) disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and (c) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements ● Reviews major legislative and regulatory developments that could have a material impact on the Company’s contingent liabilities and risks | Compensation Considers potential risks to the Company in its determinations of the overall structure of our executive compensation program, our ability to attract, retain and motivate our management team, the specific goals it establishes for our executives and the influence of incentive compensation on risk-taking | Nominating and Considers potential risks to the Company related to the composition of the board, including succession planning and diversity, environmental, social and governance matters, compliance with corporate governance guidelines and adoption of new policies and governance guidelines | ||
Management The Company’s management is responsible for day-to-day risk management, including the primary monitoring and testing function for company-wide policies and procedures, and management of the day-to-day oversight of the risk management strategy for the ongoing business of the Company. This oversight includes identifying, evaluating, and addressing potential risks that may exist at the enterprise, strategic, financial, operational, and compliance and reporting levels. | ||||
All committees report to the full Board as appropriate, including when a matter rises to the level of a material or enterprise level risk.
We believe the division of risk management responsibilities described above is an effective approach for addressing the risks facing the Company and that the Board leadership structure supports this approach.
32 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
OVERSIGHT OF CYBERSECURITY
Included in our Board’s oversight and approach to risk management is a focus on cybersecurity. As we transmit sensitive data across networks and rely on Internet-based systems to run our buildings, we are dedicated to protecting this information and the systems used to process it. We ensure our employees, processes, systems, and external partners are aligned with cybersecurity best practices.
Our actions include:
● | Regular assessment to ensure we are positioned to respond to security and privacy risks and to identify vulnerability gaps |
● | Conduct quarterly mandatory training for employees |
● | Continuous scan of our systems for vulnerabilities to ensure that any identified risks are immediately addressed |
● | Employ external agencies to test the efficacy of our security protocols |
● | Maintain cyber liability insurance coverage |
● | Leverage the cloud to employ sophisticated cybersecurity measures |
Stockholder Outreach
The Board and our Lead Independent Director believebelieves that engaging in stockholder outreach is an essential element of strong corporate governance. We strive for a collaborative approach to issues of importance to investors and continually seek to better understand the views of our investors on key topics affecting our business. In 2015topics.
Who We Engage Over the past several years, the chairs of the Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees and | Offered Engagement with Approximately | How We Engage We held meetings, conducted calls and otherwise engaged with investors on topics including our business strategy and executive compensation as well as governance and ESG matters. |
Our Track Record of our senior management team and our Lead Independent Director engaged with many of our largest institutional investors, representing ownership of more than 65% of our outstanding common stock. Responsiveness
We then shared the feedback received during our outreach process with the Board and its committees to make meaningful changes to our compensation and corporate governance practices and launch new initiatives, includinginitiatives. In addition to the followingchanges outlined in the table below, we have declassified our Board, adopted proxy access, implemented majority voting for uncontested director elections, and adopted an amendment to our bylaws to permit our stockholders to amend our bylaws by a majority vote.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 33 |
The table below summarizes the feedback received during the post-2021 annual meeting outreach and actions taken priorin response:
Feedback Theme | Specific Topics | Stockholder Feedback (“What We Heard”) | Action (“What We Did”) |
Executive Compensation | Overall Compensation Philosophy | Stockholders support our pre-pandemic compensation structure that focused on performance-based pay elements | The Compensation Committee has reaffirmed its commitment to our pre- pandemic compensation structure |
2021 Vote Discussion | Stockholders who voted against Say on Pay in 2021 consistently indicated they did so primarily because they disagreed with the specific decision to grant additional time-based equity | 2021 compensation is approximately 90% at-risk for all of our named executive officers, and performance-based incentives are in line with pre-pandemic percentages | |
Approach to Future Pandemic-Related Business Disruption | Stockholders who voted against Say on Pay in 2021 wanted to understand the Compensation Committee’s approach to incentive compensation, in light of the unpredictability of the COVID-19 virus | The Committee and Board agree that in a similarly highly disruptive event to the business, feedback from stockholder engagement and discussions with proxy advisors will inform the approach taken with respect to the treatment of incentive compensation | |
Design of compensation program | Stockholders confirmed strong support for actions taken since 2018 to simplify the pay elements and strengthen the alignment of pay and performance | Executives’ employment agreements renewed at the end of 2021 were substantially identical to the agreements redesigned in 2018, further confirming the Compensation Committee’s commitment to our pre-pandemic compensation structure | |
Corporate Governance | Board racial/ethnic diversity | Stockholders requested the addition of qualified directors who would enhance the racial/ethnic diversity on the Board | Appointed Carol N. Brown, a law professor with expertise in real estate law, to the SLG Board effective March 4, 2022 |
Board succession planning | Stockholders requested disclosure of Board succession planning | Terminating retainer for Chairman Emeritus effective December 31, 2023, with interim reductions commencing January 1, 2022; Planned retirement of Director John Levy at 2023 annual meeting of stockholders | |
Director-by-director skills matrix | Stockholders encouraged the inclusion of a director-by-director skills matrix instead of aggregate board skills matrix | Enhanced disclosure of board skills by including a director-by-director skills matrix in the 2022 proxy statement | |
ESG | ESG Disclosure | Stockholders commended our “spot on” disclosure as being “industry-leading” | Published 2021 ESG report in accordance with GRI, CDP, GRESB, SASB, TCFD frameworks, and UN SDG guidelines and first standalone TCFD Report |
Stockholder Amendments to Bylaws
Our bylaws provide our stockholders the right to amend our bylaws by the affirmative vote of a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. As amended, our bylaws do not place any limitations on stockholder proposals to amend our bylaws beyond the advance notice provisions that apply to all stockholder proposals. Accordingly, all of our stockholders now have the right to propose any amendments to our 2016 annual meeting:bylaws that are permitted by applicable law and, if any such amendment is approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, it will become effective.
| |
| |
|
Declassified Board
Our Board is fully declassified, and our directors are elected for one-year terms as of our 2020 annual meeting, following stockholder approval of our proposal to declassify our Board submitted to stockholders at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders.
Proxy Access
As a result of our stockholder engagement efforts and our commitment to corporate governance, in March 2016 weWe have adopted a proxy access bylaw provision, enabling our stockholders to include their own director nominees in our proxy materials along with candidates nominated by the Board, so long as theystockholder-nominees meet certain requirements, as set forth in our bylaws. For more information on our proxy access bylaw, see the section entitled “Other Information—Other Matters—Stockholder Proposals and Nominations.”
Majority Voting Standard and Director Resignation Policy
As a result of our stockholder engagement efforts and our commitment to corporate governance, in March 2016 the Board implementedWe have a majority voting standard for director elections. In an uncontested election (as is the case for this annual meeting), our bylaws provide that a majority of all the votes cast with respect to a nominee’s election is required for such nominee to be elected to serve on the Board. This means that the number of votes cast “for” a nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” such nominee, with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as a vote cast either “for” or “against���“against” a nominee. With respect to a contested election, a plurality of all of the votes cast is sufficient for the election of directors. For this purpose, a contested election is deemed to occur at any meeting of stockholders for which the Secretary determines that the number of nominees or proposed nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected at such meeting as of the seventh day preceding the date the Company files its definitive proxy statement for such meeting with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC (regardless of whether or not thereafter revised or supplemented).
If a nominee who currently is serving as a director receives a greater number of votes “against” his or her election than votes “for” such election in an uncontested election, Maryland law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” However,under our Governance Principles, any nominee for election as a director in an uncontested election who receives a greater number of votes “against” his or her election than votes “for” such election must, within ten business days following the certification of the stockholder vote, tender his or her written resignation to the Chairman of the Board for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the resignation and, within 60 days following the date of the stockholders’ meeting at which the election occurred, will make a recommendation to the Board concerning the acceptance or rejection of the resignation.
The Board will then take formal action on the recommendation no later than 90 days following the date of the stockholders’ meeting at which the election occurred. In considering the recommendation, the Board will consider the information, factors and alternatives considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and such additional factors, information and alternatives as the Board deems relevant. We will publicly disclose, in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC, the Board’s decision within four business days after the decision is made. The Board also will provide, if applicable, the Board’s reason or reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation.
2016 Proxy Statement 15
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 35 |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
SustainabilityEnvironmental Social & Governance (ESG)
The Board shares our commitment to environmentally sustainable initiatives and innovation that deliver efficiency, value and health for our business, tenants and community. Structured around the three key areas of efficiency, tenant experience and industry leadership, our sustainability program integrates market-leading initiatives to address energy usage, natural resource consumption, air quality, recycling, transportation and education.
Our commitment toward efficiencymission as the largest owner of commercial office space in New York City is evidenced by portfolio-wide investments. By implementing cutting edge technologiesto contribute to its brighter future – this includes reducing greenhouse gas emissions and modernizing obsolete building systems, we continuemitigating climate change risks. We believe continued advancement of the sustainability of our portfolio will serve to optimize building performance, reduce maintenance costs and provide tenants with a Class A experience. We have installed more than 35,000 LED bulbs, monitor energy consumption through a real-time energy platform and trackbuild long-term value that benefits all of our portfolio’s sustainability performance through a web based environmental management system. Currently, we are exploring the deployment of cogeneration, photovoltaic “solar” panels, fuel cells and steam reduction technologies to provide healthier and more reliable forms of energy throughout our portfolio.
Keystakeholders. Essential to our programprogress is active tenant engagement. We partnerthe ability to attract, develop and retain extraordinary talent by maintaining a healthy and inclusive workplace environment, where we provide our employees with tenant sustainability teamsthe tools and resources necessary to elevate the synergies and capabilities of our companiesthrive.
Delivering Value for the benefit of the community. This collaboration takes the form of LEED-CI certifications, Earth Day events, annual community service days, quarterly tenant educational webinars on sustainability topics, Urban Green Council award nominations and participation in the NYC Mayor’s Zero Waste Challenge.
All Our industry leadership has been widely recognized. During 2015 and 2016, we were recognized by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as an ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year for our efforts to strategically manage and improve energy efficiency across our Manhattan and suburban portfolios. In addition to releasing a compliant GRI report for the past 3 consecutive years, we have been recognized by Newsweek as one of the greenest companies in the United States. Additionally, we have been included in the MSCI Sustainability Index since 2015. Our sustainability strategy, achievements and reports are available on our website at http://www.slgreen.com/sustainability.
Risk Oversight
The Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk management process. The Board focuses on the Company’s general risk management strategy and the most significant risks facing the Company, and ensures that appropriate risk mitigation strategies are implemented by management. The Board also is apprised of particular risk management matters in connection with its general oversight and approval of corporate matters. In particular, the Board focuses on overseeing risks relating to the structure and amount of our debt, including overall aggregate principal balance, variable rate versus fixed rate debt, maturity schedules and balance of secured and unsecured debt.
The Board delegated to the Audit Committee oversight of the Company’s risk management process. Among its duties, the Audit Committee reviews with management (a) the Company policies with respect to risk assessment and management of risks that may be material to the Company, (b) the Company’s system of disclosure controls and system of internal controls over financial reporting and (c) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee also is responsible for reviewing major legislative and regulatory developments that could have a material impact on the Company’s contingent liabilities and risks. Our other Board committees also consider and address risk as they perform their respective committee responsibilities. All committees report to the full Board as appropriate, including when a matter rises to the level of a material or enterprise level risk.
In addition, our Compensation Committee considers the risks to the Company’s stockholders and to the achievement of our goals that may be inherent in the Company’s executive compensation program.
The Company’s management is responsible for day-to-day risk management, including the primary monitoring and testing function for company-wide policies and procedures, and management of the day-to-day oversight of the risk management strategy for the ongoing business of the Company. This oversight includes identifying, evaluating, and addressing potential risks that may exist at the enterprise, strategic, financial, operational, and compliance and reporting levels.
We believe the division of risk management responsibilities described above is an effective approach for addressing the risks facing the Company and that the Board leadership structure supports this approach.
16 SL Green Realty Corp.Stakeholders
Employees | Tenants | Community | Shareholders |
We are committed to workplace diversity and to fostering a corporate culture that enables our employees to meet their full potential, while actively contributing to our ESG evolution. | Our long-standing relationships and continued collaboration with our tenants are essential to long-term improvement of our portfolio’s ESG performance, while providing our tenants with unique offerings to track and foster sustainability. | SL Green’s success is linked to a thriving New York City. We support a variety of causes that address the physical, mental, and emotional needs of our community. We also create thousands of jobs and positive community impact. | Our ongoing ESG efforts help attract and retain diverse, high-performing talent, maximize our portfolio and give back to our NYC community, elements which are essential to delivering long-term stockholder value. |
ESG Oversight | |
● ESG program oversight by the full Board, reflective of the program’s cross-departmental integration and importance to the Company’s long-term strategic plan ● Executive level management of ESG program, with dedicated team responsible for implementation, including the Chief Operating Officer, SVP & Director of Sustainability and VP of Human Resources ● Annual ESG reporting in accordance with GRI, CDP, GRESB SASB and TCFD frameworks ● ESG disclosures aligned with UN SDG guidelines ● Third-party assurance of environmental performance data ● Environmental legislation risk mitigated by long-term capital investments in energy efficiency and tenant programs focused on sustainability | |
Environmental | |
Goals: ● Reduce the intensity of portfolio-wide greenhouse gas emissions by 30% by 2025 ● Achieve net zero carbon operations by 2050, in line with Urban Land Institute commitment ● Achieve 50% recycling rate by 2025, in line with LEED v4 threshold ● Reduce whole-building energy consumption by 20% by 2030 Achievements: ● Commit to Science-Based Targets at the highest level of ambition, the 1.5-degree scenario ● Green building certifications of 93% of Manhattan Operating Properties based on total square footage ● LEED certified 92% of Manhattan Operating Properties ● ENERGY STAR labels across 10.6 million square feet, representing 12% of all ENERGY STAR labels achieved in Manhattan by square footage ● WELL Health-Safety Rating across 23 million square feet, the only NYC owner to have enrolled ● First WELL Core Certified Platinum project in NYC, and one of the first such projects in the United States (One Vanderbilt) | |
36 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Human Capital Management | |
● Certified as a Great Place to Work ● Market-leading benefits program spanning healthcare, 401(k) match, employee stock purchase plan, disability and advanced fertility coverage, wellness and life insurance ● Investments in human capital development through training programs, tuition reimbursement and ongoing education ● Zero tolerance, anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies and training ● Ethnic minorities represent 54% and women represent 39% of all SL Green employees in 2021 ● Partnership with women’s leadership development organization, Luminary, to cultivate high potential female employees ● 19% of contractors onsite during the construction of One Vanderbilt were Minority and Women-owned Business Enterprises ● 90% of employees are proud to work for SL Green, according to a 2022 employee engagement survey | |
Corporate Philanthropy | |
● Corporate and employee contributions totaling $6 million across more than 70 partner organizations focused on providing New Yorkers with access to essential resources ● Co-founded FOOD 1st to address NYC food insecurity; delivered over 700,000 meals since April 2020 ● Employer-sponsored volunteer days, with civic opportunities chosen and coordinated by employee Community Outreach Ambassadors ● Participation in Governor’s Committee on Scholastic Achievement, a non-for-profit that connects high school students from underperforming New York communities with corporate mentors ● 7 Dey Street, the first ground-up development in lower Manhattan to be built under the Affordable New York Housing Program | |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCEFor additional information please see SL Green’s 2021 ESG Report.
Governance Principles
The Board adopted Governance Principles that address significant issues of corporate governance and set forth procedures by which the Board carries out its responsibilities. Among the areas addressed by the Governance Principles are director qualification standards, director responsibilities, director access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education, management succession, annual performance evaluation of the Board and management responsibilities. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, assessing and periodically reviewing the adequacy of the Governance Principles and will recommend, as appropriate, proposed changes to the Board. Although there is no one-size-fits all approach to corporate governance, we believe that our Governance Principles are aligned with the expectations of our stockholders, including the Investor Stewardship Group (ISG) and the ISG Corporate Governance Principles.
Code of Ethics
The Board adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our directors, executive officers and employees. The Code of Ethics is designed to assist our directors, executive officers and employees in complying with the lawlegal requirements and in resolving moral and ethical issues that may arise, and in complying with our policies and procedures. Among the areas addressed by the Code of Ethics are legal compliance, with applicable laws, conflicts of interest, use and protection of the Company’s assets, confidentiality, communications with the public, accounting matters, records retention, fair dealing, discrimination, harassment and health
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 37 |
and safety. We intend to disclose on our corporate website any amendment to, or waiver of, any provisions of this Code applicable to our directors and executive officers that would otherwise be required to be disclosed under the rules of the SEC or the NYSE.
Whistleblowing and Whistleblower Protection Policy
OurWe have adopted a Whistleblowing and Whistleblower Protection Policy pursuant to which our employees must report if they observe, suspect or become aware of a violation of applicable laws, regulations, or business ethics standards, and pursuant to which the Audit Committee established procedures for (1) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and (2) the confidential and anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. If you wish to contact our Audit Committee to report complaints or concerns relating to the financial reporting of the Company, you may do so in writing to the ChairmanChair of our Audit Committee, c/o Andrew S. Levine, Secretary, SL Green Realty Corp.,420 Lexington, One Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10170-1881.10017-3852. Any such communications may be made anonymously.
DirectorsAdditional Information
You are encouraged to visit the “Investors—Corporate Governance” section of our corporate website at www.slgreen.com to view or obtain copies of our committee charters, Code of Ethics, Governance Principles and director independence standards. The information found on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this proxy statement or any other report or document we file with, or furnish to, the SEC. You also may obtain, free of charge, a copy of the respective charters of our committees, Code of Ethics, Governance Principles and director independence standards by directing your request in writing to SL Green Realty Corp., One Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10017-3852, Attention: Investor Relations.
Lobbying, Political Contributions and Trade Associations
The Company whobelieves that participation in the public policy process is an important and essential means of enhancing stockholder value. Our efforts in this area are also employees receive no additional compensation for their services as directors. The following table sets forth information regardingdirectly overseen by our chief executive officer and periodically reviewed by the compensation paidfull Board and by our legal department on an ongoing basis to our non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) ($) | Stock Awards(2) ($) | Option Awards(3) ($) | Total ($) | |||||||
Edwin T. Burton, III | $ | 89,500 | $ | 300,000 | — | $ | 389,500 | ||||
John H. Alschuler | $ | 193,500 | $ | 300,000 | — | $ | 493,500 | ||||
John S. Levy | $ | 80,500 | $ | 300,000 | — | $ | 380,500 | ||||
Craig M. Hatkoff | $ | 66,000 | $ | 300,000 | — | $ | 366,000 | ||||
Betsy Atkins | $ | 52,000 | $ | 225,000 | — | $ | 277,000 |
2016 Proxy Statement 17ensure compliance with applicable laws.
38 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCEDIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Director Compensation Process
We review our director compensation annually, including engagement of FTI Consulting to evaluate the structure and competitiveness of our non-employee director compensation and recommend changes as appropriate. Based on these reviews, since 2019, we have reduced the value of the annual stock grant to directors by $65,000, from $300,000 to $235,000, and reduced the cash retainer paid for serving as our Lead Independent Director by $15,000, from $85,000 to $70,000.
Most recently, in December 2021, the Compensation Committee again conducted a full review of our director compensation in consultation with FTI Consulting. No changes were recommended.
Elements of Director Compensation
Only non-employee Directors are compensated for service on the Board. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2021, the fees for non-employee Directors were:
Annual cash retainers | ||||||
Cash retainer | $ | 50,000 | $ | 50,000 | ||
Additional cash retainer if serving as the Lead Independent Director | $ | 85,000 | $ | 70,000 | ||
Additional cash retainer if serving as a chair of the Audit Committee | $ | 10,000 | $ | 25,000 | ||
Additional cash retainer if serving as a chair of the Compensation Committee | $ | 7,500 | $ | 20,000 | ||
Additional cash retainer if serving as a chair of the Corporate Governance Committee | $ | 5,000 | $ | 5,000 | ||
Meeting fees | ||||||
For each meeting of the Board or a committee of the Board | $ | 1,500 | $ | 1,500 | ||
For each special meeting of the Audit Committee held independently of Board meetings | $ | 4,000 | $ | 4,000 | ||
Stock grant | ||||||
Valued at the grant date with shares fully vested on such grant date. | $ | 300,000 | $ | 235,000 |
The annual fees and meeting fees generally are payable quarterly in cash; provided that eachcash. Each director may elect to receive some or all of these fees in stock and, as noted below, may elect to defer some or all of these fees.
Under our Non-Employee Directors’ Deferral Program, our non-employee directors were entitled to elect to defer up to 100% of their annual fees, meeting fees and annual stock grant. At each director’s election, cash fees deferred under the program could be credited in the form of either phantom stock units, account credits that accrue earnings or losses based on the 30-day LIBOR rate at the beginning of each month plus 2% (or based on such other rate or the performance of such investments as may be determined in advance by the Board) or measurement fund credits that track the performance of one or more open-ended mutual funds selected by the director. Stock grants deferred under the program are credited in the form of phantom stock units. Subject to limitations contained in the program, on a fixed date each quarter, a director may convert phantom stock units into account credits or measurement fund credits or vice versa or change the mutual funds that some or all of the director’s measurement fund credits track. All cash fees credited as, and conversions of or into, phantom stock units or measurement fund credits are based on the fair market value of our common stock or the applicable mutual fund on the date the cash fees otherwise would have been paid or the date of the conversion, as applicable. Unless otherwise elected by a director, a director’s phantom stock units, account credits and measurement fund credits are payable on the earlier of the January 1st coincident with or next following the director’s termination of service from the Board, or a change in control of the Company, as defined by the program. Phantom stock units are payable in an equal number of shares of our common stock; provided that we may elect to instead settle a director’s phantom stock units by paying the director cash in an amount equal to the value of such shares of common stock. Account credits and measurement fund credits are payable in cash. Under the program, each director is entitled to receive dividend equivalents that are paid currently on the director’s phantom stock units, unless the director elected to defer payment of such dividend equivalents and have them concurrently reinvested into additional phantom stock units.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 39 |
2021 Director Compensation
Directors of the Company who are also employees receive no additional compensation for their services as directors. The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for their service during the fiscal year ending 2016, we retained the same director compensation arrangements that were in place for 2015.ended December 31, 2021.
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) ($) | Stock Awards(2) ($) | Option Awards(3) ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||
John H. Alschuler | $ | 129,000 | $ | 235,000 | — | — | $ | 364,000 | ||||||
Betsy S. Atkins | $ | 66,500 | $ | 235,000 | — | — | $ | 301,500 | ||||||
Edwin T. Burton, III | $ | 102,000 | $ | 235,000 | — | — | $ | 337,000 | ||||||
Lauren B. Dillard | $ | 125,500 | $ | 235,000 | — | — | $ | 360,500 | ||||||
Stephen L. Green | $ | 57,500 | $ | 235,000 | — | $ | 650,000(4) | $ | 942,500 | |||||
Craig M. Hatkoff | $ | 82,000 | $ | 235,000 | — | — | $ | 317,000 | ||||||
John S. Levy | $ | 62,000 | $ | 235,000 | — | — | $ | 297,000 |
(1) | Mr. Levy and Ms. Dillard deferred all of their 2021 cash compensation and Mr. Alschuler deferred $60,000 of his 2021 cash compensation pursuant to our Non-Employee Directors’ Deferral Program. Mr. Hatkoff elected to receive $25,000 of his 2021 cash compensation in the form of shares of our common stock. Accordingly, our non-employee directors received the following shares of our common stock or phantom stock units with respect to the portion of their 2021 cash compensation that they elected to defer or receive in stock, as applicable: Mr. Alschuler received 851 units, Ms. Dillard received 2,736 units, Mr. Levy received 3,982 units and Mr. Hatkoff received 355 shares. |
(2) | Amounts shown reflect the full grant date fair value on the date of grant of shares of our common stock or phantom stock units granted to the directors in 2021, excluding shares of our common stock and phantom stock units credited in lieu of annual fees and meeting fees. |
(3) | There were no stock options granted to members of the Board in 2021. At December 31, 2021, the aggregate number of option awards held by our non-employee directors was as follows: Mr. Alschuler—8,500; and Mr. Levy—8,500. |
(4) | Represents monthly retainer fees paid pursuant to the chairman emeritus agreement we entered into with Mr. Green in connection with his retirement as Chairman of the Company in January 2019, as amended by a letter agreement in March 2022. Under the letter agreement, Mr. Green will receive reduced monthly retainer fees for 2022 and 2023, and will cease to receive any retainer fee beginning January 1, 2024. Further information on the agreement can be found in the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Chairman Emeritus Agreement” on page 92. |
18 SL Green Realty Corp.
Since 2019, we have reduced the value of the annual stock grant to directors by $65,000 from $300,000 to $235,000 and reduced the cash retainer paid for serving as our Lead Independent Director by $15,000 from $85,000 to $70,000. |
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
40 |
The following sets forth biographical information regarding our executive officers who are not also directors.
Chief Financial Executive Officer Age: 47 | ● Mr. DiLiberto joined the Company in September 2004 and currently serves as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, overseeing the finance, accounting, tax, investor relations and corporate capital markets functions of the organization. ● Mr. DiLiberto previously served as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer & ● From June 2000 to September 2004, Mr. DiLiberto was with Roseland, New Jersey-based Chelsea Property Group, now a division of Simon Property Group, a REIT focused on the development and ownership of premium outlet centers, where he was a Controller and Director of Information Management. ● From August 1998 to June 2000, Mr. DiLiberto worked at New York-based Vornado Realty Trust, a diversified REIT with ownership interests in office, retail, and other property types, where he worked as a Senior Financial Analyst focusing on accounting and controls as well as the preparation of high level management reports and SEC filings. ● Prior to joining Vornado Realty Trust, Mr. DiLiberto worked as a Business Assurance Associate at Coopers and Lybrand, LLP (now PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP). ● Mr. DiLiberto currently serves ● Mr. DiLiberto received a B.S. degree in Accounting from The University of Scranton. | |||||
General Counsel Executive Officer Age: 63 | ● Mr. Levine has served as our Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel since April 2007 and as our General Counsel, Executive Vice President and Secretary since November 2000. ● Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Levine was a partner in the REIT and Real Estate Transactions and Business groups at the law firm of Pryor, Cashman, Sherman & Flynn, LLP. ● Prior to joining Pryor, Cashman, Sherman & Flynn, LLP, Mr. Levine was a partner at the law firm of Dreyer & Traub. ● Mr. Levine received a B.A. degree from the University of Vermont and a J.D. degree from Rutgers School of Law, where Mr. Levine was an Editor of the Law Review. ● He currently serves as a member of the Advisory Committee for Rutgers Center for Corporate Law and Governance. | |||||
2016 Proxy Statement 19
41
ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A(a)(1)14A of the Securities Exchange Act generally requires each public companyof 1934, as amended, and related SEC rules, we are asking our stockholders to include in its proxy statement a separate resolution subject to a non-binding stockholder vote to approve, on an advisory (nonbinding) basis, the compensation of the company’sour named executive officers, as disclosed in itsthis proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, not less frequently than once every three years.statement. This is commonly known as, and is referred to herein as, a “say-on-pay” proposal or resolution.
At our 20112017 annual stockholder meeting, our stockholders advised on a non-binding basis, by an affirmative vote of a majority of all votes cast, that the Company should hold non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation on an annual basis. On July 14, 2011,June 1, 2017, the Board determined that it will include future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers in the Company’s annual meeting proxy materials every year until the next advisory vote on the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation, which will occur no later than the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2017.2023.
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 14A(a)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Company is providing stockholders with the opportunity to approve the following non-binding, advisory resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”
The affirmative vote of a majority of all the votes cast with respect to this proposal will be required to approve this proposal.
The results of this advisory vote are not binding on the Compensation Committee, the Company or the Board. Nevertheless, we value input from our stockholders and will consider carefully the results of this vote when making future decisions concerning executive compensation.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of SL Green Realty Corp. has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, our Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this annual proxy statement and incorporated by referenceThe Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the above resolution regarding the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Submitted by our Compensation CommitteeJohn H. Alschuler (Chairman)Edwin Thomas Burton, IIIJohn S. Levy
Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the accompanying compensation tables in this Proxy Statement. |
42 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This section of our proxy statement discusses the principles underlying our executive compensation policies and decisions and the most important factors relevant to an analysis of these policies and decisions. It provides qualitative and quantitative information regarding the manner and context in which compensation is awarded to, and earned by, our named executive officers and places in perspective the data presented in the tables and narrative that follow.
Throughout this proxy statement, the individuals who served as our Chief Executive Officer, andPresident, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel during our 20152021 fiscal year as wellare referred to as the other individuals included in“named executive officers,” “our NEOs” or our “executives.”
Executive Summary
Named Executive Officers
Marc Holliday | Andrew Mathias | Matthew J. DiLiberto | Andrew S. Levine | ||||||
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | President | Chief Financial Officer | Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel | ||||||
Compensation Objectives and Philosophy
We adopted a pay-for-performance executive compensation philosophy that rewards the “Summary Compensation Table”achievement of annual and long-term goals of both the Company and individual executives, while achieving the following objectives:
20 SL Green Realty Corp.
ALIGNMENT | TALENT | MOTIVATION | BALANCE | EFFICIENCY | ||||||||
Provide performance-based incentives that create a strong alignment of management and stockholder interests | Attract and retain top talent in a market that is highly competitive for New York City commercial real estate management | Motivate our executives to achieve, and reward them for achieving, superior performance | Achieve an appropriate balance between risk and reward in our compensation programs that does not create incentives for unnecessary or excessive risk taking | Foster the dedication required to succeed against our competitors, while maintaining low overall general and administrative expense | ||||||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Executive Summary
Why You Should Vote for Our2016Say-On-Pay Proposal
Stockholder Engagement and Support
|
2021 Performance Highlights
ALL 2021 GOALS AND ACHIEVEMENTS
|
Strong Operational Performance
|
Superior Long-Term TRS Performance
|
Variable Pay Linked to Performance
|
Low G&A Expense
|
Executive Compensation Changes
|
Compensation Philosophy
As described below under “Our Executive Compensation Philosophy,” our executive compensation programs are designed to provide performance-based incentives that create strong alignment of management and stockholder interests and reward superior performance with superior compensation. We seek to attract and retain top talent in a highly competitive market, and we expect superior performance from our executives. Due to the efforts ofthe executives we attract, we achieve organizational efficiency (i.e., low relative G&A expense) as the efforts of our executives allow us to maintain a smaller organization overall, relative to the size and activities of the Company. We believe the results speak for themselves, as, even in a year where REITs underperformed other sectors of the market, our long-term TRS remains at the top of the class and our G&A expense as a percentage of total assets is the lowest among our office REIT peers.
2016Proxy Statement 21
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2015 Performance and Executive Compensation
The information below summarizes our strong long-term TRS, our2015achievements and our2015CEO compensation.
Sign 1.3M Square Feet of Manhattan Office Leases | Signed 1.9M Square Feet of Manhattan Office Leases | ||||
Manhattan Same Store |
| Achieved 93.0% Occupancy at Year End | |||
Superior Long-Term TRS Performance | ||||||||
Company/Index | One-Year TRS (1/1/15 - 12/31/15) | Five Year TRS (1/1/11 - 12/31/15) | Ten Year TRS (1/1/06 - 12/31/15) | Fifteen Year TRS (1/1/01 - 12/31/15) | ||||
Morgan Stanley | ||||||||
REIT Index (MSCI) | 2.52% | 75.32% | 103.17% | 379.03% | ||||
Russell2000 | -4.41% | 55.18% | 93.14% | 186.74% | ||||
S&P500Index | 1.38% | 80.75% | 102.42% | 107.99% | ||||
SNL US REIT | ||||||||
Office Index | 0.88% | 53.87% | 66.24% | 206.90% | ||||
SL Green | ||||||||
Realty Corp. | -2.97% | 81.29% | 83.87% | 534.85% |
|
$514M at Year End (since goal established) | |||||
| $158 Million of Strategic Acquisitions | ||||
$1.9 Billion of Strategic Dispositions | |||||
Debt and Preferred Equity Originations >$100M | $133 Million Originated | ||||
Debt and Preferred Equity Originations at >10% | Originated at 8% | ||||
One Vanderbilt: Obtain Permanent Financing | Obtained in June 2021 | ||||
One Vanderbilt: Secure Additional Joint Venture Partner | Deferred | ||||
One Vanderbilt: Achieve >85% Leased by Year End | 95.2% Leased at Year End | ||||
One Vanderbilt: Open Summit by October 2021 | Opened to Public on October 21, 2021 | ||||
One Madison: Secure Additional Joint Venture Partner | Additional Partner Secured | ||||
One Madison: Commence Core Foundation by October 2021 | Demolition Completed and Core Foundation Commenced | ||||
7 Dey Street: 30% Leased by December 2021 | 39% Leased at Year End | ||||
Same Store Cash NOI(1) Growth >(0.75%) | Achieved Growth of +0.70% | ||||
Unencumber >$350M of Assets | Unencumbered $386 Million of Assets | ||||
One-Year TSR Performance >10% | Achieved 27.2% One-Year TSR | ||||
Exceed SNL Office Index by 2.5% | Exceeded Index Constituents by 8.54% | ||||
100% of SLG Employees Work from Office in 2021 | 100% Worked from Office Five Days a Week | ||||
Support COVID-19 Vaccination Efforts | Established Testing and Vaccination Sites; 94% of Corporate Employees Vaccinated at Year End |
Low G&A Expense | ||||||
Lowest G&A/Total Assets Among Peers | ||||||
Percentage of Total Assets(2) | ||||||
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | ||||
Average | 0.84% | 0.81% | 0.80% | |||
Median | 0.73% | 0.74% | 0.82% | |||
SLG | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.48% | |||
SLG Rank: | 4thLowest | 4thLowest | Lowest | |||
Percentage of Total Revenues(2) | ||||||
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | ||||
Average | 7.13% | 7.03% | 6.42% | |||
Median | 7.25% | 6.60% | 6.26% | |||
SLG | 6.29% | 6.08% | 5.71% | |||
SLG Rank: | 6thLowest | 6thLowest | 4thLowest |
(1) | Refer to |
44 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Compensation Program Overview
At the heart of our executive compensation philosophy is a commitment to variable, incentive-based pay that aligns stockholder value with the economic interests of our management team. The percentages below reflect the total direct compensation awarded to our named executive officers for 2021, which we believe best reflects the actual compensation decisions made by the Committee.
Majority of 2021 Pay at Risk
Majority of 2021 Compensation Paid in Equity | ||||
CEO | Other NEOs | |||
Equity Compensation ● Performance-Based Equity Awards ● Time-Based Equity Awards | 72% | 64% | ||
Cash Compensation ● Base Salary ● Cash Bonus | 28% | 36% |
Consideration of Say-on-Pay Vote
Over the last few years, our Compensation Committee has embarked on a robust stockholder outreach program. That feedback has served as a key input to compensation design and structural upgrades implemented since 2018. The success of the engagement program is evidenced by the significant changes adopted as a direct result of the feedback received and the significant increase in stockholder support in 2019 and 2020.
The Committee was disappointed by the 2021 advisory vote on executive compensation (“Say on Pay”) but remains committed to understanding stockholder sentiment. In response, the Committee reached out to investors several months earlier than in prior years to ensure that any actionable feedback received could be better incorporated into Compensation Committee discussions and decisions for 2022 and beyond.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 45 |
Board Responsiveness
During the fall and winter of 2021, we contacted stockholders collectively representing 65% of outstanding shares, and had substantive conversations with stockholders representing 50% of outstanding shares. Directors participated in several stockholder discussions, as well as in the conversations with both proxy advisors. The majority of calls were led by the Chairs of Compensation or Nominating and Corporate Governance committees.
Offered Engagement with approximately | Direct one-on-one discussions with approximately | Directors participated in calls representing approximately | ||||||
65% of Outstanding Shares | 50% of Outstanding Shares | 36% of Outstanding Shares | ||||||
The table below summarizes the feedback received on executive compensation and the resulting decisions and taken in response:
Specific Topics | Stockholder Feedback (“What We Heard”) | Action (“What We Did”) | ||
Overall Compensation Philosophy | Stockholders support our pre-pandemic compensation structure that focused on performance-based pay elements | The Compensation Committee reaffirmed its commitment to our pre-pandemic compensation structure | ||
2021 Vote Discussion | Stockholders who voted against Say on Pay in 2021 consistently indicated they did so primarily because they disagreed with the isolated decision to grant additional time-based equity | 2021 compensation is approximately 90% at-risk for all of our named executive officers, and performance-based incentives are in line with pre-pandemic percentages | ||
Approach to Future Pandemic-Related Business Disruption | Stockholders who voted against Say on Pay in 2021 wanted to understand the Compensation Committee’s approach to incentive compensation, in light of the unpredictability of the COVID-19 virus | The Committee and Board agree that in a | ||
Design of Compensation Program | Stockholders confirmed strong support for actions taken since 2018 to simplify the pay elements and strengthen the alignment of pay and performance | Executives’ employment agreements renewed at the end of 2021 were substantially identical to the agreements redesigned in 2018, further confirming the Compensation Committee’s commitment to our pre-pandemic compensation structure |
Return to 2019 Pre-Pandemic Compensation Structure
The Committee considered the results of our 2021 advisory vote on 2020 executive compensation and the feedback received through our extensive stockholder engagement program in its decisions for 2021 compensation. Based on this outreach, as set forth below, the Committee recommitted to the compensation structure we had in place for 2019, which received strong support from stockholders at our 2020 annual meeting.
Evolution of Compensation Program (2019-2021)
2019 Program Highlights | 2020 Program Changes | 2021 Program Changes | ||||
● Simplified, transparent program ● Formulaic cash ● Annual equity awards emphasizing multi-year performance and vesting periods | ● One-time discretionary bonus and equity awards to our CEO and President in response to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic intended to deliver actual 2020 compensation at a reduced level compared to 2019 actual compensation | ● Eliminated discretionary bonus and equity awards to our CEO and President ● Reinstated target amounts for annual equity award grants and 100% formulaic calculations of annual cash bonus awards |
46 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
HISTORICAL STOCKHOLDER FEEDBACK AND OUR RESPONSES (2016-2019)
We have benefited from many years of stockholder engagement. In addition to the changes we made for 2021 to align our executive compensation program with our 2019 pre-pandemic compensation structure, the Committee previously implemented the following changes to our executive compensation programs based on discussions with stockholders prior to 2019:
Stockholder Feedback (“What We Heard”) | Action (“What We Did”) | ||
● Base salary and deferred compensation provide overlapping fixed pay elements | ● Eliminated deferred compensation ● Reduced CEO base salary in 2018 | ||
● Annual incentive should focus on metrics within executives’ control | ● Eliminated TSR as a metric, added G&A expense and increased weighting of dividend growth | ||
● Discretionary annual equity bonus process not clear | ● Eliminated discretionary annual equity bonuses; replaced with 100% formulaic bonus program for our CEO and President | ||
● Retesting features allows for multiple vesting opportunities | ● Eliminated retesting | ||
● Performance period for performance units should be longer than one year | ● All performance-based equity awards are subject to three-year TSR performance | ||
● Contracts guarantee equity grants on multi-year basis | ● Contracts entered into in 2018 and 2021 replaced contractual guarantees with target equity grants for our CEO, President and General Counsel | ||
● Compensation Program is complicated | ● Reduced elements of compensation from 7 to 4 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 47 |
Our 2021 Executive Compensation Program
Elements of Compensation
Since 2019, our executive compensation program has been updated in line with stockholder feedback to comprise only the following four pay elements:
Percentage (all NEOs) | Pay Element | Purpose and Key Characteristics | |
Annual Base Salary | Competitive annual base salaries encourage the retention and attraction of talented leadership Reflects the scope of each executive officer’s duties and responsibilities, taking into account the competitive market compensation paid by other companies for similar positions | ||
Annual Cash Bonus | Bonus awards incentivize our named executive officers to achieve annual financial and strategic goals Entirely formulaic and performance-based for both our CEO and President, providing an opportunity to earn up to 300% and 250%, respectively, of annual base salary Discretionary for our CFO and General Counsel Our executives may receive all or a portion of annual bonuses in the form of equity, further increasing alignment with stockholders | ||
Performance-Based Equity Awards | Annual performance-based equity awards provide short-term and long-term incentives to drive stockholder value Awards are 50% based on performance against annual operating Awards are 50% based on relative TSR over a three-year performance period | ||
Time-Based Equity Awards | Time-based equity awards ensure the alignment of the interests of our executives with those of long-term stockholders, with actual amounts granted based on an assessment of each executive’s performance during the most recent fiscal year and other factors Realized value of equity awards is based on the market value of our common stock |
This simplified, performance-focused structure is the result of a multi-year stockholder engagement effort. These elements of compensation are built into the employment agreements with our named executive officers, which were in effect during 2021, as well as the new employment agreements we entered into with our CEO, President and General Counsel in December 2021 that were effective beginning in January 2022.
Anchoring our compensation program to variable pay is the cornerstone of our pay-for-performance philosophy and allows the Committee to reward superior performance, while the substantial long-term equity incentive portions of our compensation programs serve to align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders.
48 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Summary of 2021 Compensation
The Committee makes compensation decisions intended to recognize our executives for their contributions to our financial and operating performance, ensure retention and motivation of key leaders in a highly competitive environment and align the economic interests of our management team with our stockholders. In each case, the Committee allocates the various elements of compensation described above based on our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy and by reference to the terms of the employment agreements we have entered into with each of our named executive officers.
TOTAL DIRECT COMPENSATION FOR 2021
We present the “total direct compensation” for each of our named executive officers, which reflects the actual amounts awarded by the Committee for a given year. We believe this presentation provides investors with the most accurate understanding of the compensation decisions made by the Committee.
2021 Direct Compensation | |||||||||||||||
Name | Base Salary | Cash Bonus(1) | Performance- Based Equity Awards(2) | Time-Based Equity Awards(2) | Total(3) | ||||||||||
Marc Holliday | $ | 1,250,000 | $ | 3,362,500 | $ | 7,500,000 | $ | 4,500,000 | $ | 16,669,630 | |||||
Andrew Mathias | $ | 950,000 | $ | 2,151,750 | $ | 6,000,000 | $ | 3,500,000 | $ | 12,652,272 | |||||
Matthew J. DiLiberto | $ | 575,000 | $ | 1,850,000 | $ | 555,556 | $ | 978,681 | $ | 3,970,837 | |||||
Andrew S. Levine | $ | 580,000 | $ | 1,175,000 | $ | 555,556 | $ | 1,300,000 | $ | 3,622,156 |
(1) | Determined formulaically for |
(2) | |
(3) | Includes the following compensation categorized as “Other Compensation” as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table: Mr. Holliday—$57,130; Mr. Mathias—$50,522; Mr. DiLiberto—$11,600; and Mr. Levine—$11,600, respectively. |
The methodology used to make compensation decisions and the amounts of compensation awarded for 2021 were generally consistent with the methodology and amounts used for 2019, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. |
Using our CEO’s 2021 compensation, the table below illustrates the differences between total direct compensation and the Summary Compensation Table that appears later in this proxy statement.
2021 CEO Direct Compensation vs. Summary Compensation Table | ||||||
Element of Compensation | Total Direct Compensation | Summary Compensation Table | ||||
Base Salary | $ | 1,250,000 | $ | 1,250,000 | ||
Annual Cash Bonus(1) | $ | 3,362,500 | $ | 2,999,265 | ||
Annual Performance-Based Award(2) | $ | 7,500,000 | $ | 9,026,551 | ||
Annual Time-Based Award(3) | $ | 4,500,000 | $ | 7,755,111 | ||
Other Compensation | $ | 57,130 | $ | 57,130 | ||
Total | $ | 16,669,630 | $ | 21,088,057 |
(1) | The “Total Direct Compensation” column represents the full value of the amount earned formulaically based on objective bonus criteria. Because Mr. Holliday’s 2021 annual cash bonus was paid 50% in cash and 50% in equity, the “Summary Compensation Table” column reflects the actual value of the cash portion of the bonus and, for the remaining 50% granted in equity, the grant date value of LTIP units granted in December 2021. |
(2) | The “Total Direct Compensation” column reflects the target notional value awarded consistent with Mr. Holliday’s employment agreement. The “Summary Compensation Table” column reflects the grant date value of the award. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 49 |
(3) | The “Total Direct Compensation” column reflects the value of the time-based award granted in January 2022 based on the Company’s 2021 performance consistent with Mr. Holliday’s employment agreement. The “Summary Compensation Table” column reflects the value of awards granted in 2021 for 2020 performance. |
The Total Direct Compensation approved by the Committee for Mr. Holliday for 2021 was approximately 21% lower than the total |
ANNUAL BASE SALARY
Following a review of his current responsibilities and competitive market data, we increased Mr. DiLiberto’s base salary for 2021 from $550,000 to $575,000, a 4.5% increase, in connection with entering into his new employment agreement. The increase better aligns Mr. DiLiberto’s base salary with his role at the company and our compensation peers. We otherwise made no changes to the base salaries of our named executive officers for 2021 and the amounts reflect the minimum amounts set forth in each executive’s employment agreement.
With the exception of Mr. DiLiberto’s 2021 base salary, we have not increased any of our NEO’s base salaries since 2019. In 2018, we reduced our CEO’s base salary by $100,000 to its current level. |
ANNUAL CASH BONUS ELIGIBILITY
Formulaic Annual Cash Bonus – CEO and President. Our annual cash bonus program for our CEO and President is 100% formulaic and the percentages of base salary that can be earned under the program are set forth in each executive’s employment agreement. For 2021, each of our CEO and President were eligible to earn the following percentages of their respective base salary (with linear interpolation used to determine the percentage earned for performance that falls between threshold, target and/or maximum):
Executive | Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||
Marc Holliday | 50% | 200% | 300% | |||
Andrew Mathias | 50% | 175% | 250% |
Based on our performance relative to the objective bonus criteria established in January 2021, Mr. Holliday earned 269% of his 2021 base salary and |
The specific performance criteria for our formulaic annual cash bonus program are determined in January of each year by the Committee and are set forth below under “2021 Performance Summary.”
Discretionary Annual Cash Bonus – CFO and General Counsel. Our employment agreements with our CFO and General Counsel do not provide for formulaic percentages of base salary that can be earned. For 2021, our CFO and General Counsel instead received discretionary bonuses based on the same performance criteria as were used for our formulaic annual cash bonus program, as well as specific company goals and objectives for 2021 that were presented at our annual investor conference in December 2020.
These additional objectives, listed above, included financial goals, achievement of leasing and occupancy targets, investing activities such as strategic acquisitions and dispositions and share repurchases, execution of our debt and preferred equity platform, asset and corporate level leverage, joint venture and development milestones and furtherance of our other corporate goals and initiatives, many of which are key drivers of stockholder value.
In addition to the financial and operational achievements that exceeded our formulaic targets, we also achieved almost all of the other business goals we set out to achieve for 2021, including hitting key milestones relating to our One Vanderbilt and One Madison projects, unencumbering $386M of assets, executing over $500M of share repurchases and completing approximately $2B of strategic dispositions (nearly doubling our target). |
50 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
ANNUAL EQUITY AWARDS
We grant our named executive officers performance-based LTIP units and time-based LTIP units annually in connection with their employment agreements and, in some cases, at the discretion of the Committee. For 2021, our annual long-term incentive equity award program consisted solely of grants of performance-based equity awards with multi-year performance criteria and time-based equity awards that vest based on continued service.
Target Amounts – CEO, President and General Counsel. The target amounts of performance-based equity awards and time-based equity awards for Messrs. Holliday, Mathias and Levine are set forth below:
Target Equity Award Amounts | |||||||||
Executive | Performance-Based | Time-Based | Total | ||||||
Marc Holliday | $ | 7,500,000 | $ | 4,500,000 | $ | 12,000,000 | |||
Andrew Mathias | $ | 6,000,000 | $ | 3,500,000 | $ | 9,500,000 | |||
Andrew S. Levine | — | $ | 1,300,000 | $ | 1,300,000 |
Earned performance-based LTIP units granted based on the target amounts set forth above will vest 100% for Messrs. Holliday and Mathias on December 31, 2023. The time-based LTIP Units granted to Messrs. Holliday, Mathias and Levine pursuant to each executive’s employment agreement are subject to vesting over three years, with each award vesting ratably on January 1st of each year following the grant date.
For 2021, we granted equity awards in line with the target amounts set forth above. We grant performance-based awards prospectively for each compensation year when we establish performance goals to incentivize our executives to deliver accretive value to stockholders. We grant time-based awards retrospectively based on each executive’s contributions to our achievements during the prior year. |
Discretionary Awards – CFO and General Counsel. Our employment agreements with Messrs. DiLiberto and Levine do not provide for target annual performance-based equity grants, but both participate, at the Committee’s discretion, in our annual long-term performance-based equity program. Earned performance-based LTIP units granted for 2021 will vest 50% on each of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024, for Messrs. DiLiberto and Levine.
Mr. DiLiberto also received a time-based long-term equity award of 31,020 LTIP units in connection with the signing of his employment agreement in February 2021, of which 50% vested on January 1, 2022 and the remaining 50% will vest on January 1, 2023.
For detailed 2021 pay outcomes for each of our named executive officers, see the NEO scorecards below.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 51 |
How We Select Performance Criteria – Formulaic Cash Bonus and Equity Awards
Emphasis on At-Risk Pay Elements | In line with stockholder feedback, we have reaffirmed our commitment to performance-based incentives. For 2021: 92.5% of CEO compensation was performance-based and at-risk 89.6% of other NEO compensation was performance-based and at-risk This design allows the Committee to reward superior performance, while the substantial long-term equity incentive portions of our compensation programs serve to align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders. | |
Performance Metrics Reflect Complexities of Our Business | The Committee has carefully selected performance criteria across not just a range of financial and corporate goals but also a range of performance periods. In aggregate, these criteria aim to account for the complexities of operating our business over both the short-term and the long-term. | |
No One-Size-Fits-All Solution | While establishing performance goals, the Committee has designed incentives that incentivize our executive officers to strive for excellence no matter the time horizon. This is accomplished by rationally linking the sum of the component parts of our compensation structure not just to the way our executive officers think about our business but also to the way that our stockholders think about value. | |
Annual Cash Bonus | Annual Equity Awards (Operational Component) | Annual Equity Award (Relative Component) | ||||
Period | One year | One year with three-year modifier | Three years | |||
Objectives | ● Normalized FFO per share ● Annual same-store cash NOI growth ● Dividend growth ● G&A expense | ● Funds available for distribution ● Debt/EBITDA ratio ● Manhattan office same store leased occupancy ● Manhattan office leasing volume ● Absolute TSR (three-year modifier) | ● TSR Relative to the constituents of an office REIT index ● TSR Relative to a group of NYC peers |
2021 Performance Summary
The performance goals established at the beginning of each year by the Committee motivate financial and operational outperformance in line with Company guidance and internal projections. The criteria used for annual cash bonuses and performance-based equity remained the same across 2019, 2020 and 2021 because they were, and continue to be, key drivers to stockholder value creation. Threshold, target and maximum levels were set on the basis of a rigorous and consistent pay-for-performance compensation philosophy.
RIGOROUS METHODOLOGY FOR SETTING PERFORMANCE GOALS
The methodology used to establish goals is fundamentally tied to the then current economic and business conditions. Over the last three years we have witnessed widespread, uncontrollable disruption to business due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as changes to the office environment generally. We have responded with intentional, transformative changes to our business, all of which are designed to streamline our operations and allow us to excel in the evolving environment in which we operate. This thesis was validated in 2021 by our exceptional one-year TSR of 27.2% compared to our office REIT and NYC peer groups.
As an example of the process, the following table relates the components of our annual formulaic cash bonus program for each of 2019, 2020 and 2021 to our guidance for the relevant year across threshold, target and maximum pay opportunities. The same methodology was applied to the establishment of operational goals under our annual performance-based equity awards for each year.
52 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Annual Targets Relative to Guidance
Annual Formulaic Cash Bonus Targets Relative to Guidance (2019-2021) | ||||||||||||||||||
Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||||||||
Formulaic Cash Bonus Goal(1) | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |||||||||
FFO Per Share | $(0.15) | $(0.20) | $(0.30) | $(0.05) | $(0.05) | $(0.10) | +$0.05 | +$0.05 | +$0.10 | |||||||||
Same Store Cash NOI Growth | (50) bps | (110) bps | (225) bps | +30 bps | 0 bps | (75) bps | +100 bps | +80 bps | +75 bps | |||||||||
G&A Expense | +$2.5M | +$5.0M | +$4.0M | +$1.0M | +$2.0M | +$2.0M | $(0.5M) | $0.0M | $0.0M |
(1) | Each performance level is presented as the variance from our guidance, with FFO Per Share based on the midpoint of such guidance and Same Store Cash NOI Growth based on the target percentage presented at our annual investor conference for the applicable year. |
The consistency with which the Committee has gone about establishing performance goals is strong evidence of our focus on building a culture of alignment and accountability for our management team. This is achieved year after year in the context of a rigorous process that connects internal budgeting, external guidance and compensation opportunities. The Committee does not look to comparisons of forward-looking performance goals versus prior year goals or results as part of this process, particularly during a unique period in our business like the past three years that would render comparisons between periods irrelevant. For example, the 2021 goals established by the Committee reflect a full-year impact from the COVID-19 pandemic compared to a 9-month impact reflected in our 2020 results and no impact when the 2020 goals were established prior to the onset of the pandemic. Therefore, year-over-year comparisons are neither a meaningful way to evaluate the rigor of our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy nor the way the Committee seeks to drive value creation for stockholders. It is also important to note that throughout our stockholder engagement, none of our stockholders expressed a desire for or focus on year-over-year comparisons of our performance metrics.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic presented a unique challenge for the Company and the Committee due to an uncertain business environment. We therefore expanded our guidance range in the face of unprecedented volatility, with corresponding adjustments to threshold, target and maximum hurdles. Nevertheless, as is always the case, the 2021 goals were difficult to achieve and required the Company to deliver strong financial and operating performance and accretive value to stockholders to achieve payouts above target levels. As illustrated by the table above, performance under our formulaic cash bonus program and annual performance-based equity awards must always equal or exceed our guidance to achieve maximum performance levels. |
The Committee is proud of our track record in administering a rigorous pay-for-performance compensation philosophy in a consistent manner. We feel that the elements of our compensation program and the Committee’s compensation decisions have appropriately motivated our executives and recognized their contributions to our financial and operating performance broadly. Long term achievements like the significant creation of stockholder value from the One Vanderbilt and One Madison development projects, while not directly factored into compensation decisions, are evidence of how the foresight of our executive team and our performance goal setting have combined to build full alignment of economic interests between management and stockholders. Accomplishments like One Vanderbilt and One Madison along with the many goals achieved just in 2021, including, but not limited to, unencumbering $386M of assets, executing over $500M of share repurchases and completing approximately $2B of strategic dispositions, validate the strength of that alignment.
For all of our formulaic annual cash bonus awards and performance-based equity awards, linear interpolation is used to determine the percentage earned for performance that falls between threshold, target and/or maximum. The tables below set forth our 2021 performance relative to 2021 performance criteria.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 53 |
2021 Formulaic Annual Cash Bonus Goals
Performance Criteria / Reason Selected | Weighting | Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||
Normalized FFO per Share ● Widely-used non-GAAP measure of earnings performance for REITs, used both by investors and our management, and a key financial measure for which we provide guidance | 30% | |||||
Annual Same Store Cash NOI Growth(2) ● A key metric used to evaluate the operating performance of our properties. Same-store cash NOI is used to evaluate the operating performance of the properties owned by us in a similar manner in both reporting periods (year over year) | 30% | |||||
Dividend Growth ● Represents a key measure of the income we return to stockholders each year | 30% | |||||
G&A Expense ● Represents corporate overhead and is a key efficiency metric impacting the overall profitability and value of the Company | 10% |
(1) | Payouts and determinations under the annual cash bonus program were made in December 2021 based on a |
(2) | Excluding lease termination income. |
Based on our performance relative to these formulaic goals, our CEO and President earned the following amounts of annual cash bonus:
Executive | Target 2021 Cash Bonus ($) | Actual 2021 Cash Bonus (% of Target) | Actual 2021 Cash Bonus ($) | |||
Marc Holliday | $ 2,500,000 | 134.50% | $3,362,500 | |||
Andrew Mathias | $ 1,662,500 | 129.43% | $2,151,750 |
54 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
2021 Operational Component Performance Goals (50% of Annual Equity Award)
The operational component of our annual performance-based equity awards measures our performance against four objective criteria over a one-year performance period, which remain subject to an absolute TSR modifier (either up or down 12.5%) based on our absolute TSR performance over a three-year performance period. As of December 31, 2021, our one-year absolute TSR performance would have resulted in the maximum upward modifier of the initially earned operational awards.
Performance Criteria / Reason Selected | Weighting | Threshold (50%) | Target (100%) | Maximum (200%) | ||
Funds Available for Distribution ● A key measurement representing our ability to fund our dividends that is driven by the effective management of our portfolio and our business | 25% | |||||
Debt/EBITDA Ratio ● A widely used non-GAAP measure that reflects our ability to incur and service debt and is an indicator of the health of our balance sheet and cash flows | 25% | |||||
Manhattan Office Same Store Leased Occupancy ● Indicative of how effectively we manage properties owned by us in a similar manner in both reporting periods (year over year) | 25% | |||||
Manhattan Office Leasing Volume ● Represents our ability to execute our leasing platform in the highly competitive New York City real estate market | 25% | |||||
Absolute TSR per Year ● Absolute TSR is a pure measurement of value delivered to stockholders who were invested in our stock for the three-year performance period | +/- 12.5% |
2021 Relative Component Performance Goals (50% of Annual Equity Award)
The relative component of our annual performance-based equity awards measures our performance against two peer sets over a three-year performance period. For 2021, the Committee rebalanced the relative component to provide an equal weighting to our performance relative to Office REIT Peers and NYC REIT Peers, as opposed to 2020 when this component was weighted two-thirds to our Office REIT Peers and one-third to our NYC REIT Peers. The Committee implemented this change as part of its annual review of the effectiveness of our compensation program and it is intended to more closely tie the earning of this portion of the performance-based award to companies that are most directly comparable to us. As of December 31, 2021, based on our one-year TSR relative to the Office REIT Peers and the NYC REIT Peers, our performance would have placed us in the 78th percentile and 58th percentile respectively.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 55 |
Performance Criteria / Reason Selected | Weighting | Threshold (50%) | Target (100%) | Maximum (200%) | ||
Relative TSR vs. Office REIT Peers(1) ● Provides a comparison of the returns of a hypothetical investor seeking exposure to office REITs as an asset class and reflects how we performed versus other companies in | 50% | |||||
Relative TSR vs. NYC REIT Peers(2) ● Provides a comparison of our performance against companies with office and/or retail commercial real estate portfolios concentrated in the New York City market, which we believe are most directly comparable to the Company | 50% |
(1) | The Office REIT Peer Group is comprised of the constituents of the SNL US Office REIT Index on the grant date for the applicable award. Despite the discontinuation of the SNL US Office REIT Index in August 2021, we continue to measure performance against these constituent companies during the performance period. |
(2) | The NYC Peer Group is comprised of the following companies: Acadia Realty Trust, |
22FINAL RESULTS – 2019-2021 PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS
SL Green Realty Corp.The performance period for the 2019 annual performance-based equity awards concluded on December 31, 2021. Under the program, 150.10% of the target operational component was initially earned, which amount was reduced by 12.5% following application of the absolute TSR modifier at the end of the performance period. We also earned 57.98% of the target relative component for these awards. Although we substantially outperformed on the operational aspects of the award that were most under the control of our management team, because our TSR performance was disappointing the aggregate payout for the award was reduced to 94.66%, below target levels.
The table below summarizes the final value of these awards as of the conclusion of the performance period:
Executive | Target Value of Grant | Number of Units Earned at Target | Earned Units as of December 31, 2021 | Realized Value as of December 31, 2021(1) | ||||||||
Marc Holliday | $ | 7,500,000 | 92,174 | 87,253 | $ | 6,447,124 | ||||||
Andrew Mathias | $ | 6,000,000 | 73,740 | 69,801 | $ | 5,157,596 | ||||||
Matthew J. DiLiberto | $ | 1,250,000 | 6,828 | 6,463 | $ | 477,551 | ||||||
Andrew S. Levine | $ | 1,250,000 | 6,828 | 6,463 | $ | 477,551 |
(1) | Based on a per share price of $73.89, which was the closing stock price on the NYSE of one share of our common stock on December 31, 2021. |
The final payout for our 2019 annual performance-based equity award highlights the rigor of the program, our pay-for-performance philosophy and the alignment between our executives and our stockholders. |
2021 NEO Scorecards
The following scorecards summarize each element of compensation received by our NEOs for 2021. For purposes of framing the compensation decisions and pay outcomes, we present the “total direct compensation,” or TDC, amounts awarded for 2021 and contrast such amounts to SEC-mandated disclosure rules for the Summary Compensation Table, or SCT, for 2021. We believe this presentation provides investors with a clearer understanding of the compensation decisions made by the Committee.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Stockholder Engagement; Executive Compensation Changes
Over the last several years, we engaged in a formal stockholder outreach program focused on our executive compensation. Throughout each year, we are in contact with our large institutional stockholders, representing the owners of more than a majority of our outstanding common stock, to discuss our executive compensation programs, our business and our overall performance. These discussions are led by the chairman of our Compensation Committee, or the Committee, and Lead Independent Director or, in certain instances, members of senior management. We provide these stockholders with additional information regarding our executive compensation programs, our performance and the manner in which we believe our executive compensation programs contributed to our superior long-term performance. We also engage in discussions with these stockholders where we are able to clarify aspects of our executive compensation programs that they may not fully understand and receive direct feedback regarding specific aspects of our executive compensation programs.
Since our2015annual meeting, we contacted institutional stockholders owning more than 65% of our outstanding common stock. Below are some common themes we discussed during our this stockholder outreach and our responses:
56 |
| |||
| |||
| |||
Mr. Holliday’s 2021 compensation reflects the Company’s 2021 operational and financial performance, The Total Direct Compensation approved by the Committee for Mr. Holliday for 2021 is approximately 21% lower than the total compensation amount set forth in the
| |||
2021 Performance and Compensation –
Total Direct Compensation vs. Summary Compensation Table
TDC | SCT | Element of Compensation | |||
8% $1,250,000 | 6% $1,250,000 | Annual Base Salary Mr. Holliday’s base salary was equal to the minimum set forth in his employment agreement. There was no change to base salary for 2021 compared to 2020. | |||
20% $3,362,500 | 14% $2,999,265 | Formulaic Annual Cash Incentive Bonus The SCT amount reflects the cash portion of the bonus ($1,681,250) plus the grant date value of the portion of the bonus ($1,318,015) paid in equity at Mr. Holliday’s election. Bonus paid 50% in the form of 23,002 LTIP units that were fully vested upon grant, but remain subject to a three-year no-sell restriction. | |||
45% $7,500,000 | 43% $9,026,551 | Performance-Based Equity Awards The Committee granted performance-based awards in February 2021 having a target notional value of $7,500,000, consistent with the target amount set forth in Mr. Holliday’s employment agreement. The SCT amount reflects the grant date value of the awards. The award relates to the following number of LTIP units: | |||
2021 Performance-Based Award – Number of LTIP Units Granted | |||||
Threshold | Target | Maximum | Estimated Earned as of 12/31/2021 | ||
59,193 | 126,277 | 284,124 | 263,231 | ||
Earned LTIP units will be determined after the end of the full performance period ending December 31, 2023, based on our absolute and relative TSR, with earned LTIP units vesting in full as of December 31, 2023. | |||||
27% $4,500,000 | 37% $7,755,111 | Time-Based Equity Awards The Committee granted time-based awards in January 2022 based on the company’s 2021 performance. The awards had a target value of $4,500,000, equal to the target amount set forth in Mr. Holliday’s employment agreement. | |||
The SCT amount reflects the value of one-time, discretionary awards granted in January 2021 for 2020 performance, and does not reflect compensation decisions made by the Committee for 2021. | |||||
The time-based award was granted in the form of 61,246 LTIP units, which will vest in three equal installments on January 1, 2023, January 1, 2024 and January 1, 2025. | |||||
100% $16,669,630 | 100% $21,088,057 | Both totals include $57,130 of “Other Compensation,” as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 57 |
President Mr. Mathias’s 2021 compensation reflects his leadership and contributions to the The Total Direct Compensation approved by the Committee for Mr. Mathias for 2021 is approximately 21% lower than the total compensation amount set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. | ||
2021 Performance and Compensation –
Total Direct Compensation vs. Summary Compensation Table
TDC | SCT | Element of Compensation | |||
8% $950,000 | 6% $950,000 | Annual Base Salary Mr. Mathias’s base salary was equal to the minimum set forth in his employment agreement. There was no change to base salary for 2021 compared to 2020. | |||
17% $2,151,750 | 11% $1,686,855 | Formulaic Annual Cash Incentive Bonus The SCT amount reflects the grant date value of the bonus, which was granted in equity at Mr. Mathias’s election. Bonus paid 100% in the form of 29,439 LTIP units that were fully vested upon grant, but remain subject to a three-year no-sell restriction. | |||
47% $6,000,000 | 45% $7,221,245 | Performance-Based Equity Awards The Committee granted performance-based awards in February 2021 having a target notional value of $6,000,000, consistent with the target amount set forth in Mr. Mathias’s employment agreement. The SCT amount reflects the grant date value of the awards. The award relates to the following number of LTIP units: | |||
2021 Performance-Based Award – Number of LTIP Units Granted | |||||
Threshold | Target | Maximum | Estimated Earned as of 12/31/2021 | ||
47,355 | 101,023 | 227,300 | 227,300 | ||
Earned LTIP units will be determined after the end of the full performance period ending December 31, 2023, based on our absolute and relative TSR, with earned LTIP units vesting in full as of December 31, 2023. | |||||
28% $3,500,000 | 38% $6,020,926 | Time-Based Equity Awards The Committee granted time-based awards in January 2022 based on the company’s 2021 performance. The awards had a target value of $3,500,000, equal to the target amount set forth in Mr. Mathias’s employment agreement. | |||
The SCT amount reflects the value of one-time, discretionary awards granted in January 2021 for 2020 performance, and does not reflect compensation decisions made by the Committee for 2021. | |||||
The time-based award was granted in the form of 47,636 LTIP units, which will vest in three equal installments on January 1, 2023, January 1, 2024 and January 1, 2025. | |||||
100% $12,652,272 | 100% $15,929,548 | Both totals include $50,522 of “Other Compensation,” as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. |
58 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
MATTHEW J. DILIBERTO Chief Financial Officer Mr. DiLiberto’s 2021 compensation recognizes the Company’s significant operational and financial success, including his substantial contributions to The Total Direct Compensation approved by the Committee for | ||
2021 Performance and Compensation –
Total Direct Compensation vs. Summary Compensation Table
TDC | SCT | Element of Compensation | |||
14% $575,000 | 15% $575,000 | Annual Base Salary Mr. DiLiberto’s base salary increased 4.5%, from $550,000 to $575,000 compared to 2020 in connection with entering into his new employment agreement in February 2021. The increase was based on a review of competitive market data and his current role and responsibilities at the Company. | |||
47% $1,850,000 | 24% $925,000 | Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Bonus paid 50% in the form of 12,710 LTIP units granted in January 2022 that were fully vested upon grant, but remain subject to a three-year no-sell restriction. Because these LTIP units were granted in 2022, the value of the awards will be reported in next year’s Summary Compensation Table. The SCT amount reflects only the portion of Mr. DiLiberto’s 2021 bonus paid in cash. | |||
14% $555,556 | 19% $708,003 | Performance-Based Equity Awards The Committee granted performance-based awards in February 2021 having a target notional value of $555,556. The SCT amount reflects the grant date value of the awards. The award relates to the following number of LTIP units: | |||
2021 Performance-Based Award – Number of LTIP Units Granted | |||||
Threshold | Target | Maximum | Estimated Earned as of 12/31/2021 | ||
4,386 | 9,355 | 21,047 | 19,501 | ||
Earned LTIP units will be determined after the end of the full performance period ending December 31, 2023, based on our absolute and relative TSR, with earned LTIP units vesting 50% as of December 31, 2023 and 50% as of December 31, 2024. | |||||
25% $978,681 | 42% $1,610,869 | Time-Based Equity Awards The Committee granted time-based awards in February 2021 upon the extension of Mr. DiLiberto’s employment agreement. | |||
These awards were granted in lieu of participation in our annual time-based equity award program and so the Committee viewed 50% of the award as having been granted for 2021 and 50% as granted for 2022. The SCT amount reflects the full value of the award. | |||||
The time-based award was granted in the form of 31,020 LTIP units, which vested 50% on January 1, 2022 and 50% of which will vest on January 1, 2023. | |||||
100% $3,970,837 | 100% $3,830,472 | Both totals include $11,600 of “Other Compensation,” as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 59 |
ANDREW S. LEVINE Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel Mr. Levine’s 2021 compensation reflects the role he played in a wide range of the Company’s business and corporate initiatives, all of which contributed to our The Total Direct Compensation approved by the Committee for Mr. Levine for 2021 is approximately 7% higher than the total
| ||
2021 Performance and Compensation –
Total Direct Compensation vs. Summary Compensation Table
TDC | SCT | Element of Compensation | |||
16% $580,000 | 17% $580,000 | Annual Base Salary Mr. Levine’s base salary was equal to the minimum set forth in his employment agreement. There was no change to base salary for 2021 compared to 2020. | |||
33% $1,175,000 | 26% $874,232 | Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Bonus paid 100% in the form of 16,145 LTIP units granted in January 2022 that were fully vested upon grant, but remain subject to a three-year no-sell restriction. Because these LTIP units were granted in 2022, the value of the awards will be reported in next year’s Summary Compensation Table. The SCT amount reflects the grant date value of LTIP units awarded in January 2021 for 2020 annual cash incentive bonus. | |||
15% $555,556 | 21% $708,003 | Performance-Based Equity Awards The Committee granted performance-based awards in February 2021 having a target notional value of $555,556. The SCT amount reflects the grant date value of the awards. The award relates to the following number of LTIP units: | |||
2021 Performance-Based Award – Number of LTIP Units Granted | |||||
Threshold | Target | Maximum | Estimated Earned as of 12/31/2021 | ||
4,386 | 9,355 | 21,047 | 19,501 | ||
Earned LTIP units will be determined after the end of the full performance period ending December 31, 2023, based on our absolute and relative TSR, with earned LTIP units vesting 50% as of December 31, 2023 and 50% as of December 31, 2024. | |||||
36% $1,300,000 | 36% $1,201,465 | Time-Based Equity Awards The Committee granted time-based awards in January 2022 based on the company’s 2021 performance. The awards had a target value of $1,300,000, equal to the target amount set forth in Mr. Levine’s employment agreement. | |||
The SCT amount includes the value of one-time, discretionary awards granted in January 2021 for 2020 compensation, and do not reflect the Committee’s 2021 compensation decision. | |||||
The time-based award was granted in the form of 23,572 LTIP units, which vested on January 1, 2022 consistent with the terms of Mr. Levine’s employment agreement. | |||||
100% $3,622,156 | 100% $3,375,300 | Both totals include $11,600 of “Other Compensation,” as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. |
60 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Other Compensation Policies and Information
How We Determine Executive Compensation
The Committee determines compensation for our named executive officers and is comprised of three of our independent directors, Lauren B. Dillard (Chair), Edwin T. Burton, III and John S. Levy. John H. Alschuler served a member of the Committee until April 1, 2021.
The Committee receives input from a number of sources each year to inform its final compensation determinations for our named executive officers. These final determinations are made solely by the Committee.
Results | The Committee synthesizes and analyzes the data and information provided by its independent compensation advisor, our | |
Stockholder Engagement | ● The Committee engages with a significant number of stockholders holding a substantial percentage of outstanding shares and considers all feedback it receives on current and prior compensation practices | |
Full Board | ● The Committee makes regular reports to the | |
Chief Executive Officer | ● At the request of the ● Our CEO reviews market data provided by FTI Consulting in formulating compensation recommendations, which the Committee also receives and reviews ● The other named executive officers discuss their performance with our CEO, but otherwise play no role in determining their compensation ● FTI Consulting, which had relationships with certain officers of the Company during 2021, is retained by management as a general business advisor, including for compensation matters | |
Gressle & McGinley LLC |
● Provides updates and relevant data throughout the ● Offers the Committee independent analysis and recommendations concerning executive compensation ● Does not provide any additional services to the Company |
2016Proxy Statement 23
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 61 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Practices
We believe that our executive compensation programs provide appropriate performance-based incentives to attract and retain leadership talent in the highly competitive New York City real estate market, to align management and stockholder interests and to continue to drive our long-term track record of superior return to stockholders. The following are key features of our executive compensation programs, which reflect thereflecting changes we have adopted following our extensive stockholder outreach in recent years:outreach:
WHAT WE DO | |||
WHAT WE DON’T DO | |||
Pay for performance and create alignment with | |||
| |||
Include robust hurdles in Pay a majority of | |||
| |||
| |||
Follow robust | |||
Impose a clawback policy with respect to incentive | |||
Require a double trigger for cash severance and accelerated vesting in connection with a change in |
| ||
No dividends or distributions paid on unearned equity awards subject to performance-based | ||
No excise tax gross-up | ||
| ||
| ||
Don’t allow directors or officers to hedge our |
24 SL Green Realty Corp.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
2015 Total Direct Annual Compensation
The following charts categorize the total direct annual compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and other named executives by the form of such compensation:
| ||||
The following table sets forth the amounts of base salary paid, annual cash and equity bonuses awarded, annual employment agreement equity awards granted, and annual deferred compensation contributions made to our named executive officers for2015:
Name | Base Salary | Cash Bonus(1) | Equity Bonus(2) | Employment Agreement Equity Awards(3) | Annual Deferred Compensation Contribution | 2015 Total Direct Annual Compensation(4) | ||||||||||||
Marc Holliday | $ | 1,050,000 | $ | 2,795,625 | $ | 4,204,375 | $ | 8,978,205 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 17,628,205 | ||||||
Stephen L. Green | $ | 750,000 | $ | 1,671,093 | $ | 2,228,907 | — | $ | 150,000 | $ | 4,800,000 | |||||||
Andrew Mathias | $ | 800,000 | $ | 1,782,500 | $ | 3,217,500 | $ | 6,181,683 | $ | 450,000 | $ | 12,431,683 | ||||||
Matthew DiLiberto | $ | 400,000 | $ | 1,400,000 | — | — | — | $ | 1,800,000 | |||||||||
Andrew S. Levine | $ | 500,000 | — | $ | 1,100,000 | — | — | $ | 1,600,000 |
Comparison of our Chief Executive Officer’s 2014 and 2015 Total Direct Annual Compensation
Our Chief Executive Officer’s annual bonus for 2015 was $1,000,000, or 12.5%, less than his annual bonus for 2014 primarily as a result of our disappointing short-term TRS performance balanced against our continued superior long-term TRS performance and strong operational performance during 2015. The overall increase in our Chief Executive Officer’s total direct annual compensation from 2014 to 2015 is solely attributable to (i) an increase in our stock price from January 2014 to January 2015, which resulted in the grant date fair value of the employment agreement equity awards that we made to our Chief Executive Officer (87,870 LTIP units were granted in both years) being higher in 2015 and (ii) a $50,000 contractual increase in annual deferred compensation contribution.
2016 Proxy Statement 25
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The table below compares the total direct annual compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer in 2014 against compensation paid in 2015.
Compensation Component | 2014(1) | 2015(1) | % Change | |||||
Base Salary | $ | 1,050 | $ | 1,050 | — | |||
Cash Bonus | $ | 3,150 | $ | 2,796 | -11.2% | |||
Equity Bonus | $ | 4,850 | $ | 4,204 | -13.3% | |||
Employment Agreement Equity Awards(2) | $ | 6,524 | $ | 8,978 | 37.6% | |||
Annual Deferred Compensation Contribution | $ | 550 | $ | 600 | 9.1% | |||
Total Direct Compensation | $ | 16,124 | $ | 17,628 | 9.33% |
Our Executive Compensation Philosophy
We adopted an executive compensation philosophy that rewards the achievement of annual and long-term goals of both the Company and individual executives. Our executive compensation programs are designed to achieve the following objectives:
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
In order to reach these goals, the Committee, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer and the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, adopted executive compensation practices that follow a pay-for-performance philosophy. Our primary business objective, of maximizing TRS through growth in FFO while seeking appreciation in the value of our investment properties, demands a long-term focus. Therefore, on both a current and historical basis, our executive compensation programs are based heavily on the achievement of both annual and multi-year performance measures.
Consideration of 2015 Say-on-Pay Vote
Our say-on-pay proposal was approved at our2015 annual meeting, as it has been every year since it was first introduced in2011, with approximately66.4% of the votes cast voting in favor of the proposal. The Committee viewed this favorable vote by more than a majority of our stockholders as an indication that our stockholdersare generally supportive of the structure of our executive compensation programs. Nevertheless, we continued to engage in stockholder outreach and implemented the additional changes described above based on the feedback we received.
Our Executive Compensation Programs
Our named executive officers’ compensation currently has three primary components, which are discussed in more detail below:
| |
| |
|
Variable pay constitutes the vast majority of our executives’ compensation, which allows the Committee to reward superior performance and penalize poor performance, while the substantial long-term equity incentive portions of our compensation programs serve to align the interests of our named executive officers with our stockholders.
Annual Base Salary and Deferred Compensation
Base salaries are established at levels intended to reflect the scope of each executive’s duties and responsibilities and further take into account the competitive market compensation paid by other companies for similar positions. However, they do not serve our objective of paying for performance, and therefore are intentionally structured to be a relatively low percentage of total compensation.
26 SL Green Realty Corp.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following sets forth the annual base salaries for our named executive officers for2014and2015, which reflect amounts agreed to in each executive’s employment agreement:
Executive | 2014 Base Salary | 2015 Base Salary | % Change | |||||
Marc Holliday | $ | 1,050,000 | $ | 1,050,000 | — | |||
Stephen Green | $ | 750,000 | $ | 750,000 | — | |||
Andrew Mathias | $ | 800,000 | $ | 800,000 | — | |||
Matthew DiLiberto | N/A | $ | 400,000 | N/A | ||||
Andrew Levine | $ | 490,000 | $ | 500,000 | 2.0% |
In addition to base salary, each of Messrs. Holliday, Green and Mathias also received a contribution of deferred notional stock units that are subject to vesting based on continued employment during a one-year period following the contribution and are only paid upon termination of employment or a change in control. The amounts of deferred compensation that each of Messrs. Holliday, Green and Mathias received for2015 was equal to the minimum amount that we had previously agreed to provide under the executive’s employment agreement and associated deferred compensation agreement that was in effect for2015. This deferred compensation is viewed similarly to annual base salary, in that fixed amounts are granted each year regardless of performance. However, because the value of this deferred compensation is tied to the value of our common stock and these executives will not receive this deferred compensation until the termination of their employment or a change in control, this deferred compensation program further establishes alignment of management and stockholder interests and helps ensure that the executives remain focused on long-term stockholder value creation. The following table sets forth the deferred compensation grants made to our executives in2015:
Executive | Deferred Compensation Amount | Notional Stock Units(1) | |||
Marc Holliday | $ | 600,000 | 4,791 | ||
Stephen Green | $ | 150,000 | 1,233 | ||
Andrew Mathias | $ | 450,000 | 3,699 |
Annual Incentive Awards
We pay annual incentive awards in the form of annual cash and equity bonuses to focus and reward our named executive officers on achieving key corporate financial and operational objectives and individual goals. Based in part on the feedback we received in connection with our outreach efforts relating to executive compensation, the Committee decided to revise the structure of our annual incentive award program for2014. For2015, we maintained the same overall structure of our annual incentive award program. Based in part on the feedback we received in connection with our continuing outreach efforts relating to executive compensation, we increased the formulaic component of our annual cash bonus program from60% to75% of the target opportunity and we reduced the number of performance criteria. For2015, the entire amount of the annual cash bonuses paid to our top three named executive officers was determined pursuant to this annual cash bonus program, which is described in more detail below.
We also maintained an annual equity bonus program for these named executive officers pursuant to which these executives were eligible to receive an annual bonus paid in the form of equity in amounts determined at theCommittee’s discretion. In determining the amounts of these equity bonuses for2015, the Committee considered our short-term and long-term performance, including the achievement of the financial and operational goals that we established and communicated to investors at our investor day conference in December2014, as well as the Committee’s view of the appropriate overall annual incentive award for each of these executives in light of the their historical compensation, skill, experience and position and competitive market factors.
Consistent with our historical practice, our other named executive officers’ annual incentive awards were determined in the Committee’s discretion in substantially the same manner as the equity bonuses for our top three named executive officers. These bonuses were then paid in cash, equity or a combination as determined by the Committee.
Annual Cash Bonus Program (Top Three Named Executive Officers)
As noted above, the annual cash bonuses paid to our top three named executive officers for2015 were determined pursuant to our annual cash bonus program. Pursuant to this program, the Committee established specific threshold, target and maximum cash bonus amounts that each of
2016 Proxy Statement 27
our top three named executive officers could earn for 2015 and established specific performance criteria that were to be used in a formulaic manner to determine 75% of each of these executives’ cash bonuses. For 2015, each of Messrs. Holliday, Green and Mathias were eligible to earn the following percentages of his base salary (with linear interpolation used to determine the percentage earned for performance that falls between threshold, target and/or maximum):
Executive | Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||
Marc Holliday | 100% | 200% | 300% | |||
Stephen Green | 100% | 175% | 250% | |||
Andrew Mathias | 100% | 175% | 250% |
Seventy-five percent of each executive’s annual cash bonus was determined in a formulaic manner based on the level of our achievement of a number of performance criteria as compared to the level established in advance by the Committee. The following set forth the specific performance criteria selected for2015, the relative weighting of each, the threshold, target and maximum performance levels established by the Committee in advance for each, and our actual 2015 results for each:
Performance criteria | 2015 Weighting Levels | Threshold | Target | Maximum | 2015 Actual Performance | |||||||||
FFO per share | 12.5% | $ | 6.13 | $ | 6.22 | $ | 6.30 | $ | 6.38 | |||||
Annual square footage of Manhattan leases signed | 12.5% | 1,500,000 | 1,650,000 | 1,800,000 | 2,255,733 | |||||||||
Mark-to-market on signed Manhattan leases | 12.5% | 6.0% | 9.0% | 12.0% | 15.3% | |||||||||
Same-store cash NOI growth | 12.5% | 2.1% | 2.6% | 3.1% | 4.6% | |||||||||
Dividend growth | 10.0% | 5.0% | 7.5% | 10% | 20.0% | |||||||||
Relative TRS for 2015(1) | 7.5% | 40th | 60th | 80th | 39th | |||||||||
Absolute TRS for 2015 | 7.5% | 5.0% | 7.0% | 9.0% | -2.97% |
The remaining 25% of each executive’s annual cash bonus was determined in the Committee’s discretion based on our overall performance and each executive’s performance for 2015. In determining this component of each executive’s annual cash bonus, the Committee primarily based its decisions on our performance as compared to our initial FFO per share guidance for 2015 and the other specific company goals and objectives for 2015 that were presented at the 2014 investor day conference, which are repeated below:
28 SL Green Realty Corp.
Based on our operational performance, as reflected in the level of our achievement of these goals and objectives, the Committee awarded each of our executives the maximum amount with respect to the discretionary component of our cash bonus program, which was then added to the formulaic component of our cash bonus program.
The following table reflects the 2015 cash bonuses awarded to Messrs. Holliday, Green and Mathias pursuant to our annual cash bonus program, presented based on the maximum percentages of each executive’s base salary that can be earned under both the formulaic and discretionary components, as well as the aggregate amounts of the total bonus opportunity earned:
Executive | Max Formulaic (%) | Actual Formulaic (%)(1) | Max Discretionary (%) | Actual Discretionary (%) | Max Cash Bonus (%) | Actual Cash Bonus (%) | Total ($) | ||||||||
Marc Holliday | 225.00% | 191.25% | 75.00% | 75.00% | 300.00% | 266.25% | $ | 2,795,625 | |||||||
Stephen Green | 187.50% | 160.31% | 62.50% | 62.50% | 250.00% | 222.81% | $ | 1,671,093 | |||||||
Andrew Mathias | 187.50% | 160.31% | 62.50% | 62.50% | 250.00% | 222.81% | $ | 1,782,500 |
Annual Equity Bonuses (Top Three Named Executive Officers)
We also maintain an equity bonus program for our top three named executive officers, which provides annual bonuses that are determined by the Committee, in its discretion, based on the short-term and long-term performance of our Company and the executive, the Committee’s view of appropriate annual incentive awards in light of the executive’s historical compensation, skill, experience and position, competitive market factors and such other factors as are determined appropriate by the Committee. In making these awards for 2015, the Committee sought to find a balance between (i) acknowledging the significant operational achievements attained during the year, as highlighted above, (ii) ensuring that annual incentive award and total compensation amounts were in line with the prevailing market and adequate to address recruitment and retention needs in the competitive New York City commercial real estate markets where we actively compete for business opportunities and executive talent with other publicly-traded REITs, private real estate operating companies, opportunity funds and sovereign wealth funds, among others, (iii) continuing to ensure our compensation programs create shoulder-to-shoulder alignment of management and stockholder interests by appropriately rewarding our named executive officers for the attainment of performance achievements that drive long-term value creation and (iv) rewarding our continued superior long-term TRS performance as balanced against our disappointing short-term TRS performance. The differences in compensation awarded to our named executive officers are generally a function of the executive’s position and authority, as well as the competitive landscape for executives in similar positions. The table below sets forth the annual equity bonus awards that were granted to each of Messrs. Holliday, Green and Mathias for 2014 and 2015, as approved by the Committee:
Executive | 2014 Equity Bonus | 2015 Equity Bonus | % Change | |||||
Marc Holliday | $ | 4,850,000 | $ | 4,204,375 | -13.3% | |||
Stephen Green | $ | 2,625,000 | $ | 2,228,907 | -15.1% | |||
Andrew Mathias | $ | 3,700,000 | $ | 3,217,500 | -13.0% |
The reduction in the amounts of the equity bonus awards for our executives in 2015as compared to 2014 primarily resulted from our disappointing TRS performance in 2015. The 2015 equity bonuses paid to each of our top three named executive officers listed above were paid in early 2016 in the form of LTIP units that vested upon grant, but remain subject to a no-sell restriction until two years after their grant date. Our named executive officers received the following number of LTIP units for these equity bonuses: Mr. Holliday—40,153; Mr. Green—21,286; and Mr. Mathias—30,728.
Bonuses to Other Executives
Consistent with our historical practice, annual bonuses for Messrs. DiLiberto and Levine were determined by the Committee in its discretion in substantially the same manner as the equity bonuses for our top three named executive officers. The table below sets forth the annual bonus awards that were granted to Mr. DiLiberto for 2015 and Mr. Levine for 2014 and 2015, as approved by the Committee:
Executive | 2014Bonus | 2015Bonus | % Change | |||||
Matthew J. DiLiberto | N/A | $ | 1,400,000 | N/A | ||||
Andrew S. Levine | $ | 1,200,000 | $ | 1,100,000 | -8.3% |
Similar to the annual equity bonus awards that were granted to our top three named executive officers, annual bonuses for Messrs. DiLiberto and Levine reflected our significant operational achievements for 2015 and our continued superior long-term TRS performance as balanced against our disappointing short-term TRS performance for 2015. The Committee decided to pay Mr. DiLiberto’s bonus in cash and Mr. Levine’s bonus in the form of LTIP units granted in January 2016 that were vested upon grant, but are subject to a no-sell restriction until two years after the date they were granted. Mr. Levine received 10,505 LTIP units for this bonus.
Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards
Long-term equity incentives have been provided to our named executive officers through the grant of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and/or LTIP units pursuant to our outperformance plans and in connection with new or extended employment agreements. The majority of these awards included performance-based vesting hurdles that must be met in order for recipients to earn them. The grant of equity awards links a named executive officer’s compensation and net worth directly to the performance of our stock price as well as the achievement of other performance-based vesting hurdles in some cases, which we believe encourages our named executive officers to make decisions with an ownership mentality and provides alignment of interest with our stockholders. The Committee has made long-term equity incentive awards a central part of our executive compensation program due to these features.
Outperformance Plans
A main component of our long-term equity incentive award program is our outperformance plans. Our outperformance plans provide equity awards to our named executive officers and other employees that are subject to performance-based vesting hurdles based on TRS or stock price appreciation over a multi-year period, eligible for potential acceleration in specific circumstances. In addition to the performance-based vesting hurdles, all of these equity awards have additional time-based vesting provisions of four to five years in the aggregate with principally back-end vesting, based on continued employment, which act as a retention device and provide a strong incentive to the executives to increase stockholder value during the vesting period.
Our outperformance plans are designed to provide strong and direct alignment of our executive’s interests with long-term stockholder interests. As a result, historically, we provided a meaningful percentage of our executives’ total compensation in the form of equity awards under our outperformance plans. We anticipate continuing to utilize these types of plans as a significant component of our executive compensation program.
To guarantee that our long-term equity incentive awards reward only exceptional returns, our outperformance plans incorporate challenging performance hurdles. During prior periods where stockholders did not realize superior returns, such as during 2008 and 2009, our outperformance plans did not provide payouts. Due to the variable, at-risk nature of our outperformance plans, our executives must truly drive our overall performance and TRS to earn awards. This feature is illustrated by the table below showing our strong TRS during the performance periods of our two previous outperformance plans and the awards earned by our executives pursuant to those plans, as compared to our performance through December 31, 2015 relative to the robust performance hurdles contained in our 2014 Outperformance Plan:
2010Notional Unit Long-Term Compensation Plan | 2011Outperformance Plan | 2014Outperformance Plan | ||||
Performance Period | Dec. 2009 – Nov. 2012 | Sept. 2011 – Aug. 2014 | Sept. 2014 – Aug. 2017 | |||
Initial Stock Price | $42.37 | $73.38 | $109.36 | |||
Maximum Plan Award | $75.0 million | $85.0 million | 610,000 LTIP units | |||
Cumulative Absolute | 25% - 50% | 25% - 38% | 25% - 50% | |||
Hurdle Range | ||||||
Absolute Hurdle Achieved? | YES – 85% TRS | YES – 54% TRS | NOT YET – 6.6% TRS for the | |||
($76.42 + $1.80 | ($109.36 + $3.92 | 16 months ended 12/31/15 | ||||
dividends) | dividends) | ($112.98 + $3.62 dividends) | ||||
Cumulative Relative Hurdle Range | N/A | N/A | 50th percentile – 75th percentile | |||
Relative Hurdle Achieved? | N/A | N/A | NOT YET – 48th percentile for | |||
the 16 months ended 12/31/15 |
30 SL Green Realty Corp.
2014 Outperformance Plan
In August 2014, the Committee approved the general terms of our 2014 Outperformance Plan. Under our 2014Outperformance Plan, participants may earn awards based on our TRS on an absolute basis as well as on a relative basis compared to the constituents of the MSCI US REIT Index, or Index Companies, over a three-year performance period beginning on September 1, 2014 and continuing through August 31, 2017. Awards earned based on absolute TRS will be determined independently of awards earned based on relative TRS.
Our 2014 Outperformance Plan was designed to be complementary to the SL Green Realty Corp. 2011 Long-Term Outperformance Plan, or our 2011 Outperformance Plan, as the baseline stock price for measuring performance under our 2014 Outperformance Plan exceeds the stock price at which maximum stock price appreciation would be achieved under our 2011 Outperformance Plan.
Awards that are earned under our 2014 Outperformance Plan will also be subject to vesting based on continued employment through August 31, 2018, with 50% of the awards earned vesting on August 31, 2017 and the remaining 50% vesting on August 31, 2018. The maximum number of LTIP units that may be earned under our 2014 Outperformance Plan will be 610,000 LTIP units; however, as of the date hereof, the Committee has only granted awards for 426,671 LTIP units and will retain discretion as to whether, or when, it will award the remainder of the total LTIP units.
For each individual award, two-thirds of the LTIP units may be earned based on our absolute TRS and one-third of the LTIP units may be earned based on our relative TRS compared to Index Companies. The table below reflects the minimum and maximum thresholds for both the absolute TRS and relative TRS components:
Absolute TRS | Percentage of Absolute TRS LTIP Units Earned (two-thirds of total) | Relative TRS | Percentage of Relative TRS LTIP Units Earned (one-third of total) | ||||
Less than 25% | 0% | Below 50th percentile | 0% | ||||
25% | 37.5% | 50th percentile | 37.5% | ||||
50% or higher | 100% | 75th percentile or greater | 100% |
The number of LTIP units that are earned if performance is above the minimum thresholds, but below the maximum hurdles, will be determined based on linear interpolation between the percentages earned at the minimum and maximum thresholds.
In the event our performance reaches the maximum absolute TRS or relative TRS hurdle before the end of the three-year performance period, a pro-rata portion of the maximum award may be earned. For each component, if our performance reaches the maximum threshold during the second half of the performance period, participants will earn one-third of the maximum award. If our performance reaches the maximum threshold during the third year of the performance period for a component, participants will earn up to two-thirds of the maximum award that may be earned for that component. Except in the event of a change in control, no awards may be earned during the first half of the performance period and, with respect to the last one-third of the maximum award, no awards may be earned prior to the end of the performance period.
Awards may be earned upon a change in control as follows, but any such awards remain subject to vesting based on continued employment, as set forth above, with acceleration only occurring for a named executive officer in the event of a termination of the executive’s employment by us without cause or by the executive for good reason. In the event of a change in control during the first year of the performance period, participants will earn, for each component, the greater of (i) a prorated award based on the attainment of prorated performance hurdles or (ii) a non-prorated award based on attainment of the full, non-prorated performance hurdles, in each case, using the change in control as the end of the performance period. In the event a change in control occurs after the first year of the performance period, awards will be earned for each component based upon the attainment of prorated performance hurdles using the change in control as the end of the performance period.
2016 Proxy Statement 31
The awards made to our named executive officers under our 2014 Outperformance Plan also provide that if that executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive officer for good reason, then the executive officer is treated under our 2014 Outperformance Plan as if he had remained employed by us for 12 months after the date of his termination. If the executive officer’s employment terminates due to death or disability, then such termination will be treated in the same manner, for that award recipient, as if a change in control occurred on the date of such termination; provided that any LTIP units earned in connection with death or disability will vest in full as of the date on which they are earned.
Distributions are not payable unless and until awards are earned. If awards are earned under our 2014 Outperformance Plan, each participant will then be entitled to the distributions that would have been paid had the number of earned LTIP units been earned at the beginning of the performance period. Those distributions will be paid in cash or additional LTIP units as determined by the Committee. Thereafter, distributions will be paid currently with respect to all earned LTIP units, whether vested or unvested.
Initial awards under our 2014 Outperformance Plan have been made pursuant to which our named executive officers have the opportunity to earn the following LTIP units:
Award Opportunity (# of LTIP Units) | ||||||
Executive | Threshold | Maximum | Hypothetical Earning Based on Annualized Results through 12/31/2015(1) | |||
Marc Holliday | 25,925 | 69,133 | 0 | |||
Stephen L. Green | 8,427 | 22,473 | 0 | |||
Andrew Mathias | 18,300 | 48,800 | 0 | |||
Matthew DiLiberto | 6,621 | 17,657 | 0 | |||
Andrew S. Levine | 4,635 | 12,360 | 0 |
Pursuant to our employment agreements with Messrs. Holliday and Mathias, we agreed to allocate at least 22.67% and 16.00%, respectively, of the total awards under our 2014 Outperformance Plan to these executives.
Employment Agreement Awards
The second main component of our long-term equity incentive award program is equity awards granted for retention purposes or in connection with new or extended employment agreements. We typically enter into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers, other than Mr. Green, that have terms of three or four years. In connection with these agreements, we typically grant one or more types of equity awards to our named executive officers that have vesting periods aligned with the terms of these agreements. Vesting of these awards has been based on continued employment and, for a majority of these awards, the achievement of performance hurdles.
In connection with our employment agreements with our named executive officers, we granted equity awards to Messrs. Mathias, DiLiberto and Levine on the effective date of each such agreement. In addition, our employment agreements with Messrs. Holliday and Mathias provided for the granting of the stock options and LTIP units noted in the table below, which, collectively for each of Mr. Holliday and Mr. Mathias, are scheduled to vest over the three-year term of the agreement. These long-term equity incentive awards were not granted at the time these agreements were entered into; instead, these agreements provided that the executives would be entitled to terminate their employment with us and receive severance payments and benefits if we did not make these grants on or before their scheduled vesting dates. These provisions were included instead of making long-term grants at the time the agreement was entered into, in part, to avoid the distortion in measuring annual compensation that otherwise might have occurred if these grants were all made in the year in which we entered into the agreements. Regardless of the ultimate grant dates, for purposes of evaluating our executive compensation, we believe these awards should be viewed collectively as long-term equity awards vesting over the three-year terms of these agreements (as opposed to three separate awards subject to short-term vesting), which is consistent with how the Committee viewed, and approved of, these awards.
The table below indicates the terms of the employments agreements with Messrs. Holliday, Mathias, DiLiberto and Levine that were in effect during 2015 and summarizes the terms and grant dates of the long-term equity incentive awards made, or to be made, to our named executive officers pursuant to these employment agreements.
32 SL Green Realty Corp.
Messrs. Holliday and Mathias amended their employment agreements in 2014 such that 100% of the future LTIP unit awards granted under these employment agreements were subject to performance-based vesting hurdles, with restructured hurdles that are more difficult to achieve than those originally established, as set forth in the table below.
MARC HOLLIDAY (JANUARY18,2013– JANUARY17,2016) | |||||||||
Equity Award | # of Shares/Units | Grant Date | Description(1) | ||||||
Stock options | 200,000 | 2013 | One-third vesting on 1/17/14, 1/17/15 and 1/17/16; 50% expires 5 years after grant;50% expires 10 years after grant | ||||||
Three- Year vesting | Performance-based and time-based LTIP units | 87,870 | 2014 | Vesting 1/17/14; 60% subject to performance-based vesting contingent upon achievement of either7% increase in FFO, 7% TRS or TRS in the top40% of the MSCI US REIT Index, for the prior year (or on a cumulative basis from2013); two-year post-vesting no-sale | |||||
Performance-based LTIP units | 87,870 | 2015 | Vesting 1/17/15 and 1/17/16, respectively; vesting contingent upon achievement of either8% increase in FFO, 8% TRS or TRS in the top35% of the MSCI US REIT Index, for the prior year (or on a cumulative basis from2013); two-year post-vesting no-sale | ||||||
Performance-based LTIP units | 87,870 | 2016 | |||||||
ANDREW MATHIAS (JANUARY1,2014– DECEMBER31,2016)(2) | |||||||||
Equity Award | # of Shares/Units | Grant Date | Description(1) | ||||||
Stock options | 130,000 | 2013 | One-third vesting on 12/31/14, 12/31/15 and 12/31/16; 50% expires 5years after grant; 50% expires 10 years after grant | ||||||
Three- Year vesting | Performance-based and time-based LTIP units | 58,666 | 2014 | Vesting 12/31/14; 60% subject to performance-based vesting contingent upon achievement of either7% increase in FFO, 7% TRS or TRS in the top40% of the MSCI US REIT Index, for the prior year (or on a cumulative basis from2014); two-year post-vesting no-sale | |||||
Performance-based LTIP units | 58,667 | 2015 | Vesting 12/31/15 and 12/31/16, respectively; vesting contingent upon achievement of either8% increase in FFO, 8% TRS or TRS in the top35% of the MSCI US REIT Index, for the prior year (or on a cumulative basis from2014); two-year post-vesting no-sale | ||||||
Performance-based LTIP units | 58,667 | 2016 | |||||||
MATTHEW DILIBERTO (JANUARY1,2015– JANUARY1,2018) | |||||||||
Equity Award | # of Shares/Units | Grant Date | Description(1) | ||||||
Time-based LTIP units | 13,000 | 2014 | 6,000 LTIP units vesting 1/1/16 and 3,500 LTIP units vesting on each of1/1/17 and 1/1/18 | ||||||
Performance-based LTIP units | 7,000 | 2014 | One-half vesting on each of 1/1/17 and 1/1/18; vesting contingent upon achievement of either8% increase in FFO, 8% TRS or TRS in the top35% of the MSCI US REIT Index, for the prior year (or on a cumulative basis from2015) | ||||||
ANDREW S. LEVINE (JANUARY1,2013– JANUARY1,2016) | |||||||||
Equity Award | # of Shares/Units | Grant Date | Description(1) | ||||||
Time-based LTIP units | 21,000 | 2013 | One-third vesting on 1/1/14, 1/1/15 and 1/1/16 | ||||||
Performance-based LTIP units | 21,000 | 2013 | One-third vesting on 1/1/14, 1/1/15 and 1/1/16; vesting contingent upon achievement of either7% increase in FFO, 7% TRS or TRS in the top40% of the MSCI US REIT Index, for the prior year (or on a cumulative basis from2013) |
2016 Proxy Statement 33
In 2016, we entered into new employment agreements with each of Messrs. Holliday and Levine following the expiration of their prior employment agreements. The structure of Mr. Holliday’s new employment agreement was similar to his prior employment agreement in that the long-term equity incentive awards to be made to Mr. Holliday were not granted at the time this agreement was entered into and, instead, these agreements provided that Mr. Holliday would be entitled to terminate his employment with us and receive severance payments and benefits if we did not make these grants on or before their scheduled vesting dates. However, unlike Mr. Holliday’s prior agreement, he is no longer entitled to receive ungranted performance-based LTIP units upon a termination for good reason or without cause, except where such termination also occurs in connection with a change-in-control. The table below indicates the terms of these employment agreements and summarizes the terms and grant dates of the long-term equity incentive awards made, or to be made, to Messrs. Holliday and Levine pursuant to these employment agreements.
MARC HOLLIDAY (JANUARY18,2016– JANUARY17,2019) | ||||||
Equity Award | # of Shares/Units | Grant Date | Description(1) | |||
Stock options | 105,000 | 2016 | Vesting one-year after grant date, which grant is to occur on or before 7/1/16; 50% expires5 years after grant; 50% expires 10 years after grant | |||
Stock options | 105,000 | 2017 | Vesting one-year after grant date, which grant is to occur one year after the 2016 grant; 50% expires 5 years after grant; 50% expires 10years after grant | |||
Performance-based LTIP units | 76,980 | 2017 | Vesting 1/17/17, 1/17/18 and 1/17/19, respectively, contingent on achievement of performance hurdle; from 50-100% vestingbased on achievement of either annual FFO growth or TRS of 5-8% per year or TRS in the top 35-50% of the MSCI US REIT Index, respectively, for the prior year (or on a cumulative basis from 2016 through such year or a subsequent quarter during the term); no vesting unless the 50% threshold performance criteria described above is met; two-year post-vesting no-sale | |||
Performance-based LTIP units | 61,584 | 2018 | ||||
Performance-based LTIP units | 61,584 | 2019 | ||||
ANDREW S. LEVINE (JANUARY 1, 2016 – JANUARY 1, 2019) | ||||||
Equity Award | # of Shares/Units | Grant Date | Description(1) | |||
Time-based LTIP units | 18,000 | 2016 | One-third vesting on 1/1/17, 1/1/18 and 1/1/19 | |||
Performance-based LTIP units | 18,000 | 2016 | One-third vesting on 1/1/17, 1/1/18 and 1/1/19 contingent on achievement of performance hurdle; from 50-100% vesting based on achievement of either annual FFO growth or TRS of 5-8% per year or TRS in the top35-50% of the MSCI US REIT Index, respectively, for the prior year (or on a cumulative basis from2016 through such year or a subsequent quarter during the term); no vesting unless the50% threshold performance criteria described above is met |
Other Compensation Policies and Information
How We Determine Executive Compensation
The Committee determines compensation for our named executive officers and is comprised of three of our independent directors, John H. Alschuler (Chairman), Edwin Thomas Burton, III and John S. Levy.
Independent Compensation Consultant/Compensation Process
The Committee retained Gressle & McGinley LLC as its independent outside compensation consulting firm and engaged Gressle & McGinley LLC to provide the Committee with relevant data concerning the marketplace, our peer group and its own independent analysis and recommendations concerning executive compensation. Gressle & McGinley LLC regularly participates in Compensation Committee meetings. Gressle & McGinley LLC does not provide any additional services to the Committee and does not provide any services to the Company other than to the Committee. Their sole role is as an independent consulting firm to advise the Committee with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers. The ultimate determination of total compensation and the elements that comprise that total compensation is made solely by the Committee.
With respect to our named executive officers, the Committee solicits recommendations from our Chief Executive Officer regarding total compensation, the allocation of this compensation among base salary, annual bonus amounts and other long-term incentive compensation, as well as the portion of overall compensation to be provided in cash or equity. Our Chairman also advises the Committee on these matters as they pertain to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer. FTI Consulting, Inc., or FTI Consulting, is retained by our management as a general business advisor
34 SL Green Realty Corp.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
and provides services to the Company in a number of areas, including compensation. FTI Consulting, which has relationships with certain officers of the Company, provides market data to our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, which they review when considering their compensation recommendations. The recommendations with respect to compensation are formulated by our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman and are communicated to the Committee by them. The Committee is also provided with the market data compiled by FTI Consulting and its recommendations with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers. The other named executive officers do not play a role in determining their own compensation, other than discussing their performance with our Chief Executive Officer.
All final determinations of compensation for our named executive officers are made solely by the Committee.
The Committee meets during the year to evaluate executive performance, to monitor market conditions in light of our goals and objectives, to solicit input from our independent compensation consultant on market practices, including peer group pay practices and new developments, and to review our executive compensation practices. As part of these meetings, in formulation of its executive compensation policies and practices for 2015, the Committee reviewed then-existing policies of certain of our institutional investors, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., or ISS, Glass Lewis & Co LLC and other governance groups, as well as feedback provided by such groups in prior year proxy research reports. The Committee is currently engaged with stockholders, as discussed above, and annually reviews our executive compensation policies and practices to ensure that such policies are in line with current market practices and stockholders’ best interests. The Committee makes regular reports to the Board.
Peer Group Benchmarking
In 2015,2021, as in prior years, the Committee reviewed various peer compensation information in connection with its compensation decisions, primarily focused on the chief executive officer’s compensation. The Committee didThis peer information was not use this peer informationused to target a particular percentile for our Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation for 2015,2021, but rather used this information to confirm that our Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation for 20152021 was within an appropriate range of the total compensation, received by the chief executive officers of these peers, considering relative size and performance. With respect to size, we ranked above the median of these peers with respect to common equity market capitalization and total revenue.
The Committee reviewed2014totalreviewed total compensation information for the chief executive officers of a New York City traditional REIT peer group, andwith an emphasis on the top25and top50public REITs.REIT industry. The Committee utilizedpeer group included a number of New York City-based peer group giventhecompanies. That decision is based on the unique characteristics of the New York City real estate marketplace, in which is where we conduct substantially all of our business, and which is one of the most competitive in the world, from both a business and compensation perspective. However, among the top 15 New York City real estate companies – in terms of Manhattan office-space ownership – only a handful of those companies, including SL Green, are public.
With respect to size, we ranked at or above the median of our selected peers with respect to total enterprise value and total revenue as of December 31, 2021. The following companies were included in the New York City traditional REIT peer group that the Committee reviewed:
Peer Group
(in billions) | REVENUE (in billions) | |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Our direct New York City competitors, both in termsSource: S&P Capital IQ. Data as of December 31, 2021.
62 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
In the market for talent and compensation, the Committee views SLG as most comparable to real estate businesscompanies and talent, are not limited to other public REITs doing businesscompanies in New York City. Rather, the Committee also views our competitorscomplex financial services-related industries such as consisting of top performing hedge funds, international investors, large private firms and others that may have equal or greater financial resources, including access to cost-efficient capital. TheMany of these most direct competitors are private companies, however, and are not required to publicly disclose their compensation arrangements, though the Committee believes that the top real estate principals of these non-REIT companies typically receive substantially higher compensation than chief executive officers oftheir counterparts at public REITs. However, based on feedback fromNonetheless, to ensure the rigor of our stockholders,compensation program benchmarking, we removed all New York City-based asset managers fromhave limited our peer group in 2015to companies for which there is sufficient publicly available information to thoroughly and committed, on a going forward basis, to review compensation based on our New York City traditional REITcompletely evaluate the comparability of any given peer group and a national office REIT index.company.
Given limited publicly available information on the private companies with which we most directly compete for real estate talent, we have elected to include only public REITs in our compensation peer group. |
Due to the limited number of REITs with an executive chairman who does not also serve as the chief executive officer, the Committee also reviewed information from the following REITs that have an executive serving in this role in order to assist the Committee with its compensation determinations for our Executive Chairman: Boston Properties, Inc.; CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.; Colony Financial, Inc.; Hyatt Hotels Corporation; Kimco Realty Corporation; Marriott International, Inc.; Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust; and RLJ Lodging Trust.
Analysis of Risk Associated with Our Executive Compensation Plans
In setting compensation, we also consider the risks to our stockholders and to achievement of our goals that may be inherent in the executive compensation program. We concluded that it is not reasonably likely that our compensation policies and practices will have a material adverse effect on us.
Although a significant portion ofIn reaching our executive’s compensation is performance-based and “at-risk,”conclusion, we believe our executive compensation programs are appropriately structured and do not pose a material risk to the Company. We considered the following elementsaspects of our executive compensation plans and policies when evaluating whether such plans and policies encourage our executives to take unreasonable risks:among others:
● | We evaluate performance based upon the achievement of a variety of business objectives and |
2016Proxy Statement35
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
● | We |
● | We provide a significant portion of incentive compensation in the form of |
● | We structure payouts under our performance-based awards based on achieving a minimum level of performance, so that some compensation is awarded at levels below full target achievement rather than an “all-or-nothing” |
● |
|
We provide a significant portion of each executive’s annual compensation in the form of equity-based | |
● | We adopted a policy for recoupment of incentive payments made to our executives, including our named executive officers, if payment was based on having met or exceeded performance expectations during a period of fraudulent activity for which the executive is responsible. |
In conclusion,Accordingly, although a significant portion of our executives’ compensation is performance-based and “at-risk,” we believe our executive compensation program isprograms are appropriately structured so that (i)and do not pose a material risk to the Company.
Executive and Director Equity Ownership Guidelines
In furtherance of the Committee’s ongoing efforts to foster an ownership culture among our senior leadership team, we avoid the typeadopted equity ownership guidelines for our named executive officers and non-employee directors, as set forth below:
Named Executive Officers and Non-Employee Directors | Multiple of Base Salary or Annual Cash Retainer | |
Chief Executive Officer | 8x | |
Other Named Executive Officers | 6x | |
Non-Employee Directors | 5x |
All of disproportionately large short-term incentives that could encourage executives to take risks that may not be in our long-term interests, (ii) we provide incentives to manage the Company for long-term performance, (iii) we have adopted a policy for recoupment of incentive payments under certain circumstances and (iv)named executive officers hold a significant amount of equity in our Company and are highly incentivized to create sustainable, long-term stockholder value.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 63 |
Named Executive Officers | Actual Equity Ownership - Multiple of Base Salary(1) | |
Marc Holliday | 71x | |
Andrew Mathias | 88x | |
Matthew J. DiLiberto | 14x | |
Andrew S. Levine | 28x |
(1) | As of March 25, 2022. |
Outstanding Annual Equity Award Performance Summary (2019-2021)
Operational Awards | Actual Percentage Earned as of 12/31/2021 | Actual / Projected Absolute TSR Modifier as of 12/31/202 | ||
2021 Operational Component | 200.00% (Actual) | +12.5% (Projected) | ||
2020 Operational Component | 115.44% (Actual) | -12.5% (Projected) | ||
2019 Operational Component | 150.10% (Actual) | -12.5% (Actual) | ||
Relative Awards | Actual / Projected Percentile Rank as of 12/31/2021 | Actual / Projected Percentage Earned as of 12/31/2021 | ||
2021 Relative TSR vs. Office REIT Peers | 78th Percentile (Projected) | 225.00% (Projected) | ||
2021 Relative TSR vs. NYC REIT Peers | 58th Percentile (Projected) | 152.82% (Projected) | ||
2020 Relative TSR vs. Office REIT Peers | 51st Percentile (Projected) | 105.88% (Projected) | ||
2020 Relative TSR vs. NYC REIT Peers | 100th Percentile (Projected) | 225.00% (Projected) | ||
2019 Relative TSR vs. Office REIT Peers | 36th Percentile (Actual) | 57.98% (Actual) |
Our 2020 and 2019 annual performance-based equity awards generally have the wealthsame structure as the 2021 performance-based equity awards described above in “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Our 2021 Executive Compensation Program.” However, for 2020 the relative component was weighted 66.67% to the Office REIT Peers and 33.33% to the NYC REIT Peers (rather than 50% each for 2021). For 2019, the relative TSR component was weighted 100% to the Office REIT Peers. These prior awards are described in full in our proxy statements relating to our 2020 and 2019 fiscal years.
For additional information regarding the number of LTIP units relating to each of our executives is tied tooutstanding annual performance-based equity awards held by each of our long-term success. We believe this combination of factors encourages our executives to manage the Company in a prudent manner.named executive officers, see “—Executive Compensation Tables—Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End 2021.”
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
We do not provide significant perquisites or personal benefits to our named executive officers, except that we reimburseprovided leased automobiles for our Chief Executive Officer Chairmanfor all of 2021 and our President for costs associated with automobiles theya portion of 2021. In October 2021, our President’s car lease terminated and we instead provided a company-owned car for personalhis use. Additionally, weWe also provide our Chairman with a full-time driver andautomobile insurance premiums for these vehicles. Additionally, our Chief Executive Officer receives certain life insurance benefits. The costs of these benefits constitute only a small percentageconstituted less than one percent of the applicable executive’s compensation.
Employment Agreements
As noted above, we have employment agreements with all of our named executive officers. All of the employment agreements with our named executive officers provide for, among other things, severance payments and benefits and acceleration of equity awards in connection with certain qualified terminations. In return, each of our named executive officers has agreed to non-compete, non-solicitation, non-interference and confidentiality provisions. For each of our executives, we believe that, because the severance level is negotiated up front, it makes it easier for us to terminate these executives without the need for protracted negotiations over severance. We also believe that providing pre-negotiated severance benefits for all of our executives in the event they are terminated without cause or terminate their employment for good reason following a change in control helps to further align the interests of our executives and our stockholders in the event
64 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
of a potentially attractive proposed change in control transaction following which one or more of our executives may be expected to be terminated. See “Executive Compensation—“—Executive Compensation Tables—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control”Change in Control” for a summary of the employment agreements with our named executive officers.
Clawback Policy
The Board adopted a clawback policy under which any incentive payments made to a named executive officer on the basis of having met or exceeded performance targets during a period of fraudulent activity for which such executive is found personally responsible may be recouped by the Company.
36SL Green Realty Corp.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Anti-hedging Policy
The Board has adopted a policy prohibiting all of our executive officers and directors from engaging in hedging transactions with respect to our securities. Pursuant to this policy, our executive officers and directors may not engage in hedging transactions with respect to our securities (including, without limitation, partnership interests in our operating partnership) through puts, calls, covered calls, synthetic purchases, collars, other derivative securities of the Company or otherwise at any time. Prior to the adoption of this policy, none of our executive officers or directors were engaging in any hedging transactions with respect to our securities, and this policy was adopted to formally reflect the practices that our executive officers and directors had already been observing. The Company does not have any practices or policies regarding the ability of any other employees to purchase financial instruments or otherwise engage in transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of the Company’s equity securities.
Other Matters
Tax Treatment. The Committee reviews – LTIP units and considers the tax efficiency of executive compensation as part of its decision-making process. Section 162(m) of the IRC generally limits the deductibility of compensation over $1million to a corporation’s named executive officers. We are a real estate investment trust and therefore generally does not pay income taxes. In addition, our named executive officers provide most of their services to our operating partnership. We received a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service to the effect that the deduction limitation of Section 162(m) does not apply with respect to compensation to our named executive officers for services rendered to our operating partnership. As a result, the amounts and form of compensation that we provide to our named executive officers is not materially impacted by Section 162(m) of the IRC.
Class O LTIP units. Under our 2014 Outperformance Plan, in lieu of issuing shares of restricted stock, we
We issued a separate class of units of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership, which we refer to as LTIP units. We also used LTIP units, for the equity bonuses that we granted to our named executive officers for 20152021 and as equity awards granted in connection with new or extended employment agreements or the provisions of such agreements. LTIP units are similar to common units in our operating partnership, which generally are economically equivalent to shares of our common stock, except that the LTIP units are structured as “profits interests” for U.S. federal income tax purposes under current federal income tax law. As profits interests, LTIP units generally only have value, other than with respect to the right to receive distributions, if the value of the assets of our operating partnership increases between the issuance of LTIP units and the date of a book-up event for partnership tax purposes. If the value of the assets of our operating partnership increases sufficiently, the LTIP units can achieve full parity with common units in our operating partnership. If such parity is achieved, LTIP units may be converted, subject to the satisfaction of applicable vesting conditions, on a one-for-one basis into common units, which in turn are redeemable by the holder for cash or, at our election, on a one-for-one basis into shares of our common stock. LTIP units are not entitled to distributions prior to being earned based on achievement against the performance-based hurdles contained in these plans. Once earned, these LTIP units, whether vested or unvested, entitle the holder to receive distributions per unit from our operating partnership that are equivalent to the dividends paid per share on our common stock.
In addition to the LTIP units described above that we issued in lieu of shares of restricted stock, we also have issued another class of units of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership that are intended to be similar to stock options from an economic perspective, which we refer to as Class O LTIP units. Class O LTIP units are also intended to qualify as “profits interests” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. During 2021, we did not grant any Class O LTIP units.
Like stock options, Class O LTIP units operate in a manner that generally permits holders to realize the benefit of any increase in the per share value of our common stock above the value at the time the Class O LTIP units are granted. At the time of the grant of Class O LTIP units, the operating partnership establishes a conversion threshold, the vesting terms and the mandatory conversion date, if any, for the Class O LTIP units. The conversion threshold corresponds to the exercise price of a stock option while the mandatory conversion date corresponds to the expiration date of a stock option. Similar to the exercise price for stock options, the conversion threshold will equal the per unit value of the common units of our operating partnership on the grant date. Class O LTIP units will receive 10% distributions relating to periods between grant and vesting upon vesting, and will receive 10% distributions from vesting to their conversion as opposed to holders of non-qualified stock options who will not receive any distributions relating to periods between grant and exercise.
Once Class O LTIP units have vested, they may be converted into common units of our operating partnership by the holder at any time prior to their mandatory conversion date in a manner that is similar to a net exercise of stock options. Upon exercise of this conversion right, the Class O LTIP units will convert into a number of common units of the operating partnership that have an aggregate value equal to the aggregate spread of the Class O LTIP units that are converted. The “spread” for each
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 65 |
Class O LTIP unit will equal the excess, if any, of the value of our operating partnership’s assets per common unit on the conversion date above the per unit value at the time the Class O LTIP unit was granted (i.e., the conversion threshold). Any Class O LTIP units that have not been voluntarily converted prior to the mandatory conversion date established at the time the Class O LTIP units were granted will automatically convert into common units on such mandatory conversion date, or be forfeited if the value of our operating partnership’s assets per common unit is less than the conversion threshold for the Class O LTIP units.
LTIP units and Class O LTIP units are intended to offer executives substantially the same long-term incentive as shares of restricted stock and stock options, respectively, with more favorable U.S. federal income tax treatment available for “profits interests” under current federal income tax law. More specifically, one key disadvantage of restricted stock is that executives are generally taxed on the full market value of a grant at the time of vesting, even if they choose to hold the stock. Similarly, holders of non-qualified stock options are taxed upon exercise. Conversely, under current federal income tax law, an executive would generally not be subject to tax at the time of issuance or vesting of an LTIP unit or Class O LTIP unit or conversion into common units but only when he or she chooses to liquidate the common units into which his or her LTIP units.units or Class O LTIP units convert. Therefore, an executive who wishes to hold his or her equity awards for the long term can generally do so in a more tax-efficient manner with LTIP units or Class O LTIP units. In light of the trade-offs between increased tax efficiency, and incremental economic risk relating to the structure of the LTIP units as profits interests due to their only having value upon a book-up event as described above as compared to restricted stock, we chosehave chosen to use LTIP units and Class O LTIP units for grants to our 2014 Outperformance Plan.executives. We believe that the use of LTIP units in these plansand Class O LTIP units has (i) enhanced our equity-based compensation package overall, (ii) advanced the goal of promoting long-term equity ownership by executives, (iii) not adversely impacted dilution as compared to restricted stock, and (iv) further aligned the interests of our executives with the interests of our stockholders. We also believe that these benefits outweigh the loss
The Compensation Committee of the U.S. federal income tax business-expense deduction fromBoard of Directors of SL Green Realty Corp. has reviewed and discussed the issuanceCompensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of LTIP units, as comparedRegulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, our Compensation Committee recommended to restricted stock.the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this annual proxy statement and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
2016Proxy Statement37Submitted by our Compensation Committee
Lauren B. Dillard (Chair) | Edwin T. Burton, III | John S. Levy |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation paid to the individuals who served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer during our 20152021 fiscal year and eachtwo of our three most highly compensated executive officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2021, or collectively, the “named executive officers.”
Name And Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | Stock Awards(1)(2) ($) | Option Awards ($) | All Other Compensation(3) ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||
Marc Holliday | 2015 | $ | 1,050,000 | $ | 787,500 | $ | 2,008,125 | $ | 19,159,050 | — | $ | 43,074 | $ | 23,047,749 | |||||||||
Chief Executive | 2014 | $ | 1,050,000 | — | $ | 1,102,500 | $ | 14,160,346 | — | $ | 41,215 | $ | 16,354,061 | ||||||||||
Officer | 2013 | $ | 1,050,000 | $ | 1,100,000 | — | $ | 6,632,200 | $ | 3,849,590 | $ | 38,938 | $ | 12,670,728 | |||||||||
Stephen L. Green | 2015 | $ | 750,000 | $ | 468,750 | $ | 1,202,343 | $ | 3,962,493 | — | $ | 170,490 | $ | 6,554,076 | |||||||||
Chairman of the | 2014 | $ | 750,000 | — | — | $ | 4,468,371 | — | $ | 173,992 | $ | 5,392,363 | |||||||||||
Board | 2013 | $ | 750,000 | — | — | $ | 4,543,356 | — | $ | 148,389 | $ | 5,441,745 | |||||||||||
Andrew Mathias | 2015 | $ | 800,000 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 1,282,500 | $ | 13,436,852 | — | $ | 26,790 | $ | 16,046,132 | |||||||||
President | 2014 | $ | 800,000 | — | — | $ | 10,188,264 | — | $ | 7,800 | $ | 10,996,064 | |||||||||||
2013 | $ | 750,000 | — | — | $ | 5,370,869 | $ | 3,136,874 | $ | 28,863 | $ | 9,286,606 | |||||||||||
Matthew | 2015 | $ | 400,000 | $ | 1,400,000 | — | — | — | $ | 7,950 | $ | 1,807,950 | |||||||||||
DiLiberto | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Officer | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew S. Levine | 2015 | $ | 500,000 | — | — | $ | 873,342 | — | $ | 7,950 | $ | 1,381,292 | |||||||||||
Chief Legal Officer | 2014 | $ | 490,000 | — | — | $ | 2,033,308 | — | $ | 7,800 | $ | 2,531,108 | |||||||||||
and General | 2013 | $ | 475,000 | $ | 100,000 | — | $ | 3,264,228 | $ | 592,749 | $ | 7,650 | $ | 4,439,627 | |||||||||
Counsel |
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards(1) ($) | Option Awards(1) ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | All Other Compensation(2) ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Marc Holliday Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | 2021 | $ | 1,250,000 | — | $ | 18,099,677 | — | $ | 1,681,250 | $ | 57,130 | $ | 21,088,057 | |||||||||||||||||
2020 | $ | 1,250,000 | $ | 387,501 | $ | 12,643,310 | — | $ | 862,500 | $ | 51,415 | $ | 15,194,726 | |||||||||||||||||
2019 | $ | 1,250,000 | — | $ | 16,397,131 | — | $ | 3,293,070 | $ | 49,815 | $ | 20,990,016 | ||||||||||||||||||
Andrew Mathias President | 2021 | $ | 950,000 | — | $ | 14,929,026 | — | — | $ | 50,522 | $ | 15,929,548 | ||||||||||||||||||
2020 | $ | 950,000 | — | $ | 10,580,622 | — | — | $ | 43,136 | $ | 11,573,758 | |||||||||||||||||||
2019 | $ | 950,000 | — | $ | 11,191,600 | — | — | $ | 42,088 | $ | 12,183,688 | |||||||||||||||||||
Matthew J. DiLiberto Chief Financial Officer | 2021 | $ | 575,000 | $ | 925,000 | $ | 2,318,872 | — | — | $ | 11,600 | $ | 3,830,472 | |||||||||||||||||
2020 | $ | 550,000 | $ | 2,460,000 | (3) | $ | 1,336,498 | — | — | $ | 11,400 | $ | 4,357,898 | |||||||||||||||||
2019 | $ | 550,000 | $ | 1,650,000 | $ | 1,011,997 | — | — | $ | 11,200 | $ | 3,223,197 | ||||||||||||||||||
Andrew S. Levine Chief Legal Officer | 2021 | $ | 580,000 | — | $ | 2,783,700 | — | — | $ | 11,600 | $ | 3,375,300 | ||||||||||||||||||
2020 | $ | 580,000 | $ | 1,000,000 | (3) | $ | 2,701,565 | — | — | $ | 11,400 | $ | 4,292,965 | |||||||||||||||||
2019 | $ | 580,000 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 3,104,650 | — | — | $ | 11,200 | $ | 4,695,850 |
(1) | |
Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officer. Instead, the amounts shown are the full grant date fair value of stock awards and option awards issued to the executives in | |
Assuming that maximum performance is achieved under our | |
The table and footnotes below show the components of this column for | |
Name | All Other Compensation ($) | ||||||
Marc Holliday | |||||||
$ | |||||||
$ | 50,522(b) | ||||||
Matthew J. DiLiberto | $ | ||||||
Andrew S. Levine | $ | ||||||
Represents (i) the Company’s matching contributions with respect to amounts earned by the named executive officer under our 401(k) plan ($ |
38SL Green Realty Corp.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(b) | Represents (i) the Company’s matching contributions with respect to amounts earned by the named executive officer under our 401(k) plan ($11,600), (ii) car benefits, representing lease payments for a portion of the year for a leased car | |
(c) | Represents the Company’s matching contributions with respect to amounts earned by the named executive officer under our 401(k) plan ($ |
20152021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to each grant of an award made to a named executive officer in the fiscal year ended December31,2015.December 31, 2021.
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non- Equity Incentive Plan Award (#) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Award (#) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Approval Date | Threshold ($/#) | Target ($/#) | Maximum ($/#) | Threshold ($/#) | Target ($/#) | Maximum ($/#) | ||||||||||||||||
Marc Holliday | 01/12/2015 | 01/12/2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 45,832(1) | $ | 4,682,930 | |||||||||||||
01/12/2015 | 01/12/2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 87,870(2) | $ | 8,978,205 | ||||||||||||||
01/12/2015 | 01/12/2015 | — | — | — | 25,925(3) | 25,925(3) | 69,133(3) | — | $ | 4,884,667 | ||||||||||||||
01/18/2015 | 09/10/2013 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4,791(4) | $ | 613,248 | ||||||||||||||
N/A | N/A | $ | 787,500(7) | $ | 1,575,000(7) | $ | 2,362,500(7) | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Stephen L. Green | 01/01/2015 | 12/09/2009 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,233(5) | $ | 146,752 | |||||||||||||
01/12/2015 | 01/12/2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21,804(1) | $ | 2,227,846 | ||||||||||||||
01/12/2015 | 01/12/2015 | — | — | — | 8,427(3) | 8,427(3) | 22,473(3) | — | $ | 1,587,895 | ||||||||||||||
N/A | N/A | $ | 562,500(7) | $ | 984,375(7) | $ | 1,406,250(7) | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Andrew Mathias | 01/01/2015 | 11/08/2013 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,699(5) | $ | 440,255 | |||||||||||||
01/12/2015 | 01/12/2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 32,952(1) | $ | 3,366,904 | ||||||||||||||
01/12/2015 | 01/12/2015 | — | — | — | 58,667(6) | 58,667(6) | — | — | $ | 6,181,683 | ||||||||||||||
01/12/2015 | 01/12/2015 | — | — | — | 18,300(3) | 18,300(3) | 48,800(3) | — | $ | 3,448,000 | ||||||||||||||
N/A | N/A | $ | 600,000(7) | $ | 1,050,000(7) | $ | 1,500,000(7) | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Matthew DiLiberto | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Andrew S. Levine | 01/12/2015 | 01/12/2015 | — | — | — | 4,635(3) | 4,635(3) | 12,360(3) | — | $ | 873,342 | |||||||||||||
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Approval Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marc Holliday | 01/22/2021 | 01/22/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 141,983 | (1) | $ | 7,755,111 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/04/2021 | 02/04/2021 | — | — | — | 59,193 | (2) | 126,277 | (2) | 284,124 | (2) | — | $ | 9,026,551 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
12/13/2021 | 12/13/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23,002 | (3) | $ | 1,318,015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
N/A | N/A | $ | 625,000 | (4) | $ | 2,500,000 | (4) | $ | 3,750,000 | (4) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew Mathias | 01/22/2021 | 01/22/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 110,233 | (5) | $ | 6,020,926 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/04/2021 | 02/04/2021 | — | — | — | 47,355 | (2) | 101,023 | (2) | 227,300 | (2) | — | $ | 7,221,245 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
12/13/2021 | 12/13/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 29,439 | (3) | $ | 1,686,855 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
N/A | N/A | $ | 475,000 | (4) | $ | 1,662,500 | (4) | $ | 2,375,000 | (4) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew J. DiLiberto | 02/04/2021 | 02/04/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 31,020 | (6) | $ | 1,610,869 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/04/2021 | 02/04/2021 | — | — | — | 4,386 | (2) | 9,355 | (2) | 21,047 | (2) | — | $ | 708,003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew S. Levine | 01/22/2021 | 01/22/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23,572 | (7) | $ | 1,201,465 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/22/2021 | 01/22/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17,697 | (3) | $ | 874,232 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/04/2021 | 02/04/2021 | — | — | — | 4,386 | (2) | 9,355 | (2) | 21,047 | (2) | — | $ | 708,003 |
(1) | This grant of LTIP units was awarded in connection with Mr. Holliday’s employment agreement, with equal installments vesting on each of January 1, 2022, January 1, 2023 and January 1, 2024, subject to continued employment. |
(2) | Represents LTIP units granted as 2021 annual performance-based equity awards that were subject to performance-based vesting hurdles. The amount shown in the “Threshold” column of the table reflects the total number of LTIP units that would be earned at threshold performance with respect to both the operating performance metrics and the relative TSR metric, after giving effect to the maximum downward modifier. The amount shown in the “Maximum” column reflects the total number of LTIP units that would be earned at maximum performance with respect to both the operating performance metrics and the relative TSR metric, after giving effect to the maximum upward modifier. See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Our 2021 Executive Compensation Program” for a description of the terms of these performance-based awards and the Company’s estimated performance as of December 31, 2021. |
(3) | This grant of LTIP units vested immediately upon grant, but remains subject to a |
2016Proxy Statement39
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(4) | |
Represents cash payouts that were possible pursuant to the formulaic component of our annual cash bonus program for | |
(5) | This grant of LTIP units was awarded in connection with Mr. Mathias’s employment agreement, with equal installments vesting on each of January 1, 2022, January 1, 2023 and January 1, 2024, subject to continued employment. |
(6) | This grant of LTIP units was awarded in connection with Mr. DiLiberto’s employment agreement, with equal installments vesting on each of January 1, 2022 and January 1, 2023, subject to continued employment. |
(7) | This grant of LTIP units was awarded in connection with Mr. Levine’s employment agreement and vested on January 1, 2022. |
Grants of all equity awards were made pursuant to the2005Plan.the Fourth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. LTIP units that are only subject to time-based vesting based on continued employment through a specified date (and have not been forfeited) generally entitle executives to receive cash dividends, dividend equivalents or distributions whether or not then vested. LTIP units that are subject to performance-based vesting hurdles accrue cash dividends, dividend equivalents ordo not entitle the holder to receive distributions prior to the achievement of these hurdles,hurdles. If and such accrued amountswhen performance-based vesting occurs, the holders are only paidentitled to receive a combination of cash payments and distributions with respect to all LTIP units that are earned equal to the executivesamounts that would have been received if and when the earned LTIP units had been entitled to receive full distributions from the beginning of the applicable performance hurdles are met.period.
See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change-in-Control”Change in Control” below, for a discussion regarding potential acceleration of the equity awards and a description of the material terms of each named executive officer’s employment agreement.
68 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 20152021
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all outstanding equity awards held by each named executive officer at the fiscal year ended December31, 2015.December 31, 2021.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(#)(1) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares or Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested(2) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(#)(1) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares or Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marc Holliday | 66,666(5) | 33,334(5) | $ | 76.65 | 01/02/2018 | 9,778 | $ | 1,104,718 | — | — | 100,000 | $ | 76.65 | 01/02/2023 | 326,832 | $ | 24,149,616 | 266,058 | $ | 19,659,044 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
66,666(5) | 33,334(5) | $ | 76.65 | 01/02/2023 | — | — | 30,913(3)(4) | $ | 3,492,551 | 52,500 | — | $ | 99.86 | 06/17/2026 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen L. Green | — | — | — | — | 2,201 | $ | 248,669 | 10,628(3)(4) | $ | 1,200,751 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52,500 | — | $ | 105.73 | 06/17/2022 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
52,500 | — | $ | 105.73 | 06/17/2027 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew Mathias | 43,333(6) | 21,667(6) | $ | 91.43 | 11/08/2018 | 3,779 | $ | 426,951 | — | — | 65,000 | — | $ | 91.43 | 11/08/2023 | 257,383 | $ | 19,018,030 | 206,477 | $ | 15,256,549 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
43,333(6) | 21,667(6) | $ | 91.43 | 11/08/2023 | — | — | 22,081(3)(4) | $ | 2,494,711 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew DiLiberto | 10,000 | 20,000 | $ | 90.15 | 12/12/2018 | 13,646 | $ | 1,541,725 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew J. DiLiberto | 15,000 | (4) | — | $ | 106.05 | 01/11/2022 | 45,510 | $ | 3,362,734 | 19,709 | $ | 1,456,261 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | — | 14,269(3)(4) | $ | 1,612,112 | 15,000 | (4) | — | $ | 106.05 | 01/11/2027 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew S. Levine | 4,166(7) | 8,334(7) | $ | 90.15 | 12/12/2018 | 14,925 | $ | 1,686,227 | — | — | 12,500 | — | $ | 90.15 | 12/12/2023 | 50,508 | $ | 3,732,036 | 19,709 | $ | 1,456,261 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4,166(7) | 8,334(7) | $ | 90.15 | 12/12/2023 | — | — | 5,561(3)(4) | $ | 628,282 | 15,000 | (4) | — | $ | 106.05 | 01/11/2022 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15,000 | (4) | — | $ | 106.05 | 01/11/2027 | — | — | — | — |
40SL Green Realty Corp.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(1) For each of our named executive officers, includes the following:
Executive | Notional Stock Units(a) | LTIP Units(b) | Performance- Based Employment Agreement LTIP Units(c) | Time-Based Employment Agreement LTIP Units(d) | ||||
Marc Holliday | 4,791 | 4,987 | — | — | ||||
Stephen L. Green | — | 2,201 | — | — | ||||
Andrew Mathias | — | 3,779 | — | — | ||||
Matthew DiLiberto | — | 646 | — | 13,000 | ||||
Andrew S. Levine | — | 925 | 7,000 | 7,000 |
(1) | For each of our named executive officers, includes the following: |
Executive | 2021 Operational Performance- Based LTIP Units(a) | 2020 Operational Performance- Based LTIP Units(b) | 2019 Performance- Based LTIP Units(c) | 2021 Time-Based Employment Agreement LTIP Units | 2020 Time-Based Employment Agreement LTIP Units | 2019 Time-Based Employment Agreement LTIP Units | ||||||
Marc Holliday | 110,492 | 41,494 | — | 141,983(d) | 32,863(g) | — | ||||||
Andrew Mathias | 88,394 | 33,196 | — | 110,233(d) | 25,560(g) | — | ||||||
Matthew J. DiLiberto | 8,185 | 3,074 | 3,231 | 31,020(e) | — | — | ||||||
Andrew S. Levine | 8,185 | 3,074 | 3,231 | 23,572(f) | 7,120(f) | 5,326(f) |
(a) | Represents | |
(b) | Represents the | |
(c) | Represents the sum of | |
Represents LTIP units that vested one-third on January 1, 2022 and LTIP units that are scheduled to vest one-third on | ||
(e) |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 69 |
(f) | Represents LTIP units that vested on | |
(g) |
(2) | Based on a price of |
(3) | |
2021 Performance- Based | 2020 Performance- Based LTIP | |||
Executive | LTIP Units(a) | Units(b) | ||
Marc Holliday | 173,631 | 92,427 | ||
Andrew Mathias | 138,906 | 67,571 | ||
Matthew J. DiLiberto | 12,863 | 6,846 | ||
Andrew S. Levine | 12,863 | 6,846 |
(a) | Represents the |
(b) | Represents the sum of the LTIP units that would be earned if (i) the “threshold” performance goal was |
(4) | Reflects awards of Class O LTIP units. The conversion threshold for the Class O LTIP units, which is equivalent to the exercise price for a stock option, was determined by reference to the fair market value under our Fourth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of one share of our common stock on each applicable grant date. See “—Other Compensation Policies and Information—Other Matters— LTIP units and Class O LTIP units” for a description of Class O LTIP units. |
2016Proxy Statement 41
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
20152021 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
None of our named executive officers exercised any stock options during 2015. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the exercise of stock options and the vesting of stock, including restricted stock, restricted stock units, LTIP units and similar instruments for each named executive officer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2021.
Stock Awards | Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting(1)($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting(1) ($) | ||||||||
Marc Holliday | 302,112 | $ | 35,672,524 | — | — | 126,686 | $ | 8,916,215 | ||||||
Stephen L. Green | 100,193 | $ | 11,434,062 | |||||||||||
Andrew Mathias | 228,021 | $ | 25,892,788 | — | — | 112,020 | $ | 7,917,861 | ||||||
Matthew DiLiberto | 27,443 | $ | 3,051,153 | |||||||||||
Matthew J. DiLiberto | — | — | 12,211 | $ | 766,703 | |||||||||
Andrew S. Levine | 45,006 | $ | 5,073,496 | — | — | 33,374 | $ | 2,085,464 |
Amounts reflect the market value of the stock on the |
70 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
2021 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following table sets forth certain information regarding non-tax qualified compensation deferred during the year ended December 31, 2021. All of the information below relates to notional stock units that we granted to certain of our named executive officers pursuant to employment agreements we had entered into with them. Pursuant to these employment agreements, we agreed to grant notional stock units with a specified value to certain of our named executive officers each year, which are subject to vesting based on continued employment for the following year. Once vested, these notional stock units represent a contingent right to receive the value of one share of our common stock. Under the terms of the deferred compensation agreements, each participant is also entitled to dividend equivalent rights, to be paid in cash on a current basis, equal to the amount per share of any cash dividend we declare, multiplied by the total number of notional units held by such participant as of the record date for such dividend. Vested notional stock units are settled in cash no later than 30 days following the earliest of (i) the executive’s death, (ii) the date of the executive’s separation from service with us and (iii) the effective date of a change in control.
Under the employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers that were in effect during 2021 and the new employment agreements entered into in December 2021 that became effective in 2022, we have eliminated nonqualified deferred compensation.
Executive | Executive Contributions in Last FY ($) | Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($) | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)(1)(2) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)(3) | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)(1)(4) | ||||||||
Marc Holliday | — | — | $ | 995,275 | $ | 223,301 | $ | 4,537,880 | |||||
Andrew Mathias | — | — | $ | 620,252 | $ | 139,161 | $ | 2,827,992 | |||||
Matthew J. DiLiberto | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Andrew S. Levine | — | — | — | — | — |
(1) | Awards of notional units constitute “Stock Awards” for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table, and, as a result, the full grant date fair value of these awards computed in accordance with ASC 718, as of the grant date of such awards, are included in the “Stock Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table for the year in which they were granted. The right to receive dividend equivalents was factored into the determination of the grant date fair value, which means that the value of the dividend equivalents included in “Aggregate Earnings in Last FY” was effectively already included in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(2) | The amounts in this column represent the increase or decrease in value of vested notional units from December 31, 2020 through December 31, 2021, as calculated based on the closing stock price on the NYSE of one share of our common stock on December 31, 2020 compared to the closing stock price on the NYSE of one share of our common stock on December 31, 2021, plus the aggregate value of dividend equivalent rights paid with respect to all vested and unvested notional units held by each executive during 2021. |
(3) | Represents the aggregate value of dividend equivalent rights paid with respect to all vested and unvested notional units held by each executive during 2021. |
(4) | Based on a per share price of $73.89, which was the closing stock price on the NYSE of one share of our common stock on December 31, 2021. |
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-ControlChange in Control
We have contractual arrangements with our named executive officers that provide for payments, acceleration of vesting or other benefits to our named executive officers upon a termination of employment in certain circumstances or upon a change in control. These include our employment agreements with our named executive officers, and the terms of our2014Outperformance Plan, our performance-based equity awards and our stock options. The following are certain key aspects of these contractual arrangements:
| |
| |
| |
|
options and Class O LTIP Units. The discussion below describes these contractual arrangements in greater detail.
Employment Agreements
We haveDuring 2021, we had employment agreements with all of our named executive officers. All of the employment agreements with our named executive officers provideprovided for, among other things, severance payments and benefits and acceleration of equity awards in connection with the termination of employment in certain circumstances. In return, each of our named executive officers has agreed to non-compete, non-solicitation, non-interference and confidentiality provisions. The table below summarizes the material terms of our employment agreements with our named executive officers.officers, as in effect during 2021, which are identical to the terms of each executive’s current employment agreement.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 71 |
Marc Holliday | Andrew Mathias | Matthew J. DiLiberto | Andrew S. Levine | |||||||||
Term(1) | 1/18/22 – 1/17/25 | 1/1/22 – 12/31/23 | 1/1/21 – 1/1/23 | 1/1/22 – 1/1/25 | ||||||||
Annual Salary | $1.25M | $950K | $575K | $580K | ||||||||
None | None | |||||||||||
$6.0M (Target)(3) | None | None | ||||||||||
$3.5M (Target)(4) | 31,020(5) | $1.3M (Target)(4) | ||||||||||
Other Benefits | $10M of life | |||||||||||
insurance | None | None | None | |||||||||
Severance Benefits without Change-in- Control (“CiC”) and |
42SL Green Realty Corp.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
| If the executive’s employment is terminated by us without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason during the term, the executive will be entitled to the following payments or benefits, subject |
release. | ||||||||
● 2.0x / 1.5x the sum of base salary, maximum formulaic bonus and target value of annual time-based equity award (if CiC: 3.0x / 2.5x the sum of base salary, average annual bonus for prior two years and target value of annual time-based award) ● Pro-rata bonus and pro-rata portion of target value of annual time-based award for partial year ● Acceleration of all unvested time-based equity awards ● Class O LTIP unit/option exercise period extended to second January 1st following termination ● 24 (36 if CiC) / 18 (30 if CiC) months of benefit continuation payments | ● 1x ●Pro-rata bonus for partial year (if termination prior to June 30, otherwise full amount of average annual bonus) ● Acceleration of all unvested equity awards (other than● ●12 (24 if CiC) months of benefit | ● ● The target value of the annual time-based equity awards to be granted in January 2023 and 2024, to the extent not yet granted ● Pro-rata bonus for partial year● Acceleration of all unvested time-based equity awards● ● 12 (24 if CiC) months of benefit |
SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Marc Holliday | Andrew Mathias | Matthew J. DiLiberto | Andrew S. Levine | |||||
Death / (Disability)(6) | If the executive’s employment is terminated by us upon death or disability during the term, the executive will be entitled to all of the following payments or benefits, |
● | ||||
● Pro-rata bonus for partial year● Pro-rated target value of the annual time-based equity awards ● Acceleration of all unvested equity awards (other than performance-based awards) ● Class O LTIP unit/option exercise period extended to second January 1st following termination ● Payments/benefits to Mr. Holliday are reduced by life insurance benefit ● (If Disability: 36 months of benefit continuation/ payments) | ● (If Disability: 1x current annual base salary and bonus) ● Pro-rata bonus for partial year (if termination prior to June 30, otherwise full amount of average annual bonus)(8) ●Partial acceleration of unvested equity awards (other than ● | ●(If Disability: 1x the sum of base salary and average annual ● Pro-rata bonus for partial year● ● Acceleration of all unvested equity awards (other than ● Class O LTIP unit/ option exercise period extended to second January 1st following termination ● |
Post-Change-in-Control |
| |||||||
● Pro-rata bonus based on average annual bonus for prior two years and pro-rata portion of target value of annual time-based award for partial year prior to Change-in-Control ● Annual cash salary | ● Annual cash salary equal to the sum of the annual base salary in effect prior to the Change-in-Control plus | ● Pro-rata bonus for partial year prior to Change-in-Control based on average annual bonus for prior two years ● Annual cash salary equal to the sum of prior base salary, prior year cash bonus and, beginning in the year following the most recent grant of a time- based equity award, target value of annual time-based equity awards |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 73 |
Marc Holliday | Andrew Mathias | Matthew J. DiLiberto | Andrew S. Levine | |||||
Restrictive Covenants | The executive agreed to the following covenants: | |||||||
Noncompetition with us for | Noncompetition with us for |
(1) | The terms automatically renew for |
2016 Proxy Statement 43
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(2) | |
(3) | Each of Messrs. Holliday and Mathias are entitled to receive annual awards of performance-based LTIP units with the target values set forth in the table above. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Our 2021 Executive Compensation Program” for details regarding the structure of these awards for 2021. A summary of the terms applicable to these awards in connection with a termination of the executive’s employment is set forth below. |
(4) | |
(5) | See “Executive Compensation Tables – Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2021.” |
(6) | Performance-based equity awards will be treated in accordance with their terms. See table below for relevant terms to be included in performance-based LTIP units granted pursuant to the employment agreements. |
(7) | Calculated based on the sum of |
(8) | Bonus is for the year in which employment is terminated (and a bonus for the prior year if such bonus had not yet been determined), subject to proration for the bonus payable for the year in which termination occurs if such termination occurs on or before June 30, based on average annual cash bonus |
In the event that any payment or benefit constitutes an excess “parachute payment” under Section 280G of the IRC subject to an excise tax, the executive will not be entitled to a tax gross-up payment; however, the executive’s payments and benefits would be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid such excise taxes, but only if such a reduction of pay or benefits would result in a greater after-tax benefit to the executive. | |
(10) | Full acceleration of vesting of any unvested equity awards granted in lieu of cash bonuses and |
The terms Cause, Good Reason and Change-in-Control, as used above, are specifically defined in each executive’s employment agreement. For Messrs. Holliday and Mathias, the term Cause is defined to include a non-renewal of the term of the employment agreement, provided that the cash severance multiple in such instance would be 1.0x instead of 2.0x for Mr. Holliday and 1.5x for Mr. Mathias. The summary above is qualified in its entirety by reference to the copies of the employment agreements and the deferred compensation agreements with our named executive officers, which have been previously filed by us with the SEC, as referenced in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2021, and are incorporated herein by reference.
Outperformance PlanTable of Contents
74 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Performance-Based Equity Awards
The impacttable below summarizes the treatment of our annual performance-based equity awards, including those granted in 2020 and 2021 that were outstanding at December 31, 2021 (the “Annual Performance-Based Awards”), in connection with a change-in-control orand various hypothetical termination of employment ofscenarios for our named executive officers on the awards granted under our 2014 Outperformance Plan are described above under “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Our Executive Compensation Programs—Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards—Outperformance Plans—2014 Outperformance Plan.”officers.
Annual Performance-Based Awards |
Change-in-Control (“CiC”) | Change-in-Control & Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason(1) | Death/Disability & Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason(1) | ||||
Holliday / Mathias Awards | ● If one-year performance period ends early, Operational Component deemed achieved at target, subject to Absolute TSR modifier ● Relative Component determined as of date of CiC ● Earned awards remain subject to time-based vesting | ● If one-year performance period ends early, Operational Component deemed achieved at maximum (200%), subject to Absolute TSR modifier ● Relative Component determined as of date of CiC ● Earned awards vest in full | ● Performance calculated as of end of performance period ● Earned awards fully vested | |||
DiLiberto / Levine Awards | ● If one-year performance period ends early, Operational Component deemed achieved at target, subject to Absolute TSR modifier ● Relative Component determined as of date of CiC ● Earned awards remain subject to time-based vesting | ● If one-year performance period ends early, Operational Component deemed achieved at target, subject to Absolute TSR modifier ● Relative Component determined as of date of CiC ● Earned awards vest in full | ● Performance calculated as of end of performance period ● Earned awards fully vest, subject to proration such that no units vest if termination occurs during the first year, one-third vest if the termination occurs during the second year and two-thirds will vest if the termination occurs during the third year |
(1) | Accelerated vesting under the Annual Performance-Based Awards is generally subject to the effectiveness of a mutual release, except in upon a termination as a result of death or in connection with or within 18 months after a change in control. |
Performance-Based Equity Awards
Upon a change-in-control, the performance-based vesting criteria for the performance-based LTIP unit awards that we granted to our named executive officers pursuant to their employment agreements or that we granted in 2014 in recognition of our strong stock price performance during the three-year performance period under our 2011 Outperformance Plan will be determined based on performance through the date of the change-in-control (except for the portion of the performance-based LTIP unit awards that were to be granted as time-based LTIP unit awards to Messrs. Holliday and Mathias prior to the amendments to their then current employment agreements in 2014, for which the performance-based vesting criteria will be deemed to have been met in the event of a change-in-control). Regardless of the satisfaction of the performance-based vesting criteria, these awards will remain subject to vesting based on continued employment through the originally established vesting dates. In the event of a termination by us without Cause or by an executive for Good Reason (as defined in each executive’s employment agreement) in connection with or within 18 months after a change-in-control, all of the performance-based LTIP units will vest. Otherwise, the vesting of these performance-based LTIP units upon a termination of employment will be treated in the same manner as other equity awards under our executive’s employment agreements.
Stock Options
Under the general terms of the2005Plan, the vesting of stock options granted thereunder, including those granted to our named executive officers, will fully accelerate in the event of a termination of the recipient’s employment upon death or disability. Vested stock options generally may be exercised until the earlier of (i) their stated expiration date or (ii) subject to extension of the exercise period pursuant to our named executive officers’ employment agreements, a specified period of time after termination of employment (i.e., upon termination in the event of termination for cause, one year after termination in the event of termination due to death or disability and three months after termination in all other cases).
44SL Green Realty Corp.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Hypothetical Illustration of Payments upon Termination or Change-in-ControlChange in Control
The following tables show the potential payments and estimated value of the benefits that our named executive officers would have been entitled to receive upon a termination of their employment by us without cause or by them for good reason or upon the death or disability as of December 31, 2015 based on the employment agreements and other contractual arrangements in effect as of that date.2021. Our named executive officers would not have been entitled to any payments or benefits other than those already accrued in the event of a termination of their employment by us for cause or by them without good reason (including upon retirement) or a change-in-control without termination.. The types of events constituting cause, good reason, disability and a change-in-controlchange in control may differ in some respects among the different arrangements providing for benefits to the named executive officers; however, for consistency in presentation, the payments and estimated value of benefits have been grouped together based on these concepts without regard for any such differences.
Marc Holliday | ||||||||||||
Payment/Benefit | Termination without Cause or for Good Reason | Termination w/Change-in-Control | Disability | Death(1) | ||||||||
Pro-Rata Bonus | $ | 8,615,000 | $ | 8,615,000 | $ | 8,615,000 | $ | 8,615,000 | ||||
Cash Severance | $ | 10,240,000 | $ | 30,720,000 | $ | 10,240,000 | — | |||||
Stock Option Vesting(2) | $ | 2,422,048 | $ | 2,422,048 | $ | 2,422,048 | $ | 2,422,048 | ||||
LTIP Unit/Stock Unit Vesting(3) | $ | 11,595,778 | $ | 11,595,778 | $ | 11,595,778 | $ | 11,595,778 | ||||
2014 OPP(4) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Benefits Continuation(5) | $ | 31,965 | $ | 63,930 | $ | 95,895 | — | |||||
Stephen L. Green | ||||||||||||
Payment/Benefit | Termination without Cause or for Good Reason | Termination w/Change-in-Control | Disability | Death(1) | ||||||||
Pro-Rata Bonus | $ | 4,750,000 | $ | 4,750,000 | $ | 4,750,000 | $ | 4,750,000 | ||||
Cash Severance | $ | 5,650,000 | $ | 16,950,000 | $ | 5,650,000 | — | |||||
Stock Option Vesting(2) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
LTIP Unit/Stock Unit Vesting(3) | $ | 497,338 | $ | 497,338 | $ | 497,338 | $ | 497,338 | ||||
2014 OPP(4) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Benefits Continuation(5) | $ | 31,302 | $ | 62,604 | $ | 93,906 | — | |||||
Andrew Mathias | ||||||||||||
Payment/Benefit | Termination without Cause or for Good Reason | Termination w/Change-in-Control | Disability | Death(1) | ||||||||
Pro-Rata Bonus | $ | 6,225,000 | $ | 6,225,000 | $ | 6,225,000 | $ | 6,225,000 | ||||
Cash Severance | $ | 7,450,000 | $ | 18,625,000 | $ | 7,450,000 | — | |||||
Stock Option Vesting(2) | $ | 933,848 | $ | 933,848 | $ | 933,848 | $ | 933,848 | ||||
LTIP Unit/Stock Unit Vesting(3) | $ | 7,482,364 | $ | 7,482,364 | $ | 7,482,364 | $ | 7,482,364 | ||||
2014 OPP(4) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Benefits Continuation(5) | $ | 31,965 | 63,930 | 95,895 | — | |||||||
Matthew DiLiberto | ||||||||||||
Payment/Benefit | Termination without Cause or for Good Reason | Termination w/Change-in-Control | Disability | Death(1) | ||||||||
Pro-Rata Bonus | $ | 1,337,500 | $ | 1,337,500 | $ | 1,337,500 | $ | 1,337,500 | ||||
Cash Severance | $ | 1,707,500 | $ | 3,415,000 | $ | 1,707,500 | — | |||||
Stock Option Vesting(2) | $ | 456,600 | $ | 456,600 | $ | 228,300 | $ | 228,300 | ||||
LTIP Unit/Stock Unit Vesting(3) | $ | 2,405,796 | $ | 2,405,796 | $ | 750,865 | $ | 750,865 | ||||
2014 OPP(4) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Benefits Continuation(5) | $ | 31,173 | $ | 63,346 | $ | 93,519 | — | |||||
Andrew S. Levine | ||||||||||||
Payment/Benefit | Termination without Cause or for Good Reason | Termination w/Change-in-Control | Disability | Death(1) | ||||||||
Pro-Rata Bonus | $ | 1,137,500 | $ | 1,137,500 | $ | 1,137,500 | $ | 1,137,500 | ||||
Cash Severance | $ | 1,632,500 | $ | 3,265,000 | $ | 1,632,500 | — | |||||
Stock Option Vesting(2) | $ | 380,530 | $ | 380,530 | $ | 190,265 | $ | 190,265 | ||||
LTIP Unit/Stock Unit Vesting(3) | $ | 1,790,846 | $ | 1,790,846 | $ | 1,686,227 | $ | 1,686,227 | ||||
2014 OPP(4) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Benefits Continuation(5) | $ | 31,965 | $ | 63,930 | $ | 95,895 | — |
2016Proxy Statement 45 The potential payments and estimated values set forth below are based on the terms of the employment agreements in effect as of December 31, 2021.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 75 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Marc Holliday | ||||||||||||
Payment/Benefit | Termination without Cause or for Good Reason | Termination w/ Change in Control | Disability | Death(1) | ||||||||
Pro-Rata Bonus | $ | 6,577,785 | $ | 6,577,785 | $ | 6,577,785 | $ | 6,577,785 | ||||
Cash Severance | $ | 19,000,000 | $ | 28,500,000 | $ | 9,500,000 | — | |||||
Stock Option / Class O LTIP Unit Vesting(2) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
LTIP Unit/Stock Unit Vesting(3) | $ | 25,315,970 | $ | 40,820,161 | $ | 25,315,970 | $ | 25,315,970 | ||||
Benefits Continuation(4) | $ | 161,496 | $ | 242,245 | $ | 242,245 | — | |||||
Andrew Mathias | ||||||||||||
Payment/Benefit | Termination without Cause or for Good Reason | Termination w/ Change in Control | Disability | Death | ||||||||
Pro-Rata Bonus | $ | 4,843,479 | $ | 4,843,479 | $ | 4,843,479 | $ | 4,843,479 | ||||
Cash Severance | $ | 10,237,500 | $ | 17,062,500 | $ | 6,825,000 | — | |||||
Stock Option / Class O LTIP Unit Vesting(2) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
LTIP Unit/Stock Unit Vesting(3) | $ | 19,951,113 | $ | 32,354,618 | $ | 19,951,113 | $ | 19,951,113 | ||||
Benefits Continuation(4) | $ | 90,288 | $ | 150,479 | $ | 180,575 | — | |||||
Matthew J. DiLiberto | ||||||||||||
Payment/Benefit | Termination without Cause or for Good Reason | Termination w/ Change in Control | Disability | Death | ||||||||
Pro-Rata Bonus | $ | 1,836,667 | $ | 1,836,667 | $ | 1,836,667 | $ | 1,836,667 | ||||
Cash Severance | $ | 2,411,667 | $ | 4,823,334 | $ | 2,411,667 | — | |||||
Stock Option / Class O LTIP Unit Vesting(2) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
LTIP Unit/Stock Unit Vesting(3) | $ | 2,606,519 | $ | 4,824,795 | $ | 1,460,485 | $ | 1,460,485 | ||||
Benefits Continuation(4) | $ | 45,307 | $ | 90,613 | $ | 135,920 | — | |||||
Andrew S. Levine | ||||||||||||
Payment/Benefit | Termination without Cause or for Good Reason | Termination w/ Change in Control | Disability | Death | ||||||||
Pro-Rata Bonus | $ | 1,125,000 | $ | 1,125,000 | $ | 1,125,000 | $ | 1,125,000 | ||||
Cash Severance | $ | 1,755,000 | $ | 3,510,000 | $ | 1,755,000 | — | |||||
Stock Option / Class O LTIP Unit Vesting(2) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
LTIP Unit/Stock Unit Vesting(3) | $ | 2,975,821 | $ | 4,966,960 | $ | 2,975,821 | $ | 2,975,821 | ||||
Benefits Continuation(4) | $ | 45,434 | $ | 90,868 | $ | 136,601 | — |
(1) | As we maintained life insurance policies for the benefit of the beneficiaries of |
(2) | Represents the value of the stock options or Class O LTIP units, if any, that would vest. Assumes that the per share value of the stock options or Class O LTIP units that vest equals (i) |
(3) | Represents the value of the LTIP units, |
76 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
and 2021 subject to operational performance hurdles, (ii) earned a portion of the performance-based LTIP units granted in 2020 subject to relative TSR performance and (iii) earned a portion of the LTIP units granted in 2021 subject to relative TSR performance hurdles. See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis —Other Compensation Policies and Information —Outstanding Annual Equity Award Performance Summary (2019-2021).”
Benefits continuation amounts are based on the actual expense for financial reporting purposes for the year ended December 31, |
In the event a change in control had occurred on December 31, 2021 without the termination of the employment of our named executive officers, Messrs. Holliday, Mathias and Levine would have been entitled to the pro-rata bonus payments set forth in the table above. In addition, TSR performance would have been measured pursuant to the Annual Performance-Based Awards, which would have resulted in all of the awards granted in 2020 subject to the absolute TSR modifier being forfeited and a portion of the awards granted in 2020 and 2021 subject to relative TSR also being forfeited. A portion of the performance-based LTIP units granted in 2020 and 2021 subject to the absolute TSR modifier and relative TSR performance would have been earned and would have remained subject to vesting based on continued employment, as described above. The number of LTIP units earned in such event for each of our named executive officers is as follows: Mr. Holliday – 196,760; Mr. Mathias – 157,410; Mr. DiLiberto – 14,576; and Mr. Levine – 14,576. Upon earning these additional LTIP units, each of our named executive officers would have been entitled to cash payments and distributions with respect to the following number of such LTIP units equal to (i) $7.7937 per unit granted in 2020: Mr. Holliday – 59,806; Mr. Mathias – 47,844; Mr. DiLiberto – 4,429; and Mr. Levine – 4,429 and (ii) $3.6471 per unit granted in 2021: Mr. Holliday – 136,954; Mr. Mathias – 109,566; Mr. DiLiberto – 10,147; and Mr. Levine – 10,147. In each case, these amounts equal the amounts that would have been received if such LTIP units had been entitled to receive full distributions from the beginning of the applicable performance period.
The amounts described above do not include payments and benefits to the extent they have been earned prior to the termination of employment or change-in-controlchange in control or are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees upon termination of employment. These include: accrued salary and vacation pay; earned and accrued, but unpaid, bonuses; distribution of plan balances under our 401(k) plan; life insurance proceeds in the event of death; and disability insurance payouts in the event of disability. All of the cash severance payments described below are to be made as lump sum payments at the time of termination; provided that, to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A of the IRC, the payments are to be delayed until six months after termination, during which time the payments will accrue interest at the rate of 5% per annum. As a result of provisions in the named executive officers’ employment agreements, in the event that any payment or benefit to be paid or provided to an executive set forth above would have been subject to the excise tax under Sections 280G of the IRC, the payments and benefits to such executive would have been reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of such excise tax, but only if such reduction would result in a greater after-tax benefit to the executive. The amounts set forth in the table above have not been adjusted to reflect any such reduction that might be applicable.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Our Compensation Committee is comprised ofLauren B. Dillard (Chair), John H. Alschuler, Edwin ThomasT. Burton, III and John S. Levy.Levy each served on the Compensation Committee during 2021. There are no Compensation Committee interlocks and none of our employees is a member of our Compensation Committee.
46Pay Ratio Disclosure RuleSL Green Realty Corp.
Pursuant to a mandate of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the SEC adopted a rule requiring annual disclosure of the ratio of the median employee’s annual total compensation to the total annual compensation of the principal executive officer, or PEO. The PEO of our Company is Mr. Holliday.
For 2021, the annual total compensation of Mr. Holliday, our PEO, of $21,088,057, as shown in the Summary Compensation Table above, was approximately 304 times the annual total compensation of $69,449 of a median employee calculated in the same manner. We identified the median employee using the annual base salary and target annual cash incentive compensation, as of December 31, 2021, plus any long-term equity incentive awards granted in 2021 for all individuals (excluding our PEO) who were employed by us on December 31, 2021, the last day of our payroll year, whether employed on a full-time or part-time basis.
As of December 31, 2021, 597 of our 931 employees were hourly-paid employees involved in building operations, all of whom are subject to collective bargaining agreements. If these employees were not included for purposes of identifying our median employee, the annual total compensation of a median employee would be $125,475 and the annual total compensation of our PEO would be approximately 168 times such amount.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION77
Equity Compensation Plan Table
The following table summarizes information, as of December31,2015, relating to our equity compensation plans pursuant to which shares of our common stock or other equity securities may be granted from time to time.
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | ||||||||
Plan category | (a) | (b) | (c) | |||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | 4,236,030 | (2) | $ | 89.85 | (3) | 535,534 | (4) | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | |||||||
Total | 4,236,030 | $ | 89.85 | 535,534 |
| |
| |
| |
|
2016Proxy Statement47
|
The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. Stockholder ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP is not required by law, the NYSE or the Company’s organizational documents. However, as a matter of good corporate governance, the Board has elected to submit the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to the stockholders for ratification at the 2016 annual meeting. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. If our stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, the Audit Committee will take that fact into consideration, together with such other factors it deems relevant, in determining its next selection of an independent registered public accounting firm. Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since our formation in June 1997 and is considered by our management to be well-qualified. Ernst & Young LLP has advised us that neither it nor any member thereof has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in the Company or any of our subsidiaries in any capacity.AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
A representative of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the annual meeting, will be given the opportunity to make a statement at the annual meeting if he or she so desires and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
A majority of all of the votes cast with respect to this proposal is required for the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. Abstentions do not constitute a vote “for” or “against” and will not be counted as “votes cast”. Therefore, abstentions will have no effect on this proposal.
|
The following report of the Audit Committee of the Board will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any previous or future documents filed by us with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this report by reference in any such document.
Our Audit Committee oversees our financial reporting process on behalf of the Board, in accordance with our Audit Committee Charter. Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, internal controls, and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws and regulations. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, our Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152021 filed by the Company with management.
Our Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under Auditing Standard No.16, “Communications with Audit Committees,” as adopted by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.Board and the SEC. Our Audit Committee received from Ernst & Young LLP the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, our Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152021 filed by the Company.
48SL Green Realty Corp.
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS
The members of our Audit Committee are not engaged professionally in the practice of auditing or accounting. Committee members rely, without independent investigation or verification, on the information provided to them and on the representations made by management and our independent registered public accounting firm. Accordingly, our Audit Committee’s oversight does not provide an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, our Audit Committee’s considerations and discussions referred to above do not assure that the audit of our financial statements has been carried out in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, that the financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. or that our registered public accounting firm is in fact “independent.”independent.
Submitted by our Audit CommitteeEdwin Thomas Burton, III (Chairman)Betsy AtkinsCraig M. HatkoffJohn S. Levy
Betsy S. Atkins | Lauren B. Dillard | Craig M. Hatkoff |
78 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Audit Fees
Fees, including out-of-pocket expenses, for audit services totaled approximately $4,031,963 in fiscal year 2015 and $3,441,222 in fiscal year 2014. Audit fees include fees associated with our annual audits and related reviews of our annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. In addition, audit fees include Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 planning and testing, fees for public filings in connection with various property acquisitions, joint venture audits, and services relating to public filings in connection with our preferred and common stock and debt offerings and certain other transactions. Our joint venture partners paid their pro rata share of any joint venture audit fees. Audit fees also include fees for accounting research and consultations.
Audit-Related Fees
Fees for audit-related services totaled approximately $54,255 in 2015 and $77,500 in 2014. The audit-related services principally include fees for operating expense audits and agreed-upon procedures projects.
Tax Fees
No fees were incurred for tax services, including tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning in either2015or2014.
All Other Fees
There were no fees for other services not included above in either2015or2014.
Our Audit Committee considers whether the provision by Ernst & Young LLP of any services that would be required to be described under “All Other Fees” would be compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLP’s independence from both management and the Company.
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS | 79 |
PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF OUR AUDIT COMMITTEE
Our Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit services and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, except for any de minimis non-audit services. Non-audit services are considered de minimis if: (1) the aggregate amount of all such non-audit services constitutes less than five percent of the total amount of revenues we paid to our independent registered public accounting firm during the fiscal year in which they are provided; (2) we did not recognize such services at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and (3) such services are promptly brought to our Audit Committee’s or any of its members’ attention and approved by our Audit Committee or any of its members who has authority to give such approval prior to the completion of the audit. None of the fees reflected abovebelow were incurred as a result of non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to this de minimis exception. All services provided by Ernst & Young LLP in 20152021 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee may delegate to one or more of its members who is an independent director the authority to grant pre-approvals.
2016Proxy StatementFEE DISCLOSURE
2021 ($) | 2020 ($) | |||
Audit Fees | 3,272,000 | 3,364,000 | ||
Audit-Related Fees | 89,000 | 71,000 | ||
Tax Fees | — | — | ||
All Other Fees | — | — | ||
TOTAL | 3,361,000 | 3,435,000 |
49Audit Fees
Fees, including out-of-pocket expenses, for audit services totaled approximately $3,272,000 in fiscal year 2021 and $3,364,000 in fiscal year 2020. Audit fees include fees associated with our annual audits and related reviews of our annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. In addition, audit fees include Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 planning and testing, fees for joint venture audits, and services relating to public filings in connection with our preferred and common stock and debt offerings and certain other transactions. Our joint venture partners paid their pro rata share of any joint venture audit fees. Audit fees also include fees for accounting research and consultations.
Audit-Related Fees
Fees for audit-related services totaled approximately $89,000 in 2021 and $71,000 in 2020. The audit-related services principally include fees for operating expense audits and agreed-upon procedures projects.
Tax Fees
There were no fees for tax services, including tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, in either 2021 or 2020.
All Other Fees
There were no fees for other services not included above in either 2021 or 2020.
Our Audit Committee considers whether the provision by Ernst & Young LLP of any services that would be required to be described under “All Other Fees” would be compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLP’s independence from both management and the Company.
APPROVAL OF OUR FOURTH AMENDED ANDRESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
80 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
On April 20, 2016, the Board voted to amend and restate our Third Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Third Amended 2005 Plan”) to increase the number of Fungible Units available for issuance thereunder and make certain other amendments. At our annual meeting, the stockholders are being asked to vote on a proposal to approve the adoption of our Fourth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Fourth Amended 2005 Plan”).
Reasonable Plan Cost | ||||||
● | Permits continued alignment of interests through use of equity compensation | |||||
● | Reasonable number of additional shares requested – | |||||
● | Awards | |||||
● | Estimated duration of approximately three | |||||
Responsible Grant Practices | ||||||
● | ||||||
● | All full-value equity awards for our CEO have vesting of at least three years and | |||||
● | Clawback policy applies to equity awards | |||||
● | Robust performance-based hurdles used for | |||||
● | Robust stock ownership guidelines | |||||
Stockholder-Friendly Plan Features | ||||||
● | No single trigger change in control vesting acceleration | |||||
● | No repricing permitted without stockholder approval | |||||
● | Stockholder approval required to increase the share reserve (i.e., no “evergreen” feature) | |||||
● | No dividends or distributions paid on unearned performance-based awards |
The Board unanimously recommends a vote | ||||||
The FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan increases the reserved Fungible Units undernumber of units used for purposes of the planFourth Amended 2005 Plan to determine the number of shares that may be subject to awards thereunder (the “Fungible Units”) by 9,900,0005,180,000 Fungible Units. As of March 31, 2016,2022, there were no fungible units (the “Fungible Units”)Fungible Units available under our ThirdFourth Amended 2005 Plan. In addition, as of the same date, if all of the LTIP units that we granted pursuant to our 2014 Outperformancethe Fourth Amended 2005 Plan subject to performance-based vesting conditions were earned, we would not have reserved shares of stock under our ThirdFourth Amended 2005 Plan with respect to 205,165283,808 of those LTIP units. The Fungible Units represent the baseline for the number of shares of common stock available for
OTHER PROPOSALS | 81 |
issuance under our ThirdFourth Amended 2005 Plan from which, as described in more detail below, different types of awards are counted differently against the Fungible Unit limit. By increasing the reserved Fungible Units, we will be able to continue to use equity awards to attract, retain and motivate employees and we will have sufficient Fungible Units to reserve shares with respect to all of the LTIP units that could be earned under our 2014 Outperformance Plan. the Fourth Amended 2005 Plan subject to performance-based vesting conditions.
We believe that having an equity plan in place with a sufficient number of shares is critical to our ability to attract, retain and motivate employees in a highly competitive marketplace and ensure that our executive compensation is structured in a manner that aligns the executives’ interests with our success. If our stockholders approve this increase in the Fungible Units for grants under the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan, we anticipate we will have sufficient shares to provide equity awards to attract, retain and motivate employees for approximately the next three to four years.
50SL Green Realty Corp.
APPROVAL OF OUR FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
As of the record date for the annual meeting, March 31, 2016,2022, there were 100,079,573an aggregate of 69,279,396 shares of common stock outstanding and 1,757,316common operating partnership units outstanding. AsIn addition, as of March 31, 2016,2022, the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rightsunvested full value awards for which we have reserved shares under our ThirdFourth Amended 2005 Plan is equal to 4,257,931,2,362,245, which includesconsists of (i) 1,561,957388,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options, (921,240which amount includes Class O LTIP units (all of which options and Class O LTIP units are vested and exercisable), (ii) 25,250 restricted stock units and 87,087 phantom stock units that may be settled in851,255 unvested shares of restricted common stock (87,087 of which are vested), (iii) 2,362,131and unvested LTIP units that, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, are convertible into common units, which may be presented to us for redemption and acquired by us for shares of our common stock (2,183,169 of which are vested) and (iv) 221,506(iii) 1,122,990 shares of common stock reserved in connection with LTIP units that could be earned, pursuant to our 2014 Outperformance Plan, all of which remain subject to performance-based vesting. The weighted average exercise price and term of thesethe outstanding options in clause (i) above is $88.23$93.94 and 3.12.3 years, respectively. In addition, an aggregateThe number of 212,759 unvestedshares in clause (iii) above includes the number of shares of restricted common stock that would be issuable if 2020 and 2021 performance-based LTIP unit awards were fully earned and 2022 awards were earned at target; we have not reserved 283,808 shares that could become issuable if all outstanding performance-based LTIP unit awards are earned at the maximum possible level. No awards other than the foregoing were outstanding as of March 31, 2016.2022, under any of our existing or prior equity compensation plans, except for vested full value awards (phantom stock units and vested LTIP units that have not yet been settled for shares of common stock).
The following table sets forth information regarding historical awards granted and earned for the 20132019 through 20152021 period, and the corresponding burn rate, which is defined as the number of shares subject to stock awards granted (or, for awards subject to performance based vesting, earned) in a fiscal year divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for that fiscal year, for each of the last three fiscal years:
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Stock Options Granted | 389,836 | 102,050 | 828,100 | |||||||||
Time-based full-value shares and units granted(1) | 258,922 | 289,739 | 538,761 | |||||||||
Performance-based full-value shares and units earned during the year(2) | 155,879 | 907,239 | 50,001 | |||||||||
Total time-based full-value awards granted and performance-based | ||||||||||||
full-value awards earned | 414,801 | 1,196,978 | 588,762 | |||||||||
Adjusted Full-Value Awards Granted/Earned(3) | 1,244,403 | 3,590,934 | 1,766,286 | |||||||||
Total Awards Granted/Earned(4) | 1,634,239 | 3,692,984 | 2,594,386 | |||||||||
Weighted average common shares/units outstanding during the fiscal year(5) | 103,244,000 | 99,288,000 | 95,004,000 | |||||||||
Stock options granted | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Time-based full-value shares and units granted(1) | 728,738 | 202,257 | 497,326 | |||||||||
Performance-based full-value shares and units earned during the year(2) | 250,290 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Total time-based full-value awards granted and performance-based full-value awards earned | 979,028 | 202,257 | 497,326 | |||||||||
Adjusted full-value awards granted/earned(3) | 1,958,056 | 404,514 | 994,652 | |||||||||
Total Awards Granted/Earned(4) | 1,958,056 | 404,514 | 994,652 | |||||||||
Weighted average common shares/units outstanding during the fiscal year(5) | 69,727,000 | 74,493,000 | 81,332,000 | |||||||||
Annual Burn Rate | 1.58% | 3.72% | 2.73% | 2.81% | 0.54% | 1.22% |
(1) | For each year, includes the number of LTIP Units and shares of common stock granted during such year that were vested or subject to vesting solely based on the grantee’s continued employment through one or more vesting dates. |
(2) | For each year, includes the number of LTIP Units and shares of common stock earned during such year based on the achievement of performance-based vesting criteria. |
(3) | Represents: (i) the sum of time-based full-value awards granted during the year and performance-based full-value awards earned during the year multiplied by (ii) |
(4) | Total Awards Granted/Earned represents the sum of Stock Options Granted and Adjusted Full-Value Awards Granted/Earned. |
82 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
(5) | For each year, represents the weighted average number of shares of our common stock and common units, including LTIP Units, in our operating partnership outstanding during the year. Because we are a real estate investment trust that conducts substantially all of its operations through an operating partnership, we include both shares of our common stock and common units in our operating partnership in the share count for purposes of calculating our burn rate. Each common unit is redeemable at the election of the holder for, at our option in our capacity as general partner of our operating partnership: (i) cash equal to the then fair value of one share of our common stock; or (ii) one share of our common stock. |
SUMMARY OF MATERIAL AMENDMENTS
The following is a brief summary of the material amendments that are included in the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan:
● | The maximum number of Fungible Units available under the Fourth Amended 2005 Plan will be increased under the Fifth Amended 2005 Plan by |
2016 Proxy Statement 51
APPROVAL OF OUR FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
● | The ratios governing the number of Fungible Units used by the different types of awards that may be granted under the |
● | The term of the |
SUMMARY OF THE PROVISIONS OF OUR FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
The following summary of our Fourth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, or the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan is qualified in its entirety by the specific language of the plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Appendix A.
Effective Date of Plan
The Fifth Amended 2005 Plan was approved by our Board of Directors on April 21, 2022. Awards of incentive options may be granted under the Fifth Amended 2005 Plan until the tenth anniversary of June 1, 2022. No other awards may be granted under the 2022 Plan after the date that is ten years from the date of stockholder approval.
Administration
Our Compensation Committee has the authority to administer and interpret the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan, to authorize the granting of awards, to determine the eligibility of a person to receive an award, to determine the number of shares of common stock to be covered by each award, to determine the terms, provisions and conditions of each award, to prescribe the form of instruments evidencing awards and to take any other actions and make all other determinations that it deems necessary or appropriate. Our Compensation Committee may, among other things, establish performance goals that must be met in order for awards to be granted or to vest, or for the restrictions on any such awards to lapse. Nevertheless, grants to members of our Compensation Committee will be made and administered by the Board rather than our Compensation Committee. References below to our Compensation Committee include a reference to the Board for those awards with respect to which the Board acts as administrator. Our Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may delegate to our Chief Executive Officer all or part of our Compensation Committee’s authority and duties with respect to awards to be granted
OTHER PROPOSALS | 83 |
to our employees, subject to certain limitations and guidelines as provided by the Compensation Committee; however, our Compensation Committee may not delegate its authority and duties with respect to awards that have been, or will be, granted to certain of our officers.
Available Shares
Subject to adjustments upon certain corporate transactions or events, awards with respect to up to a maximum of 27,030,00032,210,000 Fungible Units (the “Fungible Pool Limit”) may be granted under the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan, 9,132,68231,474,937 of which willwould remain available for new awards after reserving 767,318if we were to reserve 735,063 Fungible Units with respect to 205,165the 283,808 LTIP units that could be earned under our 2014 Outperformance Plan.the Fourth Amended 2005 Plan subject to performance-based vesting conditions, if all outstanding performance-based LTIP unit awards are earned at the maximum possible level. A Full-Value Award granted on or after the effective date of the Fifth Amended 2005 Plan will be counted as 2.59 Fungible Units per share subject to such award as opposed to 3.74 Fungible Units per share subject to such award granted on or after the effective date of the Fourth Amended 2005 Plan will be counted as 3.74 Fungible Units per share subjectand prior to such award as opposed tothe effective date of the Fifth Amended 2005 Plan, 2.76 Fungible Units per share subject to such award for a Full-Value Award granted on or after the effective date of the Third Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Third Amended 2005 Plan”) and prior to the effective date of the Fourth Amended 2005 Plan and 1.65 Fungible Units per share subject to such award for a Full-Value Award granted on or after the effective date of the Second Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Second Amended 2005 Plan”) and prior to the effective date of the Third Amended 2005 Plan. A Full-Value Award granted prior to the effective date of the Second Amended 2005 Plan that vested or was granted based on the achievement of certain performance goals will be counted as 2.0 Fungible Units per share subject to such award and all other Full-Value Awards granted prior to the effective date of the Second Amended 2005 Plan will be counted as 3.0 Fungible Units per share. Stock options, stock appreciation rights, Class O LTIP units and other awards granted on or after the effective date of the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan that do not deliver the full-value of the underlying shares and expire five years from the date of grant will be counted as 0.730.84 Fungible Units per share. Such awards granted on or after the effective date of the Fourth Amended 2005 Plan and prior to the effective date of the Fifth Amended 2005 Plan will be counted as 0.73 Fungible Units per share, such awards granted on or after the effective date of the Third Amended 2005 Plan and prior to the effective date of the Fourth Amended 2005 Plan will be counted as 0.77 Fungible Units per share, such
52 SL Green Realty Corp.
APPROVAL OF OUR FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
awards granted on or after the effective date of the Second Amended 2005 Plan and prior to the effective date of the Third Amended 2005 Plan will be counted as 0.79 Fungible Units per share and such awards granted prior to the effective date of the Second Amended 2005 Plan will be counted as 0.70 Fungible Units per share. All other awards will be counted as 1.0 Fungible Unit per share.
No award may be granted to any person who, assuming exercise of all options and payment of all awards held by such person, would own or be deemed to own more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. In addition, in any one year, no person may receive awards with respect to more than 700,000 shares of common stock, provided that this limit only applies to awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the IRC and the regulations promulgated thereunder. In addition, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan, the value of all awards awarded under the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan and all other cash compensation paid by the Company as regular compensation to any non-employee director other than the Chairman or Lead Independent Director in any calendar year shall not exceed $500,000, as determined in accordance with FASB ASC 718 (or any successor provision) but excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting provisions.
If an option or other award granted under the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan expires or terminates, the common stock subject to any portion of the award that expires or terminates without having been exercised or paid, as the case may be, will again become available for the issuance of additional awards by adding back Fungible Units to the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan using the same ratio that was in effect when the original awards were granted, except that the ratios for awards forfeited after the effective date of the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan shall not be less than the ratios in effect for such Awards as of the date of forfeiture. The following shares will not be added to the Fungible Units authorized for grant under the Fourth Amended 2005 Plan:Pool Limit: (i) shares tendered or held back upon exercise of an option or settlement or vesting of an award to cover the exercise price or tax withholding, and (ii) shares subject to a stock appreciation right that are not issued in connection with the stock settlement of the stock appreciation right upon exercise thereof.
Awards Under the PlanEligible Persons
Our key employees, directors, officers, advisors, consultants or other personnel or other persons expected to provide significant services (of a type expressly approved by our Compensation Committee as covered services for these purposes) to us or our subsidiaries are eligible to be granted Options, Restricted Stock, Phantom Shares, Dividend Equivalent Rights
84 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
and other equity-based awards under the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan. Eligibility for awards under the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan generally is determined by our Compensation Committee. As of April 22, 2016,18, 2022, approximately 330262 individuals, inclusive of 246 employees who are not officers, eight non-employee directors, eight officers, and no consultants or other persons expected to provided services, are eligible to participate in the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan.
Awards Under the Fifth Amended 2005 Plan
Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights.The terms of specific options, including whether options shall constitute “incentive stock options” for purposes of Section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, will be determined by our Compensation Committee of the Board. The exercise price of an option will be determined by our Compensation Committee and reflected in the applicable award agreement. The exercise price may not be lower than 100% (110% in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a 10% stockholder, if permitted under the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan) of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Each option will be exercisable after the period or periods specified in the award agreement, which will not exceed ten years from the date of grant. Options will be exercisable at such times and subject to such terms as determined by our Compensation Committee; provided that, unless otherwise specified in an award agreement, options, whether or not otherwise exercisable, may be exercised if the grantee’s service relationship is terminated on account of death or disability. Our Compensation Committee may also grant stock appreciation rights, which are options that permit the recipient to exercise the option without the payment of the exercise price and to receive shares of common stock with a fair market value equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares with respect to which the option is being exercised over the exercise price of the option with respect to those shares. Any stock appreciation rights granted are subject to the same limitations as other options, including a maximum term of 10 years and an exercise price no lower than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
Restricted Stock.A restricted stock award is an award of shares of common stock that is subject to restrictions on transferability and such other restrictions, if any, as the Board or Compensation Committee may impose at the date of grant. Grants of restricted stock may be subject to vesting schedules as determined by our Compensation Committee. The restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, including, without limitation, (i) a specified period of employment or the satisfaction of one or a combination of the performance goals set forth in Section 11 of the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan (which is attached hereto as Appendix A), or (ii) based on other goals established by our Compensation Committee. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, upon a termination of employment or other service for cause or by the grantee for any reason, all shares of restricted stock still subject to restrictions will be forfeited. In addition, unless otherwise provided in an applicable award agreement, a participant granted restricted stock will have all the rights of a stockholder of our company, including the right to vote the shares and the right to receive any cash dividends
2016 Proxy Statement 53
APPROVAL OF OUR FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
currently. Dividends paid on all restricted stock will be at the same rate and on the same date as on shares of our common stock; provided that award recipients will be required to repay any cash dividends received on awards that are subject to performance-based vesting conditions unless and until such conditions have been met. Holders of restricted stock are prohibited from selling such shares until they vest.
Phantom Shares.Phantom shares will vest as provided in the applicable award agreement. A phantom share represents a right to receive the fair market value of a share of our common stock, or, if provided by our Compensation Committee, the right to receive the fair market value of a share of our common stock in excess of a base value established by our Compensation Committee at the time of grant. Phantom shares generally may be settled in cash or by transfer of shares of common stock (as may be elected by the participant or our Compensation Committee, as may be provided by our Compensation Committee at grant). Unless otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, subject to elections by the grantee in accordance with the plan, the settlement date with respect to a phantom share is the first day of the month to follow the date on which the phantom share vests. Our Compensation Committee, under certain circumstances, may permit a participant to receive as settlement of the phantom shares installments over a period not to exceed ten years. In addition, our Compensation Committee may establish a program under which distributions with respect to phantom shares may be deferred for additional periods as set forth in the preceding sentence.
Dividend Equivalents.A dividend equivalent is a right to receive (or have credited) the equivalent value (in cash or shares of common stock) of cash distributions made on shares of common stock otherwise subject to an award (e.g., an award of phantom shares); provided, however, that a dividend equivalent right may not be granted in connection with an award of options or stock appreciation rights. Our Compensation Committee may provide that amounts payable in the ordinary course with respect to dividend equivalents will be converted into cash or additional shares of common stock. Our Compensation
OTHER PROPOSALS | 85 |
Committee will establish all other limitations and conditions of awards of dividend equivalents as it deems appropriate. A dividend equivalent granted with respect to an award subject to performance-based vesting conditions may not be payable unless and until such conditions have been met.
Cash-Based AwardsAwards. . The FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan will authorize the granting of awards payable in cash. Each cash-based award will specify a cash-denominated payment amount, formula or payment ranges as determined by our Compensation Committee.
Other Stock-Based Awards.The FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan will authorize the granting of (i) other awards based upon the common stock, including shares based upon certain conditions, convertible preferred shares, convertible debentures and other exchangeable or redeemable securities or equity interests, and stock appreciation rights, (ii) limited-partnership or any other membership or ownership interests (which may be expressed as units, such as LTIP units or Class O LTIP units, or otherwise) in a subsidiary or operating or other partnership (or other affiliate of the company), with any shares issued in connection with the conversion of (or other distribution on account of) such interest subject to the Fungible Pool Limit and the other provisions of the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan, and (iii) awards valued by reference to book value, fair value or performance parameters relative to the company or any subsidiary or group of subsidiaries. Any awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions will not give the participant any right to receive cash dividends or dividend equivalent rights unless and until such conditions have been met.
Adjustments in General; Certain Change in Control Provisions
In the event of certain corporate reorganizations or other events, our Compensation Committee generally may make certain adjustments in its discretion to the manner in which the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan operates (including, for example, to the number of Fungible Units and shares of common stock available under the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan), and may otherwise take actions which, in its judgment, are necessary to preserve the rights of plan participants. Upon a change in control (as defined in the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan), our Compensation Committee generally may make such adjustments as it, in its discretion, determines are necessary or appropriate in light of the change in control, if our Compensation Committee determines that the adjustments do not have an adverse economic impact on the participants, and certain other special provisions may apply.
54 SL Green Realty Corp.
APPROVAL OF OUR FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
Tax Withholding
Participants under the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan are responsible for the payment of any federal, state or local taxes, including those that we are required by law to withhold upon any option exercise or vesting of other awards. Subject to approval by the Compensation Committee, participants may elect to have the tax withholding obligations satisfied either by authorizing the Company to withhold shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to an option exercise or other award, or by transferring to the Company shares of common stock having a value up to the amount of such taxes. Alternatively, the Compensation Committee may provide in an award agreement that a participant is required to satisfy the tax withholding obligation by having shares of common stock withheld by the Company from the shares of common stock otherwise to be received, or require a participant to do so, subject to the participant’s ability to elect to satisfy such liability in cash. Tax withholding may be in excess of the statutory withholding rate if doing so will not result in liability accounting under FASB ASC 718.
Amendment and Termination
We may grant awards under the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan until June 2, 2026,1, 2032, the 10th anniversary of the approval of the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan at the annual meeting. The Board generally may amend our plan as it deems advisable, except that no amendment may adversely affect a participant with respect to an award previously granted unless such amendment is required in order to comply with applicable laws. The Board, in its discretion, may determine to make any plan amendments subject to approval by our stockholders for purposes of complying with applicable stock exchange requirements, ensuring that compensation earned under awards qualifies as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code or ensuring that incentive stock options granted under the FourthFifth Amended 2005 Plan are qualified under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. The ThirdFifth Amended 2005 Plan provides that, to the extent required under the rules of any securities exchange or market system on which our common stock was listed, amendments would be subject to stockholder approval.
86 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Repricing
Except in certain circumstances regarding corporate transactions, without prior stockholder approval, neither the Board nor the Compensation Committee may reduce the option price of outstanding options or stock appreciation rights or cancel, exchange, substitute, buyout or surrender outstanding options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for cash, other awards or options or stock appreciation rights with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original options or stock appreciation rights.
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a summary of the principal U.S. federal income tax consequences of certain transactions under the Fifth Amended 2005 Plan. It does not describe all federal tax consequences under the Fifth Amended 2005 Plan, nor does it describe state, local, foreign or other tax consequences.
Incentive Stock Options
In general, neither the grant nor the exercise of an incentive stock option will result in taxable income to an option holder or a deduction for us.the Company. To receive special tax treatment as an incentive stock option under the Internal Revenue Code as to shares acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option, an option holder must notneither dispose of the shares either within two years after the incentive stock option is granted ornor within one year after the transfer of the shares to the option holder pursuant to exercise of the option. In addition, the option holder must be an employee of oursthe Company or of a qualified subsidiary at all times between the date of grant and the date three months (one year in the case of disability) before exercise of the option. (Special rules apply in the case of the death of the option holder.) Incentive stock option treatment under the Internal Revenue Code generally allows any gain resulting from the sale of shares of the Company’s common stock received upon the exercise of an incentive stock option to beresult in any gain being treated as a capital gain to the option holder, but wethe Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction. The exercise of an incentive stock option (if the holding period rules described in this paragraph are satisfied), however, will give rise to income includable by the option holder in his or her alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of the alternative minimum tax in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the stock acquired on the date of the exercise of the option over the exercise price.
If the holding period rules noted above are not satisfied, certain gain recognized on the disposition of the shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option will be characterized as ordinary income. This gain will be equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise. (Special rules may apply to disqualifying dispositions where the amount realized is less than the value at exercise.) WeThe Company will generally will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of such gain included by an option holder as ordinary income. Any excess of the amount realized upon such disposition over the fair market value at exercise will generally will be long-term or short-term capital gain depending on the holding period involved. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if exercise of the option is permitted other than by cash payment of the exercise price, various special tax rules may apply.
2016 Proxy Statement 55
APPROVAL OF OUR FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
Non-Qualified Stock Options
No income will be recognized by an option holder at the time a non-qualified stock option is granted. Ordinary income will generally will be recognized by an option holder, however, at the time a non-qualified stock option is exercised in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the exercise date over the exercise price. WeThe Company will generally will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes in the same amount as the amount included in ordinary income by the option holder with respect to his or her non-qualified stock option. Gain or loss on a subsequent sale or other disposition of the shares acquired upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock option will be measured by the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and the tax basis of such shares, and will generally will be long-term or short-term capital gain depending on the holding period involved. The tax basis of the shares acquired upon the exercise of any non-qualified stock option will be equaltoequal to the sum of the exercise price of the non-qualified stock option and the amount included in income with respect to the option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that exercise of the option is permitted other than by cash payment of the exercise price, various special tax rules may apply.
OTHER PROPOSALS |
The number of shares and types of awards that may be granted to our executive officers, non-employee directors and other employees is indeterminable at this time, as such grants are subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Of the additional shares to be reserved under the Fourth Amended 2005 Plan, we expect toWe may reserve an aggregate of 205,165up to 283,808 shares in connection with LTIP units that could be earned under our 2014 Outperformance Planoutstanding performance-based awards based on the achievement of cumulative performance goals for the three-year period ending August 31, 2017.at maximum performance levels. These LTIP units are convertible into common units, which may be presented to us for redemption and acquired by us for shares of our common stock. To the extent shares are not available to be issued in exchange for common units presented for redemption, we would redeem such common units for cash. If our absolute and relative performance for
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes the three-year performance period applicable to these awards continues to be the sameCompany’s equity compensation plans as we experienced from the beginning of the performance period through December 31, 2015, no LTIP units would be earned under our 2014 Outperformance Plan. Information regarding the LTIP units that could be earned by each of our executive officers is set forth above under "Executive Compensation–Compensation Discussion and Analysis–Our Executive Compensation Programs–Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards–Outperformance Plans–2014 Outperformance Plan."2021.
Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) | |||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | 3,944,302(2) | 100.56(3) | 2,215,410(4) | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | |||
Total | 3,944,302 | 100.56 | 2,215,410 |
56 SL Green Realty Corp.
(1) | Includes our Fourth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, Amended 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, and 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
(2) | Includes (i) 394,089 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options (394,089 of which are vested and exercisable), (ii) 165,201 phantom stock units that may be settled in shares of common stock (165,201 of which are vested) and (iii) 2,434,492 LTIP units that, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, are convertible into common units, which may be presented to us for redemption and acquired by us for shares of our common stock (1,509,546 of which are vested). |
(3) | Because there is no exercise price associated with restricted stock units, phantom stock units or LTIP units, these awards are not included in the weighted-average exercise price calculation. |
(4) | Balance is after reserving for shares underlying outstanding restricted stock units, phantom stock units granted pursuant to our Non-Employee Directors’ Deferral Program and LTIP Units. The number of securities remaining available consists of shares remaining available for issuance under our 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Third Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. |
88
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
In furtherance of the Committee’s ongoing efforts to foster an ownership culture among our senior leadership team, we adopted stock ownership guidelines for our named executive officers and non-employee directors. We have subsequently revised these guidelines to increase the amount of equity in the Company or its operating partnership that our named executive officers are required to own in order to satisfy the guidelines, as set forth below:
New named executive officers and non-employee directors have three years from the commencement of their employment or election to the Board to attain compliance with the stock ownership requirements.
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and our common stock and common units in our operating partnership as of March 31, 2016,2022, unless otherwise noted, for (i) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’sour outstanding common stock, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our named executive officers who is not a director and (iv) our directors and executive officers as a group. All information in the following table is based on Schedules 13D, 13G and/or any amendments thereto filed with the SEC, and on information supplied to us by our directors and officers. Except as otherwise described in the notes below, the following beneficial owners have sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to all shares set forth opposite their respective names.
As of March 31, 2016, there2022, the following shares and units were 100,166,848outstanding: (i) 65,184,105 shares outstanding.
Name** | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock | Percent of Total | ||
The Vanguard Group(1) | 15,989,869 | 15.96% | ||
Cohen & Steers, Inc.(2) | 10,857,734 | 10.84% | ||
BlackRock, Inc.(3) | 8,828,084 | 8.81% | ||
State Street Corporation(4) | 5,647,935 | 5.64% | ||
John H. Alschuler(5) | 35,711 | * | ||
Betsy S. Atkins(6) | 4,478 | * | ||
Edwin Thomas Burton, III(7) | 46,065 | * | ||
Matthew J. DiLiberto(8) | 68,709 | * | ||
Stephen L. Green(9) | 976,755 | * | ||
Craig M. Hatkoff(10) | 21,839 | * | ||
Marc Holliday(11) | 861,929 | * | ||
Andrew S. Levine(12) | 144,893 | * | ||
John S. Levy(13) | 93,190 | * | ||
Andrew Mathias(14) | 836,979 | * | ||
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (10 Persons) | 3,090,548 | 3.09% |
2016 Proxy Statement 57
Table of Contentsour common stock, (ii) 1,347,073 common units in our operating partnership (other than the units held by us) and (iii) 2,748,218 LTIP units (excluding unearned performance-based LTIP units, which may be earned based on the achievement of performance-based vesting hurdles).
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
Common Stock | Common Stock and Units | |||||||
Name** | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1) | Percent of Common Stock(2) | Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned(1) | Percent of Common Stock and Units(2) | ||||
5% HOLDERS | ||||||||
BlackRock, Inc.(3) | 9,764,636 | 14.98% | 9,764,636 | 14.09% | ||||
The Vanguard Group(4) | 9,679,119 | 14.85% | 9,679,119 | 13.97% | ||||
State Street Corporation(5) | 3,438,086 | 5.27% | 3,438,086 | 4.96% | ||||
Directors, Nominees for Director and Named Executive Officers | ||||||||
John H. Alschuler(6) | 9,085 | * | 26,877 | * | ||||
Betsy S. Atkins(7) | 9,666 | * | 11,419 | * | ||||
Carol N. Brown(8) | — | * | 2,894 | * | ||||
Edwin T. Burton, III(9) | — | * | 35,434 | * | ||||
Matthew J. DiLiberto(10) | 2,899 | * | 99,464 | * | ||||
Lauren B. Dillard(11) | — | * | 29,926 | * | ||||
Stephen L. Green(12) | — | * | 845,316 | 1.22% | ||||
Craig M. Hatkoff | 3,616 | * | 3,616 | * | ||||
Marc Holliday(13) | 109,328 | * | 1,173,857 | 1.69% | ||||
Andrew S. Levine(14) | 24,664 | * | 206,980 | * | ||||
John S. Levy(15) | 28,482 | * | 110,154 | * | ||||
Andrew Mathias(16) | 248,261 | * | 1,080,010 | 1.56% | ||||
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (12 Persons)(17) | 436,001 | * | 3,625,948 | 5.21% |
* | Less than 1%. |
** | Unless otherwise indicated, the business address is |
(1) |
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION | 89 |
included in the “Number of Shares Beneficially Owned” column plus (i) the number of shares of common stock for which common units and LTIP units may be redeemed (assuming, in the case of LTIP units, that they have first been converted into common units) regardless of whether such common units and LTIP units are currently redeemable, but excluding unearned performance-based LTIP units and (ii) the number of shares of common stock issuable upon settlement of outstanding phantom units. Class O LTIP units are not included in the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned.” Class O LTIP units are not economically equivalent to common units, but vested Class O LTIP units may be converted in a manner similar to a net exercise of a stock option into a number of common units that will vary based on the value of the common units upon conversion and the conversion threshold for the Class O LTIP units. Common units are generally redeemable by the holder for cash or, at our election, on a | |
(2) | The total number of shares outstanding used in |
(3) | Based on information provided on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on |
(4) | Based on information provided on a Schedule |
(5) | Based on information provided on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2022 as of December 31, 2021, by State Street Corporation. State Street Corporation |
Includes | |
(7) | Includes, |
(8) | Includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 2,894 phantom units. |
(9) | Includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 35,434 phantom units. |
(10) | Includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 96,565 LTIP units (of which 43,740 LTIP units are subject to vesting). The totals exclude 15,000 Class O LTIP units and all unearned performance-based LTIP units. |
(11) | `Includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 29,926 phantom units. |
(12) | Includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 665,297 common units, 167,134 LTIP units and 12,885 phantom units. |
(13) | Includes 100,000 shares of our common stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, |
Includes | |
Includes | |
Includes | |
(17) | Includes an aggregate of 240,200 shares of common stock and 194,500 shares of common stock underlying exercisable stock options. Also includes, only under the “Number of Shares and Units Beneficially Owned” column, 665,297 common units, 2,342,293 LTIP units |
58 SL Green Realty Corp.
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
90 |
Section 16(a)Series I Preferred Stock
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the Securities Exchange Actour Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, as of 1934,March 31, 2022, for (i) each of our directors, (ii) each of our named executive officers who is not a director and (iii) our directors and executive officers as amended, requiresa group. None of our executive officers andor directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered classany shares of our equity securities to file reportsSeries I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock except as set forth below. As of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered classMarch 31, 2022, there were 9,200,000 shares of our equity securities are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file. To our knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports and any amendments thereto furnished to us during or with respect to our most recent fiscal year, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities were satisfied, with the exception of Messrs. Alschuler, Burton, Hatkoff and Levy who each inadvertently failed to timely file a Form 4 during fiscal year 2015 relating to the award of shares of phantom stock units and, in the case of Mr. Hatkoff, common stock, in connection with their service as directors. Also during fiscal year 2015, Mr. Alschuler inadvertently failed to timely file a Form 4 relating to the conversion of phantom stock units into other securities held in an alternative investment account pursuant to the Company’s deferred compensation plan, Mr. Hatkoff inadvertently failed to timely file a Form 4 relating to the disposition of shares of the Company’s common stock and Messrs. Green and DiLiberto each inadvertently failed to timely file a Form 4 relating to the conversion of LTIP units into shares of the Company’s common stock.Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock outstanding.
2016 Proxy Statement 59
Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock | ||||
Name** | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percent of Outstanding | ||
Matthew J. DiLiberto | 3,000 | * | ||
Marc Holliday | 111,473 | 1.21% | ||
Andrew S. Levine | 5,000 | * | ||
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (12 Persons) | 119,473 | 1.30% |
* | Less than 1%. |
91
Certain Relationships and Related Party TransactionsCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Policies and Procedures With Respect to Related Party Transactions
All related party transactions (generally, transactions involving amounts exceeding $120,000 in which directors and executive officers or their immediate family members, or stockholders owning 5% of more of our outstanding common stock have an interest) are subject to approval or ratification in accordance with the procedures described below.
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the material facts of all related party transactions and either approves or disapproves the entry into such related party transaction. If advance approval of a related party transaction is not feasible, then the related party transaction will be considered and, if our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines it to be appropriate, ratified, at the next regularly scheduled meeting of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In determining whether to approve or ratify a related party transaction, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the related party transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction.
No director may participate in any discussion or approval of a related party transaction for which he or she is a related party, except that the director must provide all material information concerning the related party transaction to our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
If a related party transaction will be ongoing, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may establish guidelines for our management to follow in its ongoing dealings with the related party. Thereafter, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, on at least an annual basis, reviews and assesses ongoing relationships with such related party to see that our management is in compliance with our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s guidelines and that such related party transaction remains appropriate.
Related party transactions are disclosed in our SEC filings.
Cleaning/Security/Messenger and Restoration ServicesCLEANING/SECURITY/MESSENGER AND RESTORATION SERVICES
Through Alliance Building Services, or Alliance, First Quality Maintenance, L.P., or First Quality, provides cleaning, extermination and related services, Classic Security LLC provides security services, Bright Star Couriers LLC provides messenger services, and Onyx Restoration Works provides restoration services with respect to certain properties owned by us. Alliance is partially owned by Gary Green, a son of Stephen L. Green, a director and the former chairman and current chairman emeritus of the Board. In addition, First Quality has the non-exclusive opportunity to provide cleaning and related services to individual tenants at our properties on a basis separately negotiated with any tenant seeking such additional services. The Service CorporationA subsidiary through which we realize income from management, leasing and construction contracts with third parties and joint venture properties has entered into an arrangement with Alliance whereby it will receive profit participation above a certain threshold for services provided by Alliance to certain tenants at certain buildings above the base services specified in their lease agreements. Income earned from profit participation was approximately $3.8$1.7 million, $3.8$1.4 million and $3.5$3.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142021, 2020 and 2013,2019, respectively. We also recorded expenses of approximately $21.3$14.0 million, $21.5$13.3 million and $23.4$18.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142021, 2020 and 2013,2019, respectively, for these services (excluding services provided directly to tenants).
Management FeesTable of Contents
92 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
MANAGEMENT FEES
S.L. Green Management Corp., a consolidated entity, receives property management fees from an entity in which Stephen L. Green owns an interest. We received management fees from such entity of approximately $480,600, $444,300,$0.7 million, $0.6 million and $441,100$0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142021, 2020 and 2013,2019, respectively.
60 MARKETING SERVICESSL Green Realty Corp.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Marketing Services
A-List Marketing, LLC, or A-List, provided marketing services to us. Deena Wolff, a sister of Marc Holliday, our Chief Executive Officer, is the founder of A-List. We recorded expenses of approximately $286,900, $221,100, and $293,600$0.3 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142021, 2020 and 2013, respectively.2019, respectively, for these services.
OtherCHAIRMAN EMERITUS AGREEMENT
Amounts dueOn December 21, 2018, we and Stephen L. Green, the former Chairman of the Company, entered into a chairman emeritus agreement in connection with Mr. Green’s retirement as Chairman of the Company and transition into the role of Chairman Emeritus. Under the chairman emeritus agreement, subject to successive one-year renewal periods, Mr. Green provided services to us as Chairman Emeritus for an initial period from related parties atJanuary 17, 2019 until December 31, 20152019. The chairman emeritus agreement was renewed for the period from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, and 2014 consistedwas renewed again for the period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. For these services, Mr. Green received a monthly retainer of $54,167, in addition to any fees to which Mr. Green is entitled as a non-employee director.
On March 29, 2022, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Green that amended certain terms of the following (in thousands):chairman emeritus agreement. Pursuant to the letter agreement, Mr. Green’s monthly retainer fee was reduced and will ultimately be eliminated. For his service during the periods from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 and January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023, Mr. Green will receive a monthly retainer fee of $36,111 and $18,056, respectively, in addition to any fees to which Mr. Green is entitled as a non-employee director.
2015 | 2014 | |||||
Due from joint ventures | $ | 1,334 | $ | 1,254 | ||
Other | 9,316 | 10,481 | ||||
Related party receivables | $ | 10,650 | $ | 11,735 |
2016 Proxy Statement 61Beginning January 1, 2024, Mr. Green will no longer receive a monthly retainer and will no longer provide consulting services to the Company, but will continue to hold the title of Chairman Emeritus. We will also continue to provide Mr. Green with perquisites under the chairman emeritus agreement consistent with those he previously received as Chairman, as modified by the letter agreement. In addition, Mr. Green will be entitled, to the extent eligible, to continue to participate in our group health insurance at the expense of the Company or, if Mr. Green is not eligible, monthly cash payments equal to the amount payable by Mr. Green under COBRA for continued participation in our group health insurance under COBRA.
93
These proxy materials are being made available in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors, or the Board, of SL Green Realty Corp., a Maryland corporation, for use at our 20162022 annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Thursday, June 2, 20161, 2022 at 10:00 a.m., local time,Eastern Time, in the auditorium at The Grand Hyatt New York, 109 East 42nd Street,One Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10017 or at any postponement or adjournment of the annual meeting.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
What is the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that I received in the mail this year instead of a full set of proxy materials?
In accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, we may furnish proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our 2021 annual report to stockholders, by providing access to these documents on the Internet instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to our stockholders. On or about April 21, 2022, we began mailing to many of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or the Notice, containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our 2021 annual report online, as well as instructions on how to vote.
If you would like to receive a paper or an e-mail copy of our proxy materials for the 2023 annual meeting or for all future annual meetings, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice. We believe the delivery option that we have chosen this year will allow us to provide our stockholders with the proxy materials they need, while lowering the cost of delivery of the materials and reducing the environmental impact of printing and mailing printed copies.
Who is entitled to vote at the annual meeting?
Holders of record of our common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at the close of business on March 31, 2016,2022, the record date for the annual meeting, are entitled to receive notice of the annual meeting and to vote at the annual meeting. If you are a holder of record of our common stock as of the record date, you may vote the shares that you held on the record date even if you sell such shares after the record date. Each outstanding share as of the record date entitles its holder to cast one vote for each matter to be voted upon and, with respect to the election of directors, one vote for each director to be elected. Stockholders do not have the right to cumulate voting for the election of directors.
What is the purpose of the annual meeting?
At the annual meeting, you will be asked to vote on the following proposals:
● | Proposal 1 |
● | Proposal 2 |
● | Proposal 3 |
● | Proposal 4 |
You also may be asked to consider and act upon any other matters that may properly be brought before the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
94 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
What constitutes a quorum?
The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of the total number of outstanding shares entitled to vote at the annual meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of any business at the annual meeting. As of the record date, there were 100,166,84865,184,105 shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting.
Each share of our common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote on each matter properly submitted at the annual meeting and, with respect to the election of directors, one vote for each director to be elected. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” (i.e., shares represented at the meeting held by brokers, as to which instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote such shares and with respect to which, on a particular matter, the broker does not have discretionary voting power to vote such shares) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present for the transaction of business at the annual meeting.
What vote is required to approve each proposal?
For Proposal 1, a majority of all the votes cast with respect to a nominee’s election is required for such nominee to be elected to serve on the Board. This means that the number of votes cast “for” a nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” such nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as a vote cast either “for” or “against” a nominee, and therefore, will have no effect on the election of directors. For more information on the operation of our majority voting standard in director elections, see the section entitled “Our Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance—Majority Voting Standard and Director Resignation Policy.”
A majority of all of the votes cast with respect to the proposal is required for approval of each of Proposals2,Proposals 2, 3 and 4.
In respect of Proposals 22,3 and 3,4, abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast, and therefore will have no effect on the votes for these proposals. In respect of Proposal 4, abstentions will be treated as votes cast and will
62 SL Green Realty Corp.
OTHER INFORMATION
have the same effect as votes against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be treated as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote. Can I change my vote after I submit my proxy card?
If you cast a vote by proxy, you may revoke it at any time before it is voted by:
| |
| |
|
If you attend the annual meeting, you may vote in person whether or not you previously have given a proxy, but your presence (without further action) at the annual meeting will not constitute revocation of a previously given proxy. Unless you have received a legal proxy to vote the shares, if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, that is, in “street name,” only that bank, broker or other nominee can revoke your proxy on your behalf.
You may revoke a proxy for shares held by a bank, broker or other nominee by submitting new voting instructions to the bank, broker or other nominee or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from the bank, broker or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the annual meeting, by attending the annual meeting and voting in person.
How do I vote?
Voting in Person at the Annual MeetingMeeting. . If you hold your shares in your own name as a holder of record with our transfer agent, Computershare, and attend the annual meeting, you may vote in person at the annual meeting. If your shares are held by a bank, broker or other nominee, that is, in “street name,” and you wish to vote in person at the annual meeting, you will need to obtain a “legal proxy” from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares of record.
Voting byIf you received a paper copy of this Proxy Statement. . You should submit your proxy or voting instructions as soon as possible. You can vote by valid proxy received by telephone, electronically via the Internet or by mail. The deadline for voting by telephone or electronically via the Internet is 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on June 1, 2016.May 31, 2022. If voting by mail, you must:
● | indicate your instructions on the proxy |
● | date and sign the proxy |
● | promptly mail the proxy in the enclosed envelope |
● | allow sufficient time for the proxy to be received before the date of the annual meeting |
If your shares are held in “street name” such as in a stock brokerage account, by a bank or other nominee, please follow the instructions you received from your broker or with respect to the voting of your shares.
If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Statement. Please submit your proxy electronically via the Internet using the instructions included in the Notice. The deadline for voting electronically via the Internet is 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 31, 2022.
If you received an e-mail copy of this Proxy Statement. Please submit your proxy electronically via the Internet or telephonically using the instructions included on the Proxy Card. The deadline for voting electronically via the Internet or telephonically is 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 31, 2022.
If you have any questions regarding how to authorize your proxy by telephone or via the Internet, please call MacKenzie Partners, Inc., toll-free at (800) 322-2885 or collect at (212) 929-5500.
OTHER INFORMATION | 95 |
Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we recommend that you submit a proxy to vote your shares in advance so that your vote will be counted if you later are unable to attend the annual meeting.
Can I change my vote after I have voted?
If you cast a vote by proxy, you may revoke it at any time before it is voted by:
● | filing a written notice revoking the proxy with our Secretary at our address; |
● | properly signing and forwarding to us a proxy with a later date; or |
● | voting during the annual meeting |
If you attend the annual meeting, you may vote whether or not you previously have given a proxy, but your attendance (without further action) at the annual meeting will not constitute revocation of a previously given proxy. Unless you have received a legal proxy to vote the shares, if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, that is, in “street name,” only that bank, broker or other nominee can revoke your proxy on your behalf.
You may revoke a proxy for shares held by a bank, broker or other nominee by submitting new voting instructions to the bank, broker or other nominee, or by attending the annual meeting and voting during the meeting. See “How Do I Vote? –Voting During the Annual Meeting” above.
How is my vote counted?
If you authorize your proxy to vote your shares electronically via the Internet or by telephone, or, if you received a proxy card by mail and you properly marked, signed, dated and returned it, the shares that the proxy represents will be voted in the manner specified on the proxy. If no specification is made, your shares will be voted “for” the election of the nominees for the Class I directors named in this proxy statement, “for” advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, “for” the approval our Fourth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and “for” ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.2022 and “for” the approval of our Fifth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. It is not anticipated that any matters other than those set forth in this proxy statement will be presented at the annual meeting. If other matters are presented, proxies will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holders.
How does the Board recommend that I vote on each of the proposals?
The Board recommends that you vote:
Board Recommendation | |||||
Proposal 1:Election of Directors | FOR | ||||
FOR | |||||
FOR 2022 | |||||
Proposal 4: | FOR the approval of the Fifth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
2016 Proxy Statement 63
96 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
OTHER INFORMATION
What other information should I review before voting?
Our 20152021 annual report, including financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2021, is being made available to you along with this proxy statement. You may obtain, free of charge, copies of our2015our 2021 annual report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2021, which contains additional information about the Company, on our website at http://www.slgreen.com or by directing your request in writing to SL Green Realty Corp., 420 LexingtonOne Vanderbilt Avenue, 28th Floor, New York, New York 10170-1881,10017-3852, Attention: Investor Relations. The 20152021 annual report and the Annual Report on Form 10-K, however, are not part of the proxy solicitation materials, and the information found on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this proxy statement or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.
Who is soliciting my proxy?
This solicitation of proxies is made by and on behalf of the Board. We will pay the cost of the solicitation of proxies. We have retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc. at an aggregate estimated cost of $10,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses, to assist in the solicitation of proxies. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies personally or by telephone.
How do I change how I receive proxy materials in the future?
Instead of receiving a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the mail for future meetings, stockholders may elect to receive links to proxy materials by e-mail or to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials and a paper proxy card by mail. If you elect to receive proxy materials by e-mail, you will not receive proxy materials in the mail (including, if applicable, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials).Materials in the mail. Instead, you will receive an e-mail with links to proxy materials and online voting. In addition, if you elect to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, or if applicable rules or regulations require paper delivery of the proxy materials, you will not receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the mail. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the mail, you can eliminate all such paper mailings (including, if applicable, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials) in the future by electing to receive an e-mail that will provide Internet links to these documents. Opting to receive all future proxy materials online will save us the cost of producing and mailing such documents to you and help us conserve natural resources. You can change your election by directing your request in writing to SL Green Realty Corp., 420 LexingtonOne Vanderbilt Avenue, 28th Floor, New York, New York 10170-1881,10017-3852., Attention: Investor Relations, by sending a blank e-mail with the 12-digit16-digit control number on your proxy cardNotice of Internet Availability to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com, via the internet at http://www.proxyvote.com or by telephone at (800) 579-7639.579-1639. Your election will remain in effect until you change it.
What should I do if I received more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?
There are circumstances under which you may receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate voting instruction card for each such brokerage account. In addition, if you are a stockholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. Please authorize your proxy in accordance with the instructions of each Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials separately, since each one represents different shares that you own.
No person is authorized on our behalf to give any information or to make any representations with respect to the proposals other than the information and the representations contained in this proxy statement, and, if given or made, such information and/or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized.
Attendance at the 2022 Annual Meeting
All stockholders of record, as well as stockholders that hold their shares through a broker, bank or similar organization, of shares of SLG’s common stock at the close of business on the record date, or their designated proxies, are authorized to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting. Stockholders will be able to vote and submit questions during the annual meeting.
Solicitation of Proxies
We will pay the cost of solicitation of proxies. Our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies personally, by telephone, via the Internet or by mail without additional compensation for such activities. We also will request persons, firms and corporations holding shares in their names or in the names of their nominees, which are beneficially owned by others, to
OTHER INFORMATION | 97 |
send a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to and obtain proxies from such beneficial owners. We will reimburse such holders for their reasonable expenses. In addition, we intend to utilize the proxy solicitation services of MacKenzie Partners, Inc. at an aggregate estimated cost of $10,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses.
Stockholder Proposals and Nominations
Proposals for Inclusion in our 20172023 Proxy Materials
SEC rules permit stockholders to submit proposals to be included in our proxy materials if the stockholder and the proposal satisfy the requirements specified in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 20172022 annual meeting, the proposal must be delivered to our Secretary at the address provided below by December 23, 2016.22, 2022.
64 SL Green Realty Corp.
TableIn addition to satisfying the requirements under our bylaws, in order to comply with the SEC’s universal proxy rules (once effective), stockholders who intend to solicit their proxies in support of Contentsdirector nominees other than our Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than April 2, 2023.
OTHER INFORMATION
Director Nominations for Inclusion in our 20172023 Proxy Materials (Proxy Access)
Our proxy access bylaw permits a stockholder (or a group of up to 20 stockholders) owning 3% or more of the Company’sour outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director candidates constituting up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, if the nominating stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in our bylaws. For the 20172023 annual meeting, notice of a proxy access nomination must be delivered to our Secretary at the address provided below no later than December 23, 201622, 2022 and no earlier than November 23, 2016.22, 2022.
Other Proposals or Nominations to be brought before our 20172023 Annual Meeting
Our bylaws permit a stockholder to propose items of business and/or nominate director candidates that are not intended to be included in our proxy materials if the stockholder complies with the procedures set forth in our bylaws. For the 20172023 annual meeting, notice of such proposals or nominations must be delivered to our Secretary at the address provided below no later than March 4, 20173, 2023 and no earlier than February 2, 2017.1, 2023.
If the Company moves the 20172023 annual meeting to a date that is more than 25 days before or after the date which is the one yearone-year anniversary of this year’s annual meeting date (i.e., June 2, 2017)1, 2023), the Company must receive such notice of proposals or nominations no later than the close of business on the 10th day following the earlier of the day on which the Company makes a public announcement of the meeting date or theythe day on which notice of the meeting date is first distributed to stockholders.
Address for Submission of Notices and Additional Information
All stockholder nominations of individuals for election as directors or proposals of other items of business to be considered by stockholders at the 20172023 annual meeting (whether or not intended for inclusion in our proxy materials) must be submitted in writing to SL Green Realty Corp., 420 LexingtonOne Vanderbilt Avenue, 28th Floor, New York, New York 10170-1881,10017-3852, Attention: Andrew S. Levine, Secretary.
In addition, both the proxy access and the advance notice provisions of our bylaws require a stockholder’s notice of a nomination or other item of business to include certain information. Director nominees must also meet certain eligibility requirements. Any stockholder considering introducing a nomination or other item of business should carefully review our bylaws.
Householding of Proxy Materials
The SEC adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy materials with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement, annual report or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable, addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.
98 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
This year, a number of brokers with account holders who are our stockholders will be “householding” our proxy materials. A single Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that such broker will be “householding” communications, including the proxy materials, to your address, “householding” will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent.
Stockholders who currently receive only one copy of the proxy materials at their address and would like to receive additional copies and/or stockholders who no longer wish to participate in “householding” and would prefer to receive separate proxy materials in the future should direct their request either to their broker or to the Company in writing to SL Green Realty Corp., 420 LexingtonOne Vanderbilt Avenue, 28th Floor, New York, New York 10170-1881,10017-3852, Attention: Investor Relations or by telephone at (212) 594-2700.
Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the proxy materials at their address and would like to request “householding” of their future communications should direct their request either to their broker or to the Company at the address of telephone number above.
New York, New YorkApril 22, 2016
2016 Proxy Statement 65
A-1
SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTHFIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
Table of Contents
2016Proxy Statement A-1
A-2 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH
FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
SL GREEN REALTY CORP.
FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED
2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
SL Green Realty Corp., a Maryland corporation, wishes to attract and retain qualified key employees, Directors, officers, advisors, consultants and other personnel and encourage them to increase their efforts to make the Company’s business more successful whether directly or through its Subsidiaries or other affiliates. In furtherance thereof, the SL Green Realty Corp. FourthFifth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended as of June 2, 2016,1, 2022, is designed to provide equity-based incentives to certain Eligible Persons. Awards under the Plan may be made to Eligible Persons in the form of Options, Restricted Stock, Phantom Shares, Dividend Equivalent Rights, Cash-Based Awards or other forms of equity-based compensation.
1. | DEFINITIONS. |
Whenever used herein, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
“Award,” except where referring to a particular category of grant under the Plan, shall include Incentive Stock Options, Non-Qualified Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Phantom Shares, Dividend Equivalent Rights, Cash-Based Awards and other equity-based Awards as contemplated herein.
“Award Agreement” means a written agreement in a form approved by the Committee to be entered into between the Company and the Participant as provided in Section 3. An Award Agreement may be, without limitation, an employment or other similar agreement containing provisions governing grants hereunder, if approved by the Committee for use under the Plan.
“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
“Cause” means, unless otherwise provided in the Participant’s Award Agreement, (i) engaging in (A) willful or gross misconduct or (B) willful or gross neglect; (ii) repeatedly failing to adhere to the directions of superiors or the Board or the written policies and practices of the Company or its Subsidiaries or its affiliates; (iii) the commission of a felony or a crime of moral turpitude, dishonesty, breach of trust or unethical business conduct, or any crime involving the Company or its Subsidiaries, or any affiliate thereof; (iv) fraud, misappropriation or embezzlement; (v) any illegal act detrimental to the Company its Subsidiaries or any affiliate thereof; (vi) repeated failure to devote substantially all of the Participant’s business time and efforts to the Company or its Subsidiaries, or any affiliate thereof, if required by the Participant’s employment agreement; or (vii) the Participant’s failure adequately and competently to perform his duties after receiving notice from the Company or its Subsidiaries, or any affiliate thereof specifically identifying the manner in which the Participant has failed to perform; provided, however, that, if at any particular time the Participant is subject to an effective employment agreement or consulting agreement with the Company, then, in lieu of the foregoing definition, “Cause” shall at that time have such meaning as may be specified in such employment agreement.
“Cash-Based Awards” means an Award under Section 10 of the Plan that is payable in cash.
“Change in Control” means:
(i) any “person,” including a “group” (as such terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act, together with all “affiliates” and “associates” (as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act) of such person, shall become the “beneficial owner” (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 25% or more of either (A) the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities having the right to vote in an election of the Board (“Voting Securities”) or (B) the then outstanding shares of all classes of stock of the Company (in either such case other than as a result of the acquisition of securities directly from the Company);
APPENDIX A | A-3 |
(ii) the members of the Board at the beginning of any consecutive 24-calendar-month period commencing on or after the initial effective date of the Plan (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease for any reason other than death including without limitation, as a result of a tender offer, proxy contest, merger or similar transaction, to constitute at least a majority of the members of the Board; provided that any person becoming a director of the Company whose election or nomination was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors shall, for purposes hereof, be considered an Incumbent Director;
(iii) the consummation of (A) any consolidation or merger of the Company or any subsidiary that would result in the Voting Securities outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation representing (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) less
A-2 SL Green Realty Corp.
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
than 50% of the total voting power of the voting securities of the surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation or ceasing to have the power to elect at least a majority of the board of directors or other governing body of such surviving entity or (2) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of transactions contemplated or arranged by any party as a single plan) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, if the stockholders of the Company and unitholders of SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P. taken as a whole and considered as one class immediately before such transaction own, immediately after consummation of such transaction, equity securities and partnership units possessing less than 50% of the surviving or acquiring company and partnership taken as a whole; or
(iv) the stockholders of the Company shall approve any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the Company.
Notwithstanding the foregoing clause (i), an event described in clause (i) shall not be a Change in Control if such event occurs solely as the result of an acquisition of securities by the Company which, by reducing the number of shares of stock or other Voting Securities outstanding, increases (x) the proportionate number of shares of stock of the Company beneficially owned by any “person” (as defined above) to 25% or more of the shares of stock then outstanding or (y) the proportionate voting power represented by the Voting Securities beneficially owned by any “person” (as defined above) to 25% or more of the combined voting power of all then outstanding Voting Securities; provided, however, that if any “person” referred to in clause (x) or (y) of this sentence shall thereafter become the beneficial owner of any additional stock of the Company or other Voting Securities (other than pursuant to a share split, stock dividend, or similar transaction), then a Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred for purposes of the foregoing clause (i).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no event or condition shall constitute a Change in Control to the extent that, if it were, a 20% tax would be imposed under Section 409A of the Code; provided that, in such a case, the event or condition shall continue to constitute a Change in Control to the maximum extent possible (e.g., if applicable, in regard of vesting without an acceleration of distribution) without causing the imposition of such 20% tax.
“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
“Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board.
“Common Stock” means the shares of common stock of the Company as constituted on the effective date of the Plan, and any other shares into which such common stock shall thereafter be changed by reason of a recapitalization, merger, consolidation, split-up, combination, exchange of shares or the like.
“Company” means SL Green Realty Corp., a Maryland corporation.
“Director” means a non-employee director of the Company or its Subsidiaries.
“Disability” means, unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the Participant’s Award Agreement, a disability which renders the Participant incapable of performing all of his or her material duties for a period of at least 150 consecutive or non-consecutive days during any consecutive twelve-month period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no circumstances or condition shall constitute a Disability to the extent that, if it were, a 20% tax would be imposed under Section 409A of the Code; provided that, in such a case, the event or condition shall continue to constitute a Disability to the maximum extent possible (e.g., if applicable, in regard of vesting without an acceleration of distribution) without causing the imposition of such 20% tax.
A-4 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
“Dividend Equivalent Right” means a right awarded under Section 8 of the Plan to receive (or have credited) the equivalent value of dividends paid on Common Stock.
“Eligible Person” means a key employee, Director, officer, advisor, consultant or other personnel of the Company and its Subsidiaries or other person expected to provide significant services (of a type expressly approved by the Committee as covered services for these purposes) to the Company or its Subsidiaries.
“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
“Fair Market Value” per Share as of a particular date means (i) if Shares are then listed on a national stock exchange, the closing sales price per Share on the exchange for the last preceding date on which there was a sale of Shares on such exchange, as determined by the Committee, (ii) if Shares are not then listed on a national stock exchange but are then traded on an over-the-counter market, the average of the closing bid and asked prices for the Shares in such over-the-counter market for the last preceding date on which there was a sale of such Shares in such market, as determined by the
2016Proxy Statement A-3
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
Committee, or (iii) if Shares are not then listed on a national stock exchange or traded on an over-the-counter market, such value as the Committee in its discretion may in good faith determine; provided that, where the Shares are so listed or traded, the Committee may make such discretionary determinations where the Shares have not been traded for 10 trading days.
“Full-Value Award” means an Award other than an Option, Stock Appreciation Right or other Award that does not deliver the full value at grant thereof of the underlying shares.
“Fungible Pool Unit” shall be the measuring unit used for purposes of the Plan, as specified in Section 4, to determine the number of Shares which may be subject to Awards hereunder, which shall consist of Shares in the proportions (a) with respect to Awards granted prior to June 15, 2010 (ranging from 0.7 to 3.0), (b) with respect to Awards granted on or after June 15, 2010 but before June 13, 2013 (ranging from 0.79 to 1.65), (c) with respect to Awards granted on or after June 13, 2013 but before June 2, 2016 (ranging from 0.77 to 2.76) and, (d) with respect to Awards granted on or after June 2, 2016 (ranging from 0.73 to 3.74,3.74) and (e) with respect to Awards granted on or after June 1, 2022 (ranging from 0.84 to 2.59), as set forth in Section 4(a).
“Grantee” means an Eligible Person granted Restricted Stock, Phantom Shares, Dividend Equivalent Rights or such other equity-based Awards as may be granted pursuant to Section 9.
“Incentive Stock Option” means an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of Section 422(b) of the Code.
“Non-Qualified Stock Option” means an Option which is not an Incentive Stock Option.
“Option” means the right to purchase, at a price and for the term fixed by the Committee in accordance with the Plan, and subject to such other limitations and restrictions in the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, a number of Shares determined by the Committee.
“Optionee” means an Eligible Person to whom an Option is granted, or the Successors of the Optionee, as the context so requires.
“Option Price” means the price per Share, determined by the Board or the Committee, at which an Option may be exercised.
“Participant” means a Grantee or Optionee.
“Performance Criteria” means the following business criteria (or any combination thereof) with respect to one or more of the Company, any Subsidiary or any division or operating unit thereof: (i) pre-tax income, (ii) after-tax income, (iii) net income (meaning net income as reflected in the Company’s financial reports for the applicable period, on an aggregate, diluted and/or per share basis), (iv) operating income, (iv) cash flow, (v) earnings per share, (vi) return on equity, (vii) return on invested capital or assets, (viii) cash and/or funds available for distribution, (ix) appreciation in the fair market value of the Common Stock, (x) return on investment, (xi) total return to shareholders, (xii) net earnings growth, (xiii) stock appreciation (meaning an increase in the price or value of the Common Stock after the date of grant of an award and during the applicable period), (xiv) related return ratios, (xv) increase in revenues, (xvi) net earnings, (xvii) changes (or the absence of changes) in the per share or aggregate market price of the Company’s Common Stock, (xviii) number of securities sold, (xix) earnings before any one or more of the following items: interest, taxes, depreciation or amortization for the applicable period, as reflected in
APPENDIX A | A-5 |
the Company’s financial reports for the applicable period, (xx) total revenue growth (meaning the increase in total revenues after the date of grant of an award and during the applicable period, as reflected in the Company’s financial reports for the applicable period), (xxi) the Company’s published ranking against its peer group of real estate investment trusts based on total shareholder return, and (xxii) FFO.
“Performance Goals” means (i) 7% FFO growth, (ii) 10% total return to shareholders and (iii) Total return to shareholders in the top one-third of the “peer group”.group.” For purposes of this definition, “peer group” shall be Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc., American Financial Realty Trust, Boston Properties, Inc., Brandywine Realty Trust, Corporate Office Properties Trust, Crescent Real Estate Equities Company, Douglas Emmett, Duke Realty Corporation, Highwoods Properties, Inc., HRPT Properties, Kilroy Realty Corporation, Liberty Property Trust, Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, Maguire Properties, Parkway Properties, SL Green Realty Corp., and Washington REIT. Such “peer group” may not change with respect to any particular Award.
“Phantom Share” means a right, pursuant to the Plan, of the Grantee to payment of the Phantom Share Value.
“Phantom Share Value,” per Phantom Share, means the Fair Market Value of a Share of Common Stock, or, if so provided by the Committee, such Fair Market Value to the extent in excess of a base value established by the Committee at the time of grant.
A-4 SL Green Realty Corp.
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
“Plan” means the Company’s FourthFifth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on June 2, 2016,1, 2022, as set forth herein and as the same may from time to time be amended.
“Restricted Stock” means an award of Shares that are subject to restrictions hereunder.
“Retirement” means, unless otherwise provided by the Committee in the Participant’s Award Agreement, the Termination of Service (other than for Cause) of a Participant on or after the Participant’s attainment of age 65 or on or after the Participant’s attainment of age 55 with five consecutive years of service with the Company and or its Subsidiaries or its affiliates.
“Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
“Settlement Date” means the date determined under Section 7.4(c).
“Shares” means shares of Common Stock of the Company.
“Stock Appreciation Right” means the right to settle an Option as provided for in Section 5.7.
“Subsidiary” means any corporation (other than the Company) that is a “subsidiary corporation” with respect to the Company under Section 424(f) of the Code. In the event the Company becomes a subsidiary of another company, the provisions hereof applicable to subsidiaries shall, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, also be applicable to any company that is a “parent corporation” with respect to the Company under Section 424(e) of the Code.
“Successor of the Optionee” means the legal representative of the estate of a deceased Optionee or the person or persons who shall acquire the right to exercise an Option by bequest or inheritance or by reason of the death of the Optionee.
“Termination of Service” means a Participant’s termination of employment or other service, as applicable, with the Company and its Subsidiaries.
2.EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERMINATION OF PLAN.
2. | EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERMINATION OF PLAN. |
The effective date of the Plan is June 2, 2016.1, 2022. The amendments reflected in this FourthFifth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan shall not become effective unless and until it is approved by the requisite percentage of the holders of the Common Stock of the Company. The Plan shall terminate on, and no Award shall be granted hereunder on or after, the 10-year anniversary of the approval of this FourthFifth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan by the shareholders of the Company; provided, that no Incentive Stock Options shall be granted hereunder on or after the 10-year anniversary of the approval of this FourthFifth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan by the Board; provided further that the Board may at any time prior to that date terminate the Plan; and provided, further, that all Awards made under the Plan prior to a Plan termination shall remain in effect until such Awards have been satisfied or terminated in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement.
Table of Contents3.ADMINISTRATION OF PLAN.
A-6 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
3. | ADMINISTRATION OF PLAN. |
(a) The Plan shall be administered by the Committee appointed by the Board. Unless otherwise determined by the Board, the Committee, upon and after such time as it is covered in Section 16 of the Exchange Act, shall consist of at least two individuals each of whom shall be a “nonemployee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Rule 16b-3”) under the Exchange Act and shall, at such times as the Company is subject to Section 162(m) of the Code (to the extent relief from the limitation of Section 162(m) of the Code is sought with respect to Awards), qualify as “outside directors” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code; provided that no action taken by the Committee (including without limitation grants) shall be invalidated because any or all of the members of the Committee fails to satisfy the foregoing requirements of this sentence. If and to the extent applicable, no member of the Committee may act as to matters under the Plan specifically relating to such member. Notwithstanding the other foregoing provisions of this Section 3(a), any Award under the Plan to a person who is a member of the Committee shall be made and administered by the Board. If no Committee is designated by the Board to act for these purposes, the Board shall have the rights and responsibilities of the Committee hereunder and under the Award Agreements.
(b) Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall in its discretion (i) authorize the granting of Awards to Eligible Persons; and (ii) determine the eligibility of Eligible Persons to receive an Award, as well as determine the number of Shares to be covered under any Award Agreement, considering the position and responsibilities of the Eligible Persons, the nature and value to the Company of the Eligible Person’s present and potential contribution to the success of the Company whether directly or through its Subsidiaries and such other factors as the Committee may deem relevant.
2016Proxy Statement A-5
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
(c) The Award Agreement shall contain such other terms, provisions and conditions not inconsistent herewith as shall be determined by the Committee. In the event that any Award Agreement or other agreement hereunder provides (without regard to this sentence) for the obligation of the Company or any affiliate thereof to purchase or repurchase Shares from a Participant or any other person, then, notwithstanding the provisions of the Award Agreement or such other agreement, such obligation shall not apply to the extent that the purchase or repurchase would not be permitted under governing state law. The Participant shall take whatever additional actions and execute whatever additional documents the Committee may in its reasonable judgment deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out or effect one or more of the obligations or restrictions imposed on the Participant pursuant to the express provisions of the Plan and the Award Agreement.
(d) The Committee may provide, in its discretion, that (i) all stock issued hereunder be initially maintained in separate brokerage account for the Participant at a brokerage firm selected by, and pursuant to an arrangement with, the Company; and (ii) in the case of vested Shares, the Participant may move such Shares to another brokerage account of the Participant’s choosing or request that a stock certificate be issued and delivered to him or her.
(e) The Committee, in its discretion, may delegate to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company all or part of the Committee’s authority and duties with respect to awards, including, without limitation, the granting of awards to individuals who are not subject to the reporting and other provisions of Section 16 of the Act and who are not and are not expected to be “covered employees” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. Any such delegation by the Committee may, in the sole discretion of the Committee, include a limitation as to the amount of awards that may be awarded during the period of the delegation and may contain guidelines as to the determination of the option exercise price, or price of other awards and the vesting criteria. The Committee may revoke or amend the terms of a delegation at any time but such action shall not invalidate any prior actions of the Committee’s delegate that were consistent with the terms of the Plan.
4.SHARES AND UNITS SUBJECT TO THE PLAN.
4. | SHARES AND UNITS SUBJECT TO THE PLAN. |
(a) Subject to adjustments as provided in Section 15, the total number of Shares subject to Awards granted under the Plan, in the aggregate, may not exceed 27,030,00032,210,000 (the “Fungible Pool Limit”). Each Share issued or to be issued in connection with Full-Value Awards that vest or are granted based on the achievement of the Performance Goals granted prior to June 15, 2010 but before June 13, 2013 shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 2.0 Fungible Pool Units. Each Share issued or to be issued in connection with any other Full-Value Awards granted prior to June 15, 2010 but before June 13, 2013 shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 3.0 Fungible Pool Units. Each Share issued or to be issued in connection with any Full-Value Awards granted on or after June 15, 2010 but before June 13, 2013 shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 1.65 Fungible Pool Units. Each Share issued or to be issued in connection with any Full-Value Awards granted on or after June 13, 2013 but before June 2, 2016 shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 2.76 Fungible Pool Units. Each Share issued or to be issued in connection with any Full-Value Awards granted on or after June 2, 2016 but before June 1, 2022 shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 3.74 Fungible Pool Units. Each Share issued or to be
APPENDIX A | A-7 |
issued in connection with any Full-Value Awards granted on or after June 1, 2022 shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 2.59 Fungible Pool Units. Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and other Awards that do not deliver the full value at grant thereof of the underlying Shares and that expire 10 years from the date of grant shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 1 Fungible Pool Unit. Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and other Awards that do not deliver the full value at grant thereof of the underlying Shares and that expire five years from the date of grant (i) granted prior to June 15, 2010 shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 0.7 of a Fungible Pool Unit, (ii) granted on or after June 15, 2010 but before June 13, 2013 shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 0.79 of a Fungible Pool Unit, (iii) granted on or after June 13, 2013 but before June 2, 2016 shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 0.77 of a Fungible Pool Unit, and (iv) granted on or after June 2, 2016 but before June 1, 2022 shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 0.73 of a Fungible Pool Unit and (v) granted on or after June 1, 2022 shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 0.84 of a Fungible Pool Unit. (For these purposes, the number of Shares taken into account with respect to a Stock Appreciation Right shall be the number of Shares underlying the Stock Appreciation Rights at grant (i.e., not the final number of Shares delivered upon exercise of the Stock Appreciation Rights).) Shares that have been granted as Restricted Stock or that have been reserved for distribution in payment for Options, Phantom Shares or other equity-based Awards but are later forfeited or for any other reason are not payable under the Plan may again be made the subject of Awards under the Plan. Such Shares shall be added back to the Plan using the same ratio as in effect when such Awards were granted, except that the ratios for Awards forfeited after June 2, 20161, 2022 shall not be less than the ratios in effect for such Awards as of the date of forfeiture. The following Shares shall not be added to the Shares authorized for grant under the Plan: (i) Shares tendered or held back upon exercise of an Option or settlement or vesting of an Award to cover the exercise price or tax withholding, and (ii) shares subject to a Stock Appreciation Right that are not issued in connection with the stock settlement of the Stock Appreciation Right upon exercise thereof.
(b) Shares subject to Dividend Equivalent Rights, other than Dividend Equivalent Rights based directly on the dividends payable with respect to Shares subject to Options or the dividends payable on a number of Shares corresponding to the number of Phantom Shares awarded, shall be subject to the limitation of Section 4(a). If any Phantom Shares, Dividend Equivalent Rights or other equity-based Awards under Section 9 are paid out in cash, then, notwithstanding the first sentence of Section 4(a) above (but subject to the second sentence thereof) the underlying Shares may again be made the subject of Awards under the Plan.
A-6 SL Green Realty Corp.
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
(c) The certificates for Shares issued hereunder may include any legend which the Committee deems appropriate to reflect any rights of first refusal or other restrictions on transfer hereunder or under the Award Agreement, or as the Committee may otherwise deem appropriate.
(d) No award may be granted under the Plan to any person who, assuming exercise of all options and payment of all awards held by such person, would own or be deemed to own more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. Subject to adjustments as provided in Section 15, no Eligible Person shall be granted Awards in any one year covering more than 700,000 Shares (with each Share subject to an Award being counted as one Share, notwithstanding the type of Award or the fact that it may count as more or less than one Fungible Pool Unit for purposes of Section 4(a)), it being expressly contemplated that Awards in exclusively one category (e.g., Options) can (but need not) be used in the discretion of the Committee to reach the limitation set forth in this sentence; provided that this limit shall only apply to Awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
(e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, the value of all Awards awarded under this Plan and all other cash compensation paid by the Company as regular compensation to any Director other than the Chairman or the Lead Director in any calendar year shall not exceed $500,000. For the purpose of this limitation, the value of any Award shall be its grant date fair value, as determined in accordance with FASB ASC 718 (or any successor provision) but excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting provisions.
5. | PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO STOCK OPTIONS. |
5.PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO STOCK OPTIONS.
5.1Grant of Option.
5.1 | Grant of Option. |
Subject to the other terms of the Plan, the Committee (or, as expressly permitted by Section 3, the Chief Executive Officer) shall, in its discretion as reflected by the terms of the applicable Award Agreement: (i) determine and designate from time to time those Eligible Persons to whom Options are to be granted and the number of Shares to be optioned to each Eligible Person; (ii) determine whether to grant Incentive Stock Options or to grant Non-Qualified Stock Options, or both (to the extent that any Option does not qualify as an Incentive Stock Option, it shall constitute a separate Non-Qualified Stock
A-8 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Option); provided that Incentive Stock Options may only be granted to employees; (iii) determine the time or times when and the manner and condition in which each Option shall be exercisable and the duration of the exercise period; (iv) designate each Option as one intended to be an Incentive Stock Option or as a Non-Qualified Stock Option; and (v) determine or impose other conditions to the grant or exercise of Options under the Plan as it may deem appropriate.
5.2Option Price.
5.2 | Option Price. |
The Option Price shall be determined by the Committee on the date the Option is granted and reflected in the Award Agreement, as the same may be amended from time to time. The Option Price shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the day the Option is granted. Any particular Award Agreement may provide for different exercise prices for specified amounts of Shares subject to the Option.
5.3Period of Option and Vesting.
5.3 | Period of Option and Vesting. |
(a) Unless earlier expired, forfeited or otherwise terminated, each Option shall expire in its entirety upon the 10th anniversary of the date of grant or shall have such other term (which may be shorter, but not longer) as is set forth in the applicable Award Agreement (except that, in the case of an individual described in Section 422(b)(6) of the Code (relating to certain 10% owners) who is granted an Incentive Stock Option, the term of such Option shall be no more than five years from the date of grant). The Option shall also expire, be forfeited and terminate at such times and in such circumstances as otherwise provided hereunder or under the Award Agreement.
(b) Each Option, to the extent that the Optionee has not had a Termination of Service and the Option has not otherwise lapsed, expired, terminated or been forfeited, shall first become exercisable according to the terms and conditions set forth in the Award Agreement, as determined by the Committee at the time of grant. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, no Option (or portion thereof) shall ever be exercisable if the Optionee has a Termination of Service before the time at which such Option (or portion thereof) would otherwise have become exercisable, and any Option that would otherwise become exercisable after such Termination of Service shall not become exercisable and shall be forfeited upon such termination. Upon and after the death of an Optionee, such Optionee’s Options, if and to the extent otherwise exercisable hereunder or under the applicable Award Agreement after the Optionee’s death, may be exercised by the Successors of the Optionee.
2016Proxy Statement A-7
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
5.4Exercisability Upon and After Termination of Optionee.
5.4 | Exercisability Upon and After Termination of Optionee. |
(a) Subject to provisions of the Award Agreement, in the event the Optionee has a Termination of Service other than by the Company or its Subsidiaries for Cause, or other than by reason of death or Disability, no exercise of an Option may occur after the expiration of the three-month period to follow the termination, or if earlier, the expiration of the term of the Option as provided under Section 5.3(a); provided that, if the Optionee should die after the Termination of Service, such termination being for a reason other than Cause or Disability, but while the Option is still in effect, the Option (if and to the extent otherwise exercisable by the Optionee at the time of death) may be exercised until the earlier of (i) one year from the date of the Termination of Service of the Optionee, or (ii) the date on which the term of the Option expires in accordance with Section 5.3(a).
(b) Subject to provisions of the Award Agreement, in the event the Optionee has a Termination of Service on account of death or Disability, the Option (whether or not otherwise exercisable) may be exercised until the earlier of (i) one year from the date of the Termination of Service of the Optionee, or (ii) the date on which the term of the Option expires in accordance with Section5.3.Section 5.3.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, if the Optionee has a Termination of Service by the Company for Cause, the Optionee’s Options, to the extent then unexercised, shall thereupon cease to be exercisable and shall be forfeited forthwith.
5.5Exercise of Options.
5.5 | Exercise of Options. |
(a) Subject to vesting, restrictions on exercisability and other restrictions provided for hereunder or otherwise imposed in accordance herewith, an Option may be exercised, and payment in full of the aggregate Option Price made, by an Optionee only by written notice (in the form prescribed by the Committee) to the Company specifying the number of Shares to be purchased.
APPENDIX A | A-9 |
(b) Without limiting the scope of the Committee’s discretion hereunder, the Committee may impose such other restrictions on the exercise of Incentive Stock Options (whether or not in the nature of the foregoing restrictions) as it may deem necessary or appropriate.
5.6Payment.
5.6 | Payment. |
(a) The aggregate Option Price shall be paid in full upon the exercise of the Option. Payment must be made by one of the following methods:
(i) a certified or bank cashier’s check or wire transfer;
(ii) subject to Section 13(e), the proceeds of a Company loan program or third-party sale program or a notice acceptable to the Committee given as consideration under such a program, in each case if permitted by the Committee in its discretion, if such a program has been established and the Optionee is eligible to participate therein;
(iii) if approved by the Committee in its discretion, Shares of previously owned Common Stock, which have been previously owned for more than six months, having an aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the aggregate Option Price; or
(iv) by any combination of such methods of payment or any other method acceptable to the Committee in its discretion.
(b) Except in the case of Options exercised by certified or bank cashier’s check, the Committee may impose limitations and prohibitions on the exercise of Options as it deems appropriate, including, without limitation, any limitation or prohibition designed to avoid accounting consequences which may result from the use of Common Stock as payment upon exercise of an Option.
(c) The Committee may provide that no Option may be exercised with respect to any fractional Share. Any fractional Shares resulting from an Optionee’s exercise that is accepted by the Company shall in the discretion of the Committee be paid in cash.
5.7Stock Appreciation Rights.
5.7 | Stock Appreciation Rights. |
The Committee, in its discretion, may also permit (taking into account, without limitation, the application of Section 409A of the Code, as the Committee may deem appropriate) the Optionee to elect to exercise an Option by receiving a combination of Shares and cash, or, in the discretion of the Committee, either Shares or solely in cash, with an aggregate Fair
A-8 SL Green Realty Corp.
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
Market Value (or, to the extent of payment in cash, in an amount) equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of the Shares with respect to which the Option is being exercised over the aggregate Option Price, as determined as of the day the Option is exercised. Such tandem Stock Appreciation Right shall expire at the same time as the Option to which it pertains expires.
5.8Exercise by Successors.
5.8 | Exercise by Successors. |
An Option may be exercised, and payment in full of the aggregate Option Price made, by the Successors of the Optionee only by written notice (in the form prescribed by the Committee) to the Company specifying the number of Shares to be purchased. Such notice shall state that the aggregate Option Price will be paid in full, or that the Option will be exercised as otherwise provided hereunder, in the discretion of the Company or the Committee, if and as applicable.
5.9Nontransferability of Option.
5.9 | Nontransferability of Option. |
Each Option granted under the Plan shall be nontransferable by the Optionee except by will or the laws of descent and distribution of the state wherein the Optionee is domiciled at the time of his death; provided, however, that the Committee may (but need not) permit other transfers, where the Committee concludes that such transferability (i) does not result in accelerated U.S. federal income taxation, (ii) does not cause any Option intended to be an Incentive Stock Option to fail to be described in Section 422(b) of the Code, and (iii) is otherwise appropriate and desirable; and provided, further, that in no event may an Option be transferred by the Optionee for consideration without shareholder approval.
5.10Table of ContentsCertain Incentive Stock Option Provisions.
A-10 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
5.10 | Certain Incentive Stock Option Provisions. |
(a) The aggregate Fair Market Value, determined as of the date an Option is granted, of the Common Stock for which any Optionee may be awarded Incentive Stock Options which are first exercisable by the Optionee during any calendar year under the Plan (or any other stock option plan required to be taken into account under Section 422(d) of the Code) shall not exceed $100,000.
(b) If Shares acquired upon exercise of an Incentive Stock Option are disposed of in a disqualifying disposition within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code by an Optionee prior to the expiration of either two years from the date of grant of such Option or one year from the transfer of Shares to the Optionee pursuant to the exercise of such Option, or in any other disqualifying disposition within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, such Optionee shall notify the Company in writing as soon as practicable thereafter of the date and terms of such disposition and, if the Company (or any affiliate thereof) thereupon has a tax-withholding obligation, shall pay to the Company (or such affiliate) an amount equal to any withholding tax the Company (or affiliate) is required to pay as a result of the disqualifying disposition.
(c) The Option Price with respect to each Incentive Stock Option shall not be less than 100%, or 110% in the case of an individual described in Section 422(b)(6) of the Code (relating to certain 10% owners), of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the day the Option is granted.
6. | PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO RESTRICTED STOCK. |
6.PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO RESTRICTED STOCK.
6.1Grant of Restricted Stock.
6.1 | Grant of Restricted Stock. |
(a) In connection with the grant of Restricted Stock, whether or not performance goals (as provided for under Section 11) apply thereto, the Committee shall establish one or more vesting periods with respect to the shares of Restricted Stock granted, the length of which shall be determined in the discretion of the Committee. Subject to the provisions of this Section 6, the applicable Award Agreement and the other provisions of the Plan, restrictions on Restricted Stock shall lapse if the Grantee satisfies all applicable employment or other service requirements through the end of the applicable vesting period. Nothing in this Section 6 shall limit the Committee’s authority, and the Committee is expressly authorized, to grant Shares which are fully vested upon grant (and for which there is no period of forfeiture), and which are subject to the rules of this Section 6.
(b) Subject to the other terms of the Plan, the Committee may, in its discretion as reflected by the terms of the applicable Award Agreement: (i) authorize the granting of Restricted Stock to Eligible Persons; (ii) provide a specified purchase price for the Restricted Stock (whether or not the payment of a purchase price is required by any state law applicable to the Company); (iii) determine the restrictions applicable to Restricted Stock and (iv) determine or impose other conditions, including any applicable performance goals, to the grant of Restricted Stock under the Plan as it may deem appropriate.
6.2Certificates.
6.2 | Certificates. |
(a) Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, each Grantee of Restricted Stock shall be issued a stock certificate in respect of Shares of Restricted Stock awarded under the Plan. Each such certificate shall be registered in the name of the Grantee. Without limiting the generality of Section 4(c), the certificates for Shares of Restricted Stock issued hereunder may include any legend which the Committee deems appropriate to reflect any restrictions on transfer hereunder
2016 Proxy Statement A-9
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
or under the Award Agreement, or as the Committee may otherwise deem appropriate, and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, shall bear a legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Award, substantially in the following form:
The transferability of this certificate and the shares of stock represented hereby are subject to the terms and conditions (including forfeiture) of the SL Green Realty Corp. FourthFifth Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and an Award Agreement entered into between the registered owner and SL Green Realty Corp. Copies of such Plan and Award Agreement are on file in the offices of SL Green Realty Corp., at 420 LexingtonOne Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, New York 10170.10017.
APPENDIX A | A-11 |
(b) The Committee may require that any stock certificates evidencing such Shares be held in custody by the Company until the restrictions hereunder shall have lapsed, and that, as a condition of any Award of Restricted Stock, the Grantee shall have delivered to the Company a stock power, endorsed in blank, relating to the stock covered by such Award. If and when such restrictions so lapse, the stock certificates shall be delivered by the Company to the Grantee or his or her designee as provided in Section 6.3 (and the stock power shall be so delivered or shall be discarded).
6.3Restrictions and Conditions.
6.3 | Restrictions and Conditions. |
Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, the Shares of Restricted Stock awarded pursuant to the Plan shall be subject to the following restrictions and conditions:
(i) Subject to the provisions of the Plan and the Award Agreements, during a period commencing with the date of such Award and ending on the date the period of forfeiture with respect to such Shares lapses, the Grantee shall not be permitted voluntarily or involuntarily to sell, transfer, pledge, anticipate, alienate, encumber or assign Shares of Restricted Stock awarded under the Plan (or have such Shares attached or garnished). Subject to the provisions of the Award Agreements and clause (iii) below, the period of forfeiture with respect to Shares granted hereunder shall lapse as provided in the applicable Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise expressly provided by the Committee, the period of forfeiture with respect to such Shares shall only lapse as to whole Shares.
(ii) Except as provided in the foregoing clause (i), below in this clause (ii), in Section 15, or as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, the Grantee shall have, in respect of the Shares of Restricted Stock, all of the rights of a shareholder of the Company, including the right to vote the Shares and the right to receive any cash dividends currently; provided, however that, if provided in an Award Agreement, cash dividends on such Shares shall (A) be held by the Company (unsegregated as a part of its general assets) until the period of forfeiture lapses (and forfeited if the underlying Shares are forfeited), and paid over to the Grantee (without interest) as soon as practicable after such period lapses (if not forfeited), or (B) treated as may otherwise be provided in an Award Agreement. Certificates for Shares (not subject to restrictions) shall be delivered to the Grantee or his or her designee, at the request thereof, promptly after, and only after, the period of forfeiture shall lapse without forfeiture in respect of such Shares of Restricted Stock.
(iii) Except as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, if the Grantee has a Termination of Service by the Company and its Subsidiaries for Cause, or by the Grantee for any reason, during the applicable period of forfeiture, then (A) all Shares still subject to restriction shall thereupon, and with no further action, be forfeited by the Grantee, and (B) in the event the Grantee has paid a cash purchase price for the forfeited Shares, the Company shall pay to the Grantee as soon as practicable (and in no event more than 30 days) after such termination an amount equal to the lesser of (x) the amount paid by the Grantee (if any) for such forfeited Restricted Stock as contemplated by Section 6.1, and (y) the Fair Market Value on the date of termination of the forfeited Restricted Stock.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, cash dividends on Shares of Restricted Stock that remain subject to potential forfeiture due to failure to meet performance-based conditions (i.e., conditions other than the continued service or employment of the Grantee through a certain date) must be retained by, or repaid by the Grantee to, the Company; provided that, to the extent provided for in the applicable Award Agreement or by the Committee, an amount equal to such cash dividends retained or repaid by the Grantee may be paid to the Grantee upon the lapsing of such performance-based conditions with respect to such shares.
7. | PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO PHANTOM SHARES. |
A-10 SL Green Realty Corp.
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
7.PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO PHANTOM SHARES.
7.1Grant of Phantom Shares.
7.1 | Grant of Phantom Shares. |
Subject to the other terms of the Plan, the Committee shall, in its discretion as reflected by the terms of the applicable Award Agreement: (i) authorize the granting of Phantom Shares to Eligible Persons and (ii) determine or impose other conditions to the grant of Phantom Shares under the Plan as it may deem appropriate.
A-12 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
7.2 | Term. |
The Committee may provide in an Award Agreement that any particular Phantom Share shall expire at the end of a specified term.
7.3Vesting.
7.3 | Vesting. |
Phantom Shares shall vest as provided in the applicable Award Agreement.
7.4Settlement of Phantom Shares.
7.4 | Settlement of Phantom Shares. |
(a) Each vested and outstanding Phantom Share shall be settled by the transfer to the Grantee of one Share; provided that the Committee at the time of grant may provide that a Phantom Share may be settled (i) in cash at the applicable Phantom Share Value or (ii) in cash or by transfer of Shares as elected by the Grantee in accordance with procedures established by the Committee (taking into account, without limitation, Section 409A of the Code, as the Committee may deem appropriate).
(b) Phantom Shares shall be settled with a single-sum payment by the Company; provided that, with respect to Phantom Shares of a Grantee which have a common Settlement Date, the Committee may permit the Grantee to elect in accordance with procedures established by the Committee (taking into account, without limitation, Section 409A of the Code, as the Committee may deem appropriate) to receive installment payments over a period not to exceed 10 years.
(c) (i) Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, the “Settlement Date” with respect to a Phantom Share is as soon as practicable after (but not later than the first day of the month to follow) the date on which the Phantom Share vests; provided that a Grantee may elect, in accordance with procedures to be established by the Committee, that such Settlement Date will be deferred as elected by the Grantee to as soon as practicable after (but not later than the first day of the month to follow) the Grantee’s Termination of Service, or such other time as may be permitted by the Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, elections under this Section 7.4(c)(i) must, except as may otherwise be permitted under the rules applicable under Section 409A of the Code, (A) be effective at least one year after they are made, or, in the case of payments to commence at a specific time, be made at least one year before the first scheduled payment and (B) defer the commencement of distributions for at least five years.
(ii) Notwithstanding Section 7.4(c)(i), the Committee may provide that distributions of Phantom Shares can be elected at any time in those cases in which the Phantom Share Value is determined by reference to Fair Market Value to the extent in excess of a base value, rather than by reference to unreduced Fair Market Value.
(iii) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Settlement Date, if not earlier pursuant to this Section 7.4(c), is the date of the Grantee’s death.
(d) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Section 7, in the event of a Change in Control, the Settlement Date shall be the date of such Change in Control and all amounts due with respect to Phantom Shares to a Grantee hereunder shall be paid as soon as practicable (but in no event more than 30 days) after such Change in Control, unless such Grantee elects otherwise in accordance with procedures established by the Committee.
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, a Grantee may receive any amounts to be paid in installments as provided in Section 7.4(b) or deferred by the Grantee as provided in Section 7.4(c) in the event of an “Unforeseeable Emergency.” For these purposes, an “Unforeseeable Emergency,” as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, is a severe financial hardship to the Grantee resulting from a sudden and unexpected illness or accident of the Grantee or “dependent,” as defined in Section 152(a) of the Code, of the Grantee, loss of the Grantee’s property due to casualty, or other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the Grantee. The circumstances that will constitute an Unforeseeable Emergency will depend upon the facts of each case, but, in any case, payment may not be made to the extent that such hardship is or may be relieved:
2016 Proxy Statement A-11
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
(i) through reimbursement or compensation by insurance or otherwise,
(ii) by liquidation of the Grantee’s assets, to the extent the liquidation of such assets would not itself cause severe financial hardship, or
APPENDIX A | A-13 |
(iii) by future cessation of the making of additional deferrals under Section7.4Section 7.4 (b) and (c).
Without limitation, the need to send a Grantee’s child to college or the desire to purchase a home shall not constitute an Unforeseeable Emergency. Distributions of amounts because of an Unforeseeable Emergency shall be permitted to the extent reasonably needed to satisfy the emergency need.
7.5Other Phantom Share Provisions.
7.5 | Other Phantom Share Provisions. |
(a) Rights to payments with respect to Phantom Shares granted under the Plan shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, attachment, garnishment, levy, execution, or other legal or equitable process, either voluntary or involuntary; and any attempt to anticipate, alienate, sell, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber, attach or garnish, or levy or execute on any right to payments or other benefits payable hereunder, shall be void.
(b) A Grantee may designate in writing, on forms to be prescribed by the Committee, a beneficiary or beneficiaries to receive any payments payable after his or her death and may amend or revoke such designation at any time. If no beneficiary designation is in effect at the time of a Grantee’s death, payments hereunder shall be made to the Grantee’s estate. If a Grantee with a vested Phantom Share dies, such Phantom Share shall be settled and the Phantom Share Value in respect of such Phantom Shares paid, and any payments deferred pursuant to an election under Section 7.4(c) shall be accelerated and paid, as soon as practicable (but no later than 60 days) after the date of death to such Grantee’s beneficiary or estate, as applicable.
(c) The Committee may establish a program under which distributions with respect to Phantom Shares may be deferred for periods in addition to those otherwise contemplated by foregoing provisions of this Section 7. Such program may include, without limitation, provisions for the crediting of earnings and losses on unpaid amounts, and, if permitted by the Committee, provisions under which Participants may select from among hypothetical investment alternatives for such deferred amounts in accordance with procedures established by the Committee.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 7, any fractional Phantom Share will be paid out in cash at the Phantom Share Value as of the Settlement Date.
(e) No Phantom Share shall be construed to give any Grantee any rights with respect to Shares or any ownership interest in the Company. Except as may be provided in accordance with Section 8, no provision of the Plan shall be interpreted to confer upon any Grantee any voting, dividend or derivative or other similar rights with respect to any Phantom Share.
7.6Claims Procedures.
7.6 | Claims Procedures. |
(a) To the extent that the Plan is determined by the Committee to be subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, the Grantee, or his beneficiary hereunder or authorized representative, may file a claim for payments with respect to Phantom Shares under the Plan by written communication to the Committee or its designee. A claim is not considered filed until such communication is actually received. Within 90 days (or, if special circumstances require an extension of time for processing, 180 days, in which case notice of such special circumstances should be provided within the initial 90-day period) after the filing of the claim, the Committee will either:
(i) approve the claim and take appropriate steps for satisfaction of the claim; or
(ii) if the claim is wholly or partially denied, advise the claimant of such denial by furnishing to him a written notice of such denial setting forth (A) the specific reason or reasons for the denial; (B) specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Plan on which the denial is based and, if the denial is based in whole or in part on any rule of construction or interpretation adopted by the Committee, a reference to such rule, a copy of which shall be provided to the claimant; (C) a description of any additional material or information necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of the reasons why such material or information is necessary; and (D) a reference to this Section 7.6 as the provision setting forth the claims procedure under the Plan.
(i) | approve the claim and take appropriate steps for satisfaction of the claim; or | |
(ii) | if the claim is wholly or partially denied, advise the claimant of such denial by furnishing to him a written notice of such denial setting forth (A) the specific reason or reasons for the denial; (B) specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Plan on which the denial is based and, if the denial is based in whole or in part on any rule of construction or interpretation adopted by the Committee, a reference to such rule, a copy of which shall be provided to the claimant; (C) a description of any additional material or information necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of the reasons why such material or information is necessary; and (D) a reference to this Section 7.6 as the provision setting forth the claims procedure under the Plan. |
(b) The claimant may request a review of any denial of his claim by written application to the Committee within 60 days after receipt of the notice of denial of such claim. Within 60 days (or, if special circumstances require an extension of time for processing, 120 days, in which case notice of such special circumstances should be provided within the
A-12 SL Green Realty Corp. initial
A-14 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
initial 60-day period) after receipt of written application for review, the Committee will provide the claimant with its decision in writing, including, if the claimant’s claim is not approved, specific reasons for the decision and specific references to the Plan provisions on which the decision is based.
8. | PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO DIVIDEND EQUIVALENT RIGHTS. |
8.PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO DIVIDEND EQUIVALENT RIGHTS.
8.1Grant of Dividend Equivalent Rights.
8.1 | Grant of Dividend Equivalent Rights. |
Subject to the other terms of the Plan, the Committee shall, in its discretion as reflected by the terms of the Award Agreements, authorize the granting of Dividend Equivalent Rights to Eligible Persons based on the regular cash dividends declared on Common Stock, to be credited as of the dividend payment dates, during the period between the date an Award is granted, and the date such Award is exercised, vests or expires, as determined by the Committee; provided, however, that in no event may a Dividend Equivalent Right be granted in connection with an Option or a Stock Appreciation Right. Such Dividend Equivalent Rights shall be converted to cash or additional Shares by such formula and at such time and subject to such limitation as may be determined by the Committee. If a Dividend Equivalent Right is granted in respect of an Award hereunder (other than an Option or Stock Appreciation Right), then, unless otherwise stated in the Award Agreement, in no event shall the Dividend Equivalent Right be in effect for a period beyond the time during which the applicable portion of the underlying Award is in effect.
8.2Certain Terms.
8.2 | Certain Terms. |
(a) The term of a Dividend Equivalent Right shall be set by the Committee in its discretion.
(b) Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, except as contemplated by Section 8.4, a Dividend Equivalent Right is exercisable or payable only while the Participant is an Eligible Person.
(c) Payment of the amount determined in accordance with Section 8.1 shall be in cash, in Common Stock or a combination of the both, as determined by the Committee.
(d) The Committee may impose such employment-related conditions on the grant of a Dividend Equivalent Right as it deems appropriate in its discretion.
(e) A Dividend Equivalent Right granted with respect to an Award subject to performance-based vesting, or forfeiture based on the failure to meet performance-based conditions (i.e., conditions other than the continued service or employment of the Grantee through a certain date), may not be exercisable or payable unless and until the performance-based conditions have been met.
8.3Other Types of Dividend Equivalent Rights.
8.3 | Other Types of Dividend Equivalent Rights. |
The Committee may establish a program under which Dividend Equivalent Rights of a type whether or not described in the foregoing provisions of this Section 8 may be granted to Participants. For example, and without limitation, the Committee may grant a dividend equivalent right with respect to a Phantom Share, which right would consist of the right (subject to Section 8.4) to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to the dividend distributions paid on a Share from time to time.
8.4Deferral.
8.4 | Deferral. |
The Committee may establish a program (taking into account, without limitation, the possible application of Section 409A of the Code, as the Committee may deem appropriate) under which Participants (i) will have Phantom Shares credited, subject to the terms of Sections 7.4 and 7.5 as though directly applicable with respect thereto, upon the granting of Dividend Equivalent Rights, or (ii) will have payments with respect to Dividend Equivalent Rights deferred. In the case of the foregoing clause (ii), such program may include, without limitation, provisions for the crediting of earnings and losses on unpaid amounts, and, if permitted by the Committee, provisions under which Participants may select from among hypothetical investment alternatives for such deferred amounts in accordance with procedures established by the Committee.
Table of Contents9.OTHER EQUITY-BASED AWARDS
APPENDIX A | A-15 |
9. | OTHER EQUITY-BASED AWARDS |
The Committee shall have the right (i) to grant other Awards based upon the Common Stock having such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine, including, without limitation, the grant of shares based upon certain conditions, the grant of convertible preferred shares, convertible debentures and other exchangeable or redeemable securities or equity interests, and the grant of stock appreciation rights, (ii) to grant limited-partnership or any other membership or ownership interests (which may be expressed as units or otherwise) in a Subsidiary or operating or other partnership (or other affiliate of the Company), with any Shares being issued in connection with the conversion of (or other distribution on
2016 Proxy Statement A-13
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
account of) an interest granted under the authority of this clause (ii) to be subject, for the avoidance of doubt, to Section 4 and the other provisions of the Plan, and (iii) to grant Awards valued by reference to book value, fair value or performance parameters relative to the Company or any Subsidiary or group of Subsidiaries. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any cash dividends or distributions otherwise payable pursuant to an Award granted pursuant to this Section 9 that remains subject to performance-based vesting, or forfeiture based on the failure to meet performance-based conditions (i.e., conditions other than the continued service or employment of the Grantee through a certain date), must be retained by, or repaid by the Grantee to, the Company or the applicable entity granting the Award; provided that, to the extent provided for in the applicable Award Agreement or by the Committee, an amount equal to such cash dividends or distributions retained or repaid by the Grantee may be paid to the Grantee upon the satisfaction or lapsing of such performance-based conditions with respect to such Award.
10. | CASH-BASED AWARDS. |
Grant of Cash-Based Awards.Awards. The Committee shall have the right to grant Cash-Based Awards under the Plan. A Cash-Based Award is an Award that entitles the Grantee to a payment in cash. Each Cash-Based Award shall specify a cash-denominated payment amount, formula or payment ranges as determined by the Committee. Payment, if any, with respect to a Cash-Based Award shall be made in accordance with the terms of the Award and shall be made in cash.
11. | PERFORMANCE GOALS. |
The Committee, in its discretion, (i) may establish one or more performance goals as a precondition to the issuance or vesting of Awards, and (ii) may provide, in connection with the establishment of the performance goals, for predetermined Awards to those Participants (who continue to meet all applicable eligibility requirements) with respect to whom the applicable performance goals are satisfied. In the case of any grant intended to qualify as performance based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code (including, for these purposes, grants constituting performance based compensation, as determined without regard to certain shareholder approval and disclosure requirements by virtue of an applicable transition rule), the Committee (i) may use one or a combination of the performance goals set forth in this Section 11; and (ii) may establish other goals (with shareholder approval of other types of goals) intended to be performance goals as contemplated by Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations thereunder. Performance-Based Awards intended to qualify as “performance based” compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, may be payable upon the attainment of objective performance goals that are established by the Committee and relate to one or more Performance Criteria, in each case on specified date or over any period, up to 10 years, as determined by the Committee. Performance Criteria may (but need not) be based on the achievement of the specified levels of performance under one or more of the measures set out below relative to the performance of one or more other corporations or indices. Performance goals may be absolute amounts or percentages of amounts or may be relative to the performance of other companies or of indexes. Except as otherwise expressly provided, all financial terms are used as defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and all determinations shall be made in accordance with GAAP, as applied by the Company in the preparation of its periodic reports to shareholders. To the extent permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code, unless the Committee provides otherwise at the time of establishing the performance goals, for each fiscal year of the Company, the Committee may provide for objectively determinable adjustments, as determined in accordance with GAAP, to any of the Performance Criteria described above for one or more of the items of gain, loss, profit or expense: (A) determined to be extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence, (B) related to the disposal of a segment of a business, (C) related to a change in accounting principle under GAAP, (D) related to discontinued operations that do not qualify as a segment of a business under GAAP, and (E) attributable to the business operations of any entity acquired by the Company during the fiscal year.
Table of Contents12.TAX WITHHOLDING.
A-16 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
12. | TAX WITHHOLDING. |
12.1In General.
12.1 | In General. |
The Company shall be entitled to withhold from any payments or deemed payments any amount of tax withholding determined by the Committee to be required by law. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee may, in its discretion, require the Participant to pay to the Company at such time as the Committee determines the amount that the Committee deems necessary to satisfy the Company’s obligation to withhold federal, state or local income or other taxes incurred by reason of (i) the exercise of any Option, (ii) the lapsing of any restrictions applicable to any Restricted Stock, (iii) the receipt of a distribution in respect of Phantom Shares or Dividend Equivalent Rights or receipt of cash or (iv) any other applicable income-recognition event (for example, an election under Section 83(b) of the Code).
12.2Share Withholding.
12.2 | Share Withholding. |
(a) Upon exercise of an Option, the Optionee may, if approved by the Committee in its discretion, make a written election to have Shares then issued withheld by the Company from the Shares otherwise to be received, or to deliver previously owned Shares, in order to satisfy the liability for the minimum withholding taxes due. Alternatively, if so provided in an Award Agreement, the Committee may require the Optionee to satisfy such liability by having Shares then
A-14 SL Green Realty Corp.
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
issued withheld by the Company from the Shares otherwise to be received, or require the Optionee to do so, subject to the Optionee’s ability to elect to satisfy such liability in cash. In the event that the Optionee is to satisfy such liability in Shares, the number of Shares so withheld or delivered shall have an aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of exercise sufficient to satisfy the applicable minimum withholding taxes. Where the exercise of an Option does not give rise to an obligation by the Company to withhold federal, state or local income or other taxes on the date of exercise, but may give rise to such an obligation in the future, the Committee may, in its discretion, make such arrangements and impose such requirements as it deems necessary or appropriate.
(b) Upon lapsing of restrictions on Restricted Stock (or other income-recognition event), the Grantee may, if approved by the Committee in its discretion, make a written election to have Shares withheld by the Company from the Shares otherwise to be released from restriction, or to deliver previously owned Shares (not subject to restrictions hereunder), in order to satisfy the liability for the minimum withholding taxes due. Alternatively, if so provided in an Award Agreement, the Committee may require the Grantee to satisfy such liability by having Shares withheld by the Company from the Shares otherwise to be released from restriction, or require the Grantee to do so, subject to the Grantee’s ability to elect to satisfy such liability in cash. In the event that the Grantee is to satisfy such liability in Shares, the number of Shares so withheld or delivered shall have an aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of the lapsing of restrictions (or other income-recognition event) sufficient to satisfy the applicable minimum withholding taxes.
(c) Upon the making of a distribution in respect of Phantom Shares or Dividend Equivalent Rights, the Grantee may, if approved by the Committee in its discretion, make a written election to have amounts (which may include Shares) withheld by the Company from the distribution otherwise to be made, or to deliver previously owned Shares (not subject to restrictions hereunder), in order to satisfy the liability for the minimum withholding taxes due. Alternatively, if so provided in an Award Agreement, the Committee may require the Grantee to satisfy such liability by having Shares withheld by the Company from the distribution otherwise to be made, or require the Grantee to do so, subject to the Grantee’s ability to elect to satisfy such liability in cash. In the event that the Grantee is to satisfy such liability in Shares, any Shares so withheld or delivered shall have an aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of distribution sufficient to satisfy the applicable minimum withholding taxes.
(d) Upon the occurrence of any other income-recognition event with respect to an Award granted under the Plan that occurs upon or concurrently with the issuance or vesting of, or lapsing of restrictions on, Common Stock, the Grantee may, if approved by the Committee in its discretion, make a written election to have Shares withheld by the Company from the Shares otherwise to be issued, vested or released from restriction, or to deliver previously owned Shares (not subject to restrictions hereunder), in order to satisfy the liability for the minimum withholding taxes due. Alternatively, if so provided in an Award Agreement, the Committee may require the Grantee to satisfy such liability by having Shares withheld by the Company from the Shares otherwise to be issued, vested or released from restriction, or require the Grantee to do so, subject to the Grantee’s ability to elect to satisfy such liability in cash. In the event that the Grantee is to satisfy such liability in Shares, the number of Shares so withheld or delivered shall have an aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of such income-recognition event sufficient to satisfy the applicable minimum withholding taxes.
APPENDIX A | A-17 |
(e) For purposes of determining the number of Shares to be withheld or delivered to satisfy the applicable minimum withholding taxes pursuant to Section 12.2 of the Plan, the Fair Market Value of the Shares shall be calculated in the same manner as the Shares are valued for purposes of determining the amount of withholding taxes due.
(f) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, the Company may withhold shares in excess of the applicable minimum withholding taxes if doing so would not cause the Plan to be subject to liability accounting under FASB ASC 718 (or any successor rule).
12.3Withholding Required.
12.3 | Withholding Required. |
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Plan or the Award Agreement to the contrary, the Participant’s satisfaction of any tax-withholding requirements imposed by the Committee shall be a condition precedent to the Company’s obligation as may otherwise be provided hereunder to provide Shares to the Participant and to the release of any restrictions as may otherwise be provided hereunder, as applicable; and the applicable Option, Restricted Stock, Phantom Shares, Dividend Equivalent Rights or other Award shall be forfeited upon the failure of the Participant to satisfy such requirements with respect to, as applicable, (i) the exercise of the Option, (ii) the lapsing of restrictions on the Restricted Stock (or other income-recognition event), (iii) distributions in respect of any Phantom Share or Dividend Equivalent Right or receipt of cash or (iv) any other income-recognition event with respect an Award granted under the Plan.
2016 Proxy Statement A-15
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
13. | REGULATIONS AND APPROVALS. |
(a) The obligation of the Company to sell Shares with respect to an Award granted under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including all applicable federal and state securities laws, and the obtaining of all such approvals by governmental agencies as may be deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee.
(b) The Committee may make such changes to the Plan as may be necessary or appropriate to comply with the rules and regulations of any government authority or to obtain tax benefits applicable to an Award.
(c) Each grant of Options, Restricted Stock, Phantom Shares (or issuance of Shares in respect thereof) or Dividend Equivalent Rights (or issuance of Shares in respect thereof), or other Award under Section 9 (or issuance of Shares in respect thereof), is subject to the requirement that, if at any time the Committee determines, in its discretion, that the listing, registration or qualification of Shares issuable pursuant to the Plan is required by any securities exchange or under any state or federal law, or the consent or approval of any governmental regulatory body is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the issuance of Options, Shares of Restricted Stock, Phantom Shares, Dividend Equivalent Rights, other Awards or other Shares, no payment shall be made, or Phantom Shares or Shares issued or grant of Restricted Stock or other Award made, in whole or in part, unless listing, registration, qualification, consent or approval has been effected or obtained free of any conditions in a manner acceptable to the Committee.
(d) In the event that the disposition of stock acquired pursuant to the Plan is not covered by a then current registration statement under the Securities Act, and is not otherwise exempt from such registration, such Shares shall be restricted against transfer to the extent required under the Securities Act, and the Committee may require any individual receiving Shares pursuant to the Plan, as a condition precedent to receipt of such Shares, to represent to the Company in writing that such Shares are acquired for investment only and not with a view to distribution and that such Shares will be disposed of only if registered for sale under the Securities Act or if there is an available exemption for such disposition.
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Company shall not be required to take or permit any action under the Plan or any Award Agreement which, in the good-faith determination of the Company, would result in a material risk of a violation by the Company of Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act.
14.INTERPRETATION AND AMENDMENTS; OTHER RULES.
14. | INTERPRETATION AND AMENDMENTS; OTHER RULES. |
The Committee may make such rules and regulations and establish such procedures for the administration of the Plan as it deems appropriate. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee may (i) determine the extent, if any, to which Options, Phantom Shares or Shares (whether or not Shares of Restricted Stock) or Dividend Equivalent Rights shall be forfeited (whether or not such forfeiture is expressly contemplated hereunder); (ii) interpret the Plan and the Award Agreements hereunder, with such interpretations to be conclusive and binding on all persons and otherwise accorded the maximum deference permitted by law, provided that the Committee’s interpretation shall not be entitled to deference
A-18 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
on and after a Change in Control except to the extent that such interpretations are made exclusively by members of the Committee who are individuals who served as Committee members before the Change in Control; and (iii) take any other actions and make any other determinations or decisions that it deems necessary or appropriate in connection with the Plan or the administration or interpretation thereof. In the event of any dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation of the Plan or of any rule, regulation or procedure, or as to any question, right or obligation arising from or related to the Plan, the decision of the Committee, except as provided in clause (ii) of the foregoing sentence, shall be final and binding upon all persons. The Committee may, in its discretion, delegate the authority and responsibility to act pursuant to the Plan with respect to ministerial administrative matters, which actions shall at all times be subject to the supervision of the Committee, and the actions of such a delegee in accordance with the foregoing shall be considered the actions of the Committee hereunder. Unless otherwise expressly provided hereunder, the Committee, with respect to any grant, may exercise its discretion hereunder at the time of the Award or thereafter. The Board may amend the Plan as it shall deem advisable, except that no amendment may adversely affect a Participant with respect to an Award previously granted unless such amendments are required in order to comply with applicable laws. The Board, in its discretion, may determine to make any Plan amendments subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders for purposes of complying with applicable stock exchange requirements, ensuring that compensation earned under Awards qualifies as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code or ensuring that Incentive Stock Options granted under the Plan are qualified under Section 422 of the Code. Except as provided in Section 15(a) or (f), without prior stockholder approval, in no event may the Board exercise its discretion to reduce the Option Price of outstanding Options or Stock Appreciation Rights or cancel, exchange, substitute, buyout or surrender outstanding Options or Stock Appreciation Rights in exchange for cash, other awards or Options or Stock Appreciation Rights with an Option Price that is less than the Option Price of the original Options or Stock Appreciation Rights.
A-16 SL Green Realty Corp.
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
15.CHANGES IN CAPITAL STRUCTURE.
15. | CHANGES IN CAPITAL STRUCTURE. |
(a) If (i) the Company or its Subsidiaries shall at any time be involved in a merger, consolidation, dissolution, liquidation, reorganization, exchange of shares, sale of all or substantially all of the assets or stock of the Company or its Subsidiaries or a transaction similar thereto, (ii) any stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, stock combination, reclassification, recapitalization or other similar change in the capital structure of the Company or its Subsidiaries, or any distribution to holders of Common Stock other than cash dividends, shall occur or (iii) any other event shall occur which in the judgment of the Committee necessitates action by way of adjusting the terms of the outstanding Awards, then:
(x) the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be made subject to Options and Dividend Equivalent Rights under the Plan, the maximum aggregate number and kind of Shares of Restricted Stock that may be granted under the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Phantom Shares and other Awards which may be granted under the Plan, shall be appropriately adjusted by the Committee; and
(y) with respect to Awards issued under the Plan, the Committee shall take any such action as shall be necessary to maintain each Participants’ rights hereunder (including under their Award Agreements) with respect to Options, Phantom Shares and Dividend Equivalent Rights (and, as appropriate, other Awards under Section 9), so that they are substantially proportionate to the rights existing in such Options, Phantom Shares and Dividend Equivalent Rights (and other Awards under Section 9) prior to such event, including, without limitation, adjustments in (A) the number of Options, Phantom Shares and Dividend Equivalent Rights (and other Awards under Section 9) granted, (B) the number and kind of shares or other property to be distributed in respect of Options, Phantom Shares and Dividend Equivalent Rights (and other Awards under Section 9 as applicable), (C) the Option Price and Phantom Share Value, and (D) performance-based criteria established in connection with Awards; provided that, the foregoing clause (D) shall also be applied in the case of any event relating to a Subsidiary if the event would have been covered under this Section 15(a) had the event related to the Company. For purposes of clause (x) and this clause (y), the manner in which any of the above described adjustments are made shall in all events be subject to approval of the Committee.
To the extent that such action shall include an increase or decrease in the number of Shares (or units of other property then available) subject to all outstanding Awards, the number of Shares (or units) available under Section 4 shall be increased or decreased, as the case may be, proportionately, as may be determined by the Committee.
(b) Any Shares or other securities distributed to a Grantee with respect to Restricted Stock or otherwise issued in substitution of Restricted Stock shall be subject to the restrictions and requirements imposed by Section 6, including depositing the certificates therefor with the Company together with a stock power and bearing a legend as provided in Section 6.2(a).
APPENDIX A | A-19 |
(c) If the Company shall be consolidated or merged with another corporation or other entity, each Grantee who has received Restricted Stock that is then subject to restrictions imposed by Section 6.3(a) may be required to deposit with the successor corporation the certificates, if any, for the stock or securities or the other property that the Grantee is entitled to receive by reason of ownership of Restricted Stock in a manner consistent with Section 6.2(b), and such stock, securities or other property shall become subject to the restrictions and requirements imposed by Section 6.3(a), and the certificates therefor or other evidence thereof shall bear a legend similar in form and substance to the legend set forth in Section 6.2(a).
(d) If a Change in Control shall occur, then the Committee, as constituted immediately before the Change in Control, may make such adjustments as it, in its discretion, determines are necessary or appropriate in light of the Change in Control, provided that the Committee determines that such adjustments do not have an adverse economic impact on the Participant as determined at the time of the adjustments.
(e) The judgment of the Committee with respect to any matter referred to in this Section 15 shall be conclusive and binding upon each Participant without the need for any amendment to the Plan.
(f) Upon the effective time of a Sale Event, with respect to Awards granted on or after December 9, 2009, at the election of the Committee, either (i) (A) such Options and Stock Appreciation Rights that are not exercisable immediately prior to the effective time of the Sale Event shall become fully exercisable as of the effective time of the Sale Event, (B) all such other Awards with time-based vesting, conditions or restrictions shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable as of the effective time of the Sale Event, (C) all such Awards with conditions and restrictions relating to the attainment of performance goals may become vested and nonforfeitable in connection with a Sale Event in the Committee’s discretion (to the extent not provided for in the Award) and (D) all such outstanding Awards shall terminate or (ii) such Awards shall be assumed by the successor entity and continue with appropriate adjustment pursuant to Section 15(a) above. In the event of the termination of Awards pursuant to clause (i) of the prior sentence, (i) the Company shall have the option (in its sole discretion) to make or provide for a cash payment to the grantees holding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, in exchange for the cancellation
2016 Proxy Statement A-17
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
thereof, in an amount equal to the difference between (A) the Sale Price multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights (to the extent then exercisable (after taking into account any acceleration hereunder) at prices not in excess of the Sale Price) and (B) the aggregate exercise price of all such outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights; or (ii) each grantee shall be permitted, within a specified period of time prior to the consummation of the Sale Event as determined by the Committee, to exercise all outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights held by such grantee effective as of the effective time of such Sale Event. For purposes of the Plan, (i) “Sale Event” shall mean (A) the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company on a consolidated basis to an unrelated person or entity, (B) a merger, reorganization or consolidation in which the outstanding shares of Common Stock are converted into or exchanged for securities of the successor entity and the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior to such merger, reorganization or consolidation would represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) less than 50% of the total voting power of the voting securities of the surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger, reorganization or consolidation or cease to have the power to elect at least a majority of the board of directors or other governing body of such surviving entity, or (C) the sale of all of the Common Stock of the Company to an unrelated person or entity and (ii) “Sale Price” shall mean the value as determined by the Committee of the consideration payable, or otherwise to be received by stockholders, per share of Common Stock pursuant to a Sale Event.
16.1No Rights to Employment or Other Service.
16. | MISCELLANEOUS. | |
16.1 | No Rights to Employment or Other Service. |
Nothing in the Plan or in any grant made pursuant to the Plan shall confer on any individual any right to continue in the employ or other service of the Company or its Subsidiaries or interfere in any way with the right of the Company or its Subsidiaries and its shareholders to terminate the individual’s employment or other service at any time.
16.2Right of First Refusal; Right of Repurchase.
16.2 | Right of First Refusal; Right of Repurchase. |
At the time of grant, the Committee may provide in connection with any grant made under the Plan that Shares received hereunder shall be subject to a right of first refusal pursuant to which the Company shall be entitled to purchase such Shares in the event of a prospective sale of the Shares, subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may specify
A-20 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
at the time of grant or (if permitted by the Award Agreement) thereafter, and to a right of repurchase, pursuant to which the Company shall be entitled to purchase such Shares at a price determined by, or under a formula set by, the Committee at the time of grant or (if permitted by the Award Agreement) thereafter.
16.3No Fiduciary Relationship.
16.3 | No Fiduciary Relationship. |
Nothing contained in the Plan (including without limitation Sections 7.5(c) and 8.4), and no action taken pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, shall create or shall be construed to create a trust of any kind, or a fiduciary relationship between the Company or its Subsidiaries, or their officers or the Committee, on the one hand, and the Participant, the Company, its Subsidiaries or any other person or entity, on the other.
16.4No Fund Created.
16.4 | No Fund Created. |
Any and all payments hereunder to any Participant under the Plan shall be made from the general funds of the Company (or, if applicable, a Participating Company), no special or separate fund shall be established or other segregation of assets made to assure such payments, and the Phantom Shares (including for purposes of this Section 16.4 any accounts established to facilitate the implementation of Section 7.4(c)) and any other similar devices issued hereunder to account for Plan obligations do not constitute Common Stock and shall not be treated as (or as giving rise to) property or as a trust fund of any kind; provided, however, that the Company may establish a mere bookkeeping reserve to meet its obligations hereunder or a trust or other funding vehicle that would not cause the Plan to be deemed to be funded for tax purposes or for purposes of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The obligations of the Company under the Plan are unsecured and constitute a mere promise by the Company to make benefit payments in the future and, to the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payments under the Plan from the Company, such right shall be no greater than the right of a general unsecured creditor of the Company. (If any affiliate of the Company is or is made responsible with respect to any Awards, the foregoing sentence shall apply with respect to such affiliate.) Without limiting the foregoing, Phantom Shares and any other similar devices issued hereunder to account for Plan obligations are solely a device for the measurement and determination of the amounts to be paid to a Grantee under the Plan, and each Grantee’s right in the Phantom Shares and any such other devices is limited to the right to receive payment, if any, as may herein be provided.
A-18 SL Green Realty Corp.
APPENDIX A: SL GREEN REALTY CORP. FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
16.5Notices.
16.5 | Notices. |
All notices under the Plan shall be in writing, and if to the Company, shall be delivered to the Board or mailed to its principal office, addressed to the attention of the Board; and if to the Participant, shall be delivered personally, sent by facsimile transmission or mailed to the Participant at the address appearing in the records of the Company. Such addresses may be changed at any time by written notice to the other party given in accordance with this Section 16.5.
16.6Exculpation and Indemnification.
16.6 | Exculpation and Indemnification. |
The Company shall indemnify and hold harmless the members of the Board and the members of the Committee from and against any and all liabilities, costs and expenses incurred by such persons as a result of any act or omission to act in connection with the performance of such person’s duties, responsibilities and obligations under the Plan, to the maximum extent permitted by law.
16.7Captions.
16.7 | Captions. |
The use of captions in this Plan is for convenience. The captions are not intended to provide substantive rights.
16.8Governing Law.
16.8 | Governing Law. |
THE PLAN SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF MARYLAND WITHOUT REFERENCE TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS.
16.9Clawback Policy.
16.9 | Clawback Policy. |
Awards under this Plan shall be subject to the Company’s clawback policy, as in effect from time to time.
2016 Proxy Statement A-19
B-1
INFORMATION REGARDING CERTAIN FINANCIAL MEASURES
Below are reconciliations of income from continuing operations before equity in net income of unconsolidated joint ventures, noncontrolling interestsattributable to our stockholders to Funds from Operations, or FFO, per share and discontinued operations to operating income and combined same-store cash net operating incomeFunds Available for Distribution for the yearstwelve months ended December31, 2015and2014, the years ended December31, 2014and2013and the years ended December31, 2013and December31, 2012(amountsDecember 31, 2021 (amounts in thousands, except per share data).
Reconciliation of 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Properties | SL Green’s share of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Combined | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
before equity in net income from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
unconsolidated joint ventures, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
equity in net gain on sale of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
interest in unconsolidated joint | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
venture/real estate, gain (loss) on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sale of investment in marketable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
securities, purchase price fair value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustment and loss on early | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
extinguishment of debt | $ | 77,261 | $ | 174,963 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity in net income from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
unconsolidated joint ventures | 13,028 | 26,537 | 13,028 | 26,537 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 560,887 | 371,610 | 62,766 | 60,692 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
net of interest income | 323,870 | 317,400 | 70,018 | 61,556 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
financing costs | 27,348 | 22,377 | 5,770 | 6,008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | (49 | ) | (32,365 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 1,002,345 | $ | 880,522 | $ | 151,582 | $ | 154,793 | ||||||||||||||||
Marketing, general & | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
administrative expense | 94,873 | 92,488 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
discontinued operations | 488 | 37,790 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction related costs, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
net of recoveries | 11,430 | 8,707 | 37 | 372 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-building revenue | (195,944 | ) | (217,857 | ) | (25,690 | ) | (17,467 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity in income from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
unconsolidated joint ventures | (13,028 | ) | (26,537 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 49 | 32,365 | 497 | 3,382 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income (NOI) | 900,213 | 807,478 | 126,426 | 141,080 | $ | 1,026,639 | $ | 948,558 | ||||||||||||||||
NOI from discontinued operations | (488 | ) | (37,790 | ) | — | — | (488 | ) | (37,790 | ) | ||||||||||||||
NOI from other properties/affiliates | (210,584 | ) | (114,361 | ) | (44,943 | ) | (62,229 | ) | (255,527 | ) | (176,590 | ) | ||||||||||||
Same-Store NOI | $ | 689,141 | $ | 655,327 | $ | 81,483 | $ | 78,851 | $ | 770,624 | $ | 734,178 | ||||||||||||
Ground lease straight-line | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustment | 1,595 | 1,602 | — | — | 1,595 | 1,602 | ||||||||||||||||||
Straight-line and free rent | (57,615 | ) | (46,210 | ) | (5,829 | ) | (7,471 | ) | (63,444 | ) | (53,681 | ) | ||||||||||||
Rental income—FAS141 | (12,296 | ) | (16,377 | ) | (1,512 | ) | (1,607 | ) | (13,808 | ) | (17,984 | ) | ||||||||||||
Same-store cash NOI | $ | 620,825 | $ | 594,342 | $ | 74,142 | $ | 69,773 | $ | 694,967 | $ | 664,115 |
B-1 SL Green Realty Corp.
Twelve months ended December 31, 2021 | ||||
FFO / Funds Available for Distribution Reconciliation: | ||||
Net income attributable to SL Green common stockholders | $ | 434,804 | ||
Add: | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 216,869 | |||
Joint venture depreciation and noncontrolling interest adjustments | 249,087 | |||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 23,573 | |||
Less: | ||||
Gain on sale of real estate and discontinued operations, net | 287,417 | |||
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate | (32,757) | |||
Purchase price and other fair value adjustments | 209,443 | |||
Depreciable real estate reserves and impairment | (23,794) | |||
Depreciation on non-rental real estate assets | 2,790) | |||
Funds From Operations attributable to SL Green common stockholders and noncontrolling interests | $ | 481,234 | ||
Add: | ||||
Non real estate depreciation and amortization | 2,790 | |||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 11,424 | |||
Non-cash deferred compensation | 54,175 | |||
FAD adjustment for Joint Ventures | (94,506 | |||
Straight-line rental income and other non cash adjustments | (12,159) | |||
Second cycle tenant improvements | (28,350) | |||
Second cycle leasing commissions | (7,872) | |||
Revenue enhancing recurring CAPEX | (2,503) | |||
Non-revenue enhancing recurring CAPEX | (23,523) | |||
Funds Available for Distribution | $ | 380,710 | ||
Basic ownership interest: | ||||
Weighted average REIT common share and common share equivalents (1) | 65,740 | |||
Weighted average partnership units held by noncontrolling interests | 3,987 | |||
Basic weighted average shares and units outstanding (1) | 69,727 |
B-2 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
Diluted ownership interest: | ||||
Weighted average REIT common share and common share equivalents(1) | 66,782 | |||
Weighted average partnership units held by noncontrolling interests | 3,987 | |||
Diluted weighted average shares and units outstanding(1) | 70,769 | |||
Pro forma adjustment(2) | 1,794 | |||
Pro forma diluted weighted average shares and units outstanding(2) | 72,563 | |||
FFO per share: | ||||
Basic(1) | $ | 6.88 | ||
Diluted(1) | 6.80 | |||
Pro forma(2) | 6.63 |
APPENDIX B: INFORMATION REGARDING CERTAIN FINANCIAL MEASURES
(1) | During the first quarter of 2022, the Company completed a reverse stock split to mitigate the dilutive impact of stock issued for a special dividend paid primarily in stock. This share-related data has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split. |
(2) | During the first quarter of 2022, the Company completed a reverse stock split and a special dividend paid primarily in stock. GAAP requires the weighted average common shares outstanding to be retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to reflect the reverse stock split. However, GAAP requires shares issued pursuant to the special dividend be included in diluted weighted average common shares outstanding only from the date on which the special dividend was declared. To facilitate comparison between the periods presented, the Company calculated Pro forma diluted weighted average shares and units outstanding, which includes the shares issued pursuant to the special dividend from the beginning of the 2021 reporting periods. |
ReconciliationBelow are reconciliations of 2014 and 2013
Consolidated Properties | SL Green’s share of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Combined | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
before equity in net income from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
unconsolidated joint ventures, equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
in net gain on sale of interest in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
unconsolidated joint venture/real | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
estate, gain (loss) on sale of investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
in marketable securities, purchase price | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
fair value adjustment and loss on early | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
extinguishment of debt | $ | 174,963 | $ | 118,062 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||
Equity in net income from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
unconsolidated joint ventures | 26,537 | 9,921 | 26,537 | 9,921 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 371,610 | 324,461 | 60,691 | 84,403 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of interest income | 317,400 | 310,894 | 61,556 | 79,896 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
financing costs | 22,377 | 15,855 | 6,008 | 9,637 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | (32,365 | ) | (18,518 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 880,522 | $ | 760,675 | $ | 154,792 | $ | 183,857 | ||||||||||||||||
Marketing, general & | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
administrative expense | 92,488 | 86,192 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
discontinued operations | 37,790 | 64,906 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loan loss and other investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
reserves, net of recoveries | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction related costs, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
net of recoveries | 8,707 | 3,985 | 372 | 356 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-building revenue | (217,856 | ) | (201,416 | ) | (17,467 | ) | (18,451 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity in income from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
unconsolidated joint ventures | (26,537 | ) | (9,921 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 32,365 | 18,518 | 3,382 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income (NOI) | 807,479 | 722,939 | 141,079 | 165,762 | $ | 948,558 | $ | 888,701 | ||||||||||||||||
NOI from discontinued operations | (37,790 | ) | (64,906 | ) | — | — | (37,790 | ) | (64,906 | ) | ||||||||||||||
NOI from other properties/affiliates | (111,992 | ) | (22,437 | ) | (54,941 | ) | (87,906 | ) | (166,933 | ) | (110,343 | ) | ||||||||||||
Same-Store NOI | $ | 657,697 | $ | 635,596 | $ | 86,138 | $ | 77,856 | $ | 743,835 | $ | 713,452 | ||||||||||||
Ground lease straight-line adjustment | 1,602 | 1,143 | — | — | 1,602 | 1,143 | ||||||||||||||||||
Straight-line and free rent | (47,886 | ) | (40,357 | ) | (8,404 | ) | (9,645 | ) | (56,290 | ) | (50,002 | ) | ||||||||||||
Rental income—FAS141 | (21,578 | ) | (18,956 | ) | (1,990 | ) | (2,257 | ) | (23,568 | ) | (21,213 | ) | ||||||||||||
Same-store cash NOI | $ | 589,835 | $ | 577,426 | $ | 75,744 | $ | 65,954 | $ | 665,579 | $ | 643,380 |
2016Proxy Statement B-2
APPENDIX B: INFORMATION REGARDING CERTAIN FINANCIAL MEASURES
Reconciliation of 2013 and 2012
Consolidated Properties | SL Green’s share of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Combined | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
before equity in net income from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
unconsolidated joint ventures, equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
in net gain on sale of interest in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
unconsolidated joint venture/real | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
estate, gain (loss) on sale of investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
in marketable securities, purchase price | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
fair value adjustment and loss (gain) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
on early extinguishment of debt | $ | 142,024 | $ | 79,021 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||
Equity in net income from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
unconsolidated joint ventures | 9,921 | 76,418 | 9,921 | 76,418 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 337,692 | 325,737 | 84,403 | 69,108 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
net of interest income | 330,215 | 329,897 | 79,896 | 86,268 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
financing costs | 16,695 | 19,450 | 9,637 | 3,859 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on early | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
extinguishment of debt | (18,518 | ) | (6,978 | ) | — | 10,711 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 818,029 | $ | 823,545 | $ | 183,857 | $ | 246,364 | ||||||||||||||||
Marketing, general & | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
administrative expense | 86,192 | 82,840 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
discontinued operations | 7,548 | 11,849 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loan loss and other investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
reserves, net of recoveries | — | 564 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction related costs, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
net of recoveries | 3,987 | 5,625 | 356 | 960 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-building revenue | (201,416 | ) | (134,391 | ) | (18,451 | ) | (83,242 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity in net income from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
unconsolidated joint ventures | (9,921 | ) | (76,418 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on early | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
extinguishment of debt | 18,518 | 6,978 | — | (10,711 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income (NOI) | 722,937 | 720,592 | 165,762 | 153,371 | $ | 888,699 | $ | 873,963 | ||||||||||||||||
NOI from discontinued operations | (7,548 | ) | (11,849 | ) | — | — | (7,548 | ) | (11,849 | ) | ||||||||||||||
NOI from other properties/affiliates | (59,448 | ) | (54,403 | ) | (64,861 | ) | (56,296 | ) | (124,309 | ) | (110,699 | ) | ||||||||||||
Same-Store NOI | $ | 655,941 | $ | 654,340 | $ | 100,901 | $ | 97,075 | $ | 756,842 | $ | 751,415 | ||||||||||||
Ground lease straight-line adjustment | 5,645 | 2,702 | — | — | 5,645 | 2,702 | ||||||||||||||||||
Straight-line and free rent | (47,963 | ) | (56,249 | ) | (3,186 | ) | (2,842 | ) | (51,149 | ) | (59,091 | ) | ||||||||||||
Rental income— FAS141 | (5,154 | ) | (10,317 | ) | (2,525 | ) | (1,411 | ) | (7,679 | ) | (11,728 | ) | ||||||||||||
Same-store cash NOI | $ | 608,469 | $ | 590,476 | $ | 95,190 | $ | 92,822 | $ | 703,659 | $ | 683,298 |
B-3 SL Green Realty Corp.
APPENDIX B: INFORMATION REGARDING CERTAIN FINANCIAL MEASURES
Notes:
The Company presentsnet income to operating income, net operating income, same-store cash net operating income and same-store cash net operating income excluding lease termination income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (amounts in thousands).
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2021 | 2020 | |||||||
Operating Income and Same-store NOI Reconciliation | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 480,632 | 414,758 | |||||
Equity in net loss (gain) on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate | 32,757 | (2,961) | ||||||
Purchase price and other fair value adjustments | (210,070) | (187,522) | ||||||
Gain on sale of real estate, net | (287,417) | (215,506) | ||||||
Depreciable real estate reserves and impairment | 23,794 | 60,454 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 216,869 | 313,668 | ||||||
Interest expense, net of interest income | 70,891 | 116,679 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 11,424 | 11,794 | ||||||
Operating income | $ | 338,880 | 511,364 | |||||
Equity in net loss (income) from unconsolidated joint ventures | (55,402) | (25,195) | ||||||
Marketing, general and administrative expense | 94,912 | 91,826 | ||||||
Transaction related costs, net | 3,773 | 503 | ||||||
Investment income | (80,340) | (120,163) | ||||||
Loan loss and other investment reserves, net of recoveries | 2,931 | 35,298 | ||||||
Non-building revenue | (46,110) | (53,067) | ||||||
Net operating income (NOI) | $ | 370,999 | 490,956 | |||||
Equity in net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures | (55,402) | (25,195) | ||||||
SLG share of unconsolidated JV depreciation and amortization | 243,791 | 194,393 | ||||||
SLG share of unconsolidated JV interest expense, net of interest income | 154,026 | 137,032 | ||||||
SLG share of unconsolidated JV amortization of deferred financing costs | 14,297 | 7,737 |
APPENDIX B | B-3 |
SLG share of unconsolidated JV loss on early extinguishment of debt | 1,372 | 97 | ||||||
SLG share of unconsolidated JV investment income | (1,229) | (1,146) | ||||||
SLG share of unconsolidated JV non-building revenue | (4,204) | (9,543) | ||||||
NOI including SLG share of unconsolidated JVs | $ | 723,650 | 794,331 | |||||
NOI from other properties/affiliates | (135,071) | (197,887) | ||||||
Same-Store NOI | $ | 588,579 | 596,444 | |||||
Ground lease straight-line adjustment | 978 | 1,022 | ||||||
SLG share of unconsolidated JV ground lease straight-line adjustment | 916 | 1,058 | ||||||
Straight-line and free rent | (7,087) | (7,076) | ||||||
Amortization of acquired above and below-market leases, net | (395) | (3,611) | ||||||
SLG share of unconsolidated JV straight-line and free rent | (12,422) | (20,190) | ||||||
SLG share of unconsolidated JV amortization of acquired above and below-market leases, net | (18,772) | (15,500) | ||||||
Same-store cash NOI | $ | 551,797 | 552,147 | |||||
Lease termination income | (3,592) | (10,783) | ||||||
SLG share of unconsolidated JV lease termination income | (3,680) | (590) | ||||||
Same-store cash NOI excluding lease termination income | $ | 544,525 | 540,774 |
Notes:
Funds from Operations
Funds from Operations, or FFO, is a widely recognized non-GAAP financial measure of REIT performance. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not compute FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition, or that interpret the NAREIT definition differently than we do. The revised White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in April 2002, and subsequently amended, defines FFO as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of properties, and real estate related impairment charges, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
We present FFO because we consider it an important supplemental measure of our operating performance and believe that it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, particularly those that own and operate commercial office properties. We also use FFO as one of several criteria to determine performance-based compensation for members of our senior management. FFO is intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and related assets, which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate, gains and losses from property dispositions, and real estate related impairment charges, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, and interest costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP), as an indication of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions.
Funds Available for Distribution
Funds Available for Distribution, or FAD, is a non-GAAP financial measure that is calculated as FFO plus non-real estate depreciation, allowance for straight line credit loss, adjustment for straight line operating lease rent, non-cash deferred compensation, and pro-rata adjustments from the Company’s unconsolidated JVs, less straight line rental income, free rent net of amortization, second cycle tenant improvement and leasing costs, and recurring capital expenditures.
B-4 | SL GREEN REALTY CORP. 2022 PROXY STATEMENT |
FAD is not intended to represent cash flow for the period and is not indicative of cash flow provided by operating activities as determined in accordance with GAAP. FAD is presented solely as a supplemental disclosure with respect to liquidity because the Company believes it provides useful information regarding the Company’s ability to fund its dividends. Because all companies do not calculate FAD the same way, the presentation of FAD may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. FAD does not represent cash flow from operating, investing and finance activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP), as an indication of the Company’s financial performance, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP), or as a measure of the Company’s liquidity.
Same-Store Cash Net Operating Income
Net Operating Income, or NOI, is a non-GAAP financial measure that is calculated as operating income before transaction related costs, gains/losses on early extinguishment of debt, marketing general and administrative expenses and non-real estate revenue. Cash NOI is also a non-GAAP financial measure that is calculated by subtracting free rent (net of amortization), straight-line rent, and the amortization of acquired above and below-market leases from NOI, while adding operating lease straight-line adjustment and the allowance for straight-line tenant credit loss.
We present NOI and Cash NOI because we believe that these measures, when taken together with the corresponding GAAP financial measures and our reconciliations, provide investors with usefulmeaningful information regarding the operating performance of propertiesour properties. When operating performance is compared across multiple periods, the investor is provided with information not immediately apparent from net income that are comparable for the periods presented. For properties owned since January1,2011and still ownedis determined in accordance with GAAP. NOI and Cash NOI provide information on trends in the same manner atrevenue generated and expenses incurred in operating our properties, unaffected by the endcost of the current quarter, the Company determines same-storeleverage, straight-line adjustments, depreciation, amortization, and other net operating income by subtracting same-store property operating expenses and ground rent from same-store recurring rental and tenant reimbursement revenues. Same-store cash net operating income is derived by deducting same-store straight lineand free rent from, and adding same-store tenant credit loss allowance to, same-store net operating income. The Company’s share of unconsolidated joint venture net operating income, same-store net operating income and same-store cash net operating income is calculated in the same mannercomponents. We use these metrics internally as noted above, but includes just the Company’s pro-rata share of the total amounts. Combined net operating income, same-store net operating income and same-store cash net operating income are calculated by combining the Company’s consolidated amount with the Company’s share of unconsolidated joint venture amounts for each measure.performance measures. None of these measures is an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) and same-store performance should not be considered an alternative to GAAP net income performance.
2016Proxy Statement B-4Same-Store refers to properties owned in the same manner during both the current and prior year, excluding development and redevelopment properties that are not stabilized for both the current and prior year.
SLG Share of Unconsolidated JV is computed by multiplying the referenced line item by the Company’s percentage ownership or economic interest in the respective joint ventures and may not accurately depict the legal and economic implications of holding a non-controlling interest in the respective joint ventures.
SL Green Realty Corp.
One Vanderbilt Avenue,
New York, NY 10017
212 594 2700 | slgreen.com
SL GREEN REALTY CORP.420 LEXINGTON AVE.ONE VANDERBILT AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 1017010017
AUTHORIZE YOUR PROXY BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up untilinformation. Vote by 11:59 P.M.p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.on May 31, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
AUTHORIZE YOUR PROXY BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up untilinstructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M.p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.on May 31, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
AUTHORIZE YOUR PROXY BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | |||
D76850-P69391 | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS | ||
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY | |||
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. |
SL GREEN REALTY CORP.
SL GREEN REALTY CORP. | ||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: | ||||||||||
1. | Election of Directors | |||||||||
Nominees: | For | Against | Abstain | |||||||
1a. | John H. Alschuler | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
1b. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||
1c. | Carol N. Brown | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
1d. | Edwin | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
1e. | Lauren B. Dillard | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
1f. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||
1g. | Craig M. Hatkoff | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
1h. | Marc Holliday | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
1i. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||
1j. | Andrew W. Mathias | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals: | For | Against | Abstain | |||||||
2. | To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, our executive compensation. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
For | Against | Abstain | ||||||||
3. | To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
4. | To approve our | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||
NOTE: The proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion upon | ||||||||||
The undersigned hereby acknowledge(s) receipt of the Notice of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the terms of which are incorporated herein by reference, and revoke(s) any proxy or proxies heretofore given with respect to the Annual Meeting. This proxy may be revoked at any time prior to the time voting is declared closed by giving the corporate secretary of SL Green Realty Corp. written notice of revocation or by a subsequently dated proxy, or by casting a ballot at the Annual Meeting. | ||||||||||
This solicitation of proxies is made by and on behalf of the Board.The validity of this proxy is governed by the Maryland General Corporation Law and applicable federal securities laws. This proxy does not revoke any prior powers of attorney except for prior proxies given in connection with the Annual Meeting. |
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. |
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:Meeting
to be Held on June 1, 2022: The Notice and Proxy Statement and 2021 Annual Report are available at
www.proxyvote.com.
SL GREEN REALTY CORP.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned stockholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Stephen L. GreenMarc Holliday and Andrew S. Levine, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote as designated on the reverse side of this ballot all of the shares of Common Stock of SL GREEN REALTY CORPCORP. that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at The Grand Hyattthe Auditorium at One Vanderbilt, One Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, 109 East 42nd Street, New York, New YorkNY 10017 at 10:00 A.M., local timeEastern Time on Thursday,Wednesday, June 2, 20161, 2022 and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE STOCKHOLDER(S) AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXYHOLDER ON ANY OTHER MATTER PROPERLY BROUGHT BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF. IF NO SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' NOMINEES LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE HEREOF AND FOR PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 4.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN AND DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE.
Continued and to be signed on reverse side